Case law

Opinion No. 70-169 (1970) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 10, 1970

The Attorney General has had under consideration your recent letter wherein you, in effect, ask the following question: What is the maximum legal number of board members who may serve on the governing board of a private, … Board of Trustees of Police Pension and Retirement System v. Barnes, Okl., 293 P.2d 590 (1956).

Opinion No. 74-192 (1975) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 16, 1975

To that extent, the legislative intent abrogates the language of Board of County Commissioners, Tulsa County v. Mars, Sheriff, cited supra, relating to profits realized by the sheriff. … Question (6) requests an opinion concerning a holding by the Oklahoma Supreme Court in the case of Board of County Commissioners, Tulsa County v.

Opinion No. 80-051 (1980) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 16, 1980

West v. Board of Comr's. of Caddo County, 59 Okl. 169 , 158 P. 354 (1916). … The purpose of the act is analogous to that of an irrigation district, and in Wood v. Imperial Irr.

RUSSELL, J.D. v. BENCHMARK CONTRACTORS, LLC

2025 TN WC 73 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Oct 23, 2025

Hawes v. McLane Co., Inc., 2021 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 30, at *10 (Aug. 25, 2021). … Lallo v. Marion Environmental, Inc., 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 32, at *6 (Sep. 4, 2015).

Opinion No. 76-116 (1976) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 6, 1976

Sizemore, et al. v. State Election Board, Okl., 217 P.2d 805 (1950), a fact situation almost identical to the problem at hand was considered by the Oklahoma Supreme Court. … Elections, 77, p. 102; Garner v. Tulsa Building and Loan Co., 131 Okl. 232 , 268 P. 722 , 58 A.L.R. 1269 ; McLaughlin v. Houston-Hudson Lumber Co., 31 Okl. 182 , 120 P. 659 , 38 L.R.A., N.S. 248 .

Hall v. State

37 Misc. 2d 1093 · New York Court of Claims · Dec 6, 1962

Hall could throw no light on what precisely caused the vehicle to cross over to the southbound lane into the path of the Brown truck. … (Boyce Motor Lines v. State of New York, 280 App. Div. 693 [1952], affd. 306 N. Y. 801 [1954]; Seide v. State of New York, 18 Misc 2d 371 [1959].) Purdy v.

GARCIA ALVAREZ, VICTOR E v. JAMES REED BIRNIE

2026 TN WC 56 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · May 4, 2026

WORKERS’ COMPENSATION CLAIMS AT MURFREESBORO VICTOR E GARCIA ALVAREZ Docket No. 2025-50-4529 Claimant, State File No. 15567-2025 v. … The Court Clerk will prepare the record for submission to the Appeals Board, and you will receive notice once it has been submitted.

Opinion No. (1991) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 14, 1991

SUCH SCHOOL BOARDS CAN EXERCISE ONLY THOSE POWERS THAT ARE GRANTED IN EXPRESS WORDS, THOSE FAIRLY IMPLIED IN OR NECESSARILY INCIDENTAL TO THE POWERS EXPRESSLY GRANTED. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF OKLAHOMA CITY V. … N EDWARDS V. BOARD OF EDUCATION, 169 P.2D 1015, 1017 (OKLA. 1946).

Opinion No. 69-324 (1969) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 6, 1969

Section 124 requires bids in writing, opening at a meeting of the Board of County Commissioners, and report to District Court for approval and confirmation. … In the case of Reubin v.

Bicjan v. Hunter College of the City University of New York

116 Misc. 2d 978 · New York Court of Claims · Dec 7, 1982

(See, e.g., Cantor v State, 43 AD2d 872, 873 .) Prior to its continuance as CUNY, the City Board of Higher Education was considered separate from its funding government body, the City of New York. … (See Nelson v Board of Higher Educ., 263 App Div 144, 149 , affd 288 NY 649 ; see, also, Gold v City of New York, 80 AD2d 138, 140 , and cases cited; Matter of Potter v Board of Educ., 43 AD2d 248, 249 .)

Pack, Jane v. Nashville CSC

2021 TN WC 235 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Oct 18, 2021

Code Ann. § 20-16-101 (2020); see also Rye v. Women’s Care Ctr. of Memphis, MPLLC, 477 S.W.3d 235, 264 (Tenn. 2015). If Nashville CSC does either or both, Ms. … To appeal to the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board, you must: 1.

Opinion No.

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 23, 1976

OPINION — AG — PURSUANT TO THE DECISIONS OF THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT (VIRGINIA STATE BOARD OF PHARMACY ET AL. V. … THE BOARD FROM ADOPTING SUCH RULES AND REGULATIONS.

Discenza v. New York Racing Ass'n

134 Misc. 2d 3 · Civil Court of the City of New York · Nov 6, 1986

Nearly every important aspect of NYRA’s operations is prescribed and governed by that statute or by the Rules and Regulations of the New York State Racing and Wagering Board (the Board) (9 NYCRR 4000.1 et seq. … (Accord, Shapiro v Queens County Jockey Club, 184 Misc, at p 299 ["The(se) rules and regulations (of the Board) control the manner of conducting races and the pari-mutuel system of wagering, which are binding upon the persons

Harris, Shunekari v. American International Group, Inc., d/b/a American Home Assurance

2024 TN WC 20 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Mar 13, 2024

As seen in the Appeals Board’s opinion in Hawes v. McLane Company, Inc., 2021 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. … As determined by the Appeals Board in Garcia Carrillo v. Hurtado, 2023 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd.

Hilco Transp., Inc. v. Atkins

2016 NCBC 6 · North Carolina Business Court · Jan 15, 2016

V, § 6. … V, § 6.

Question Submitted by: The Honorable John Haste, Oklahoma State Senate, District 36

2024 OK AG 4 · Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 28, 2024

Riley v. State, ex rel. McDaniel , 1914 OK 251, 141 P. 264; Burford v. Board of Comm'rs , 1917 OK 40, 162 P. 780; Welch v. Key , 1961 OK 201, 365 P.2d 154. … CHILDERS Discussed 1917 OK 40, 162 P. 780, 63 Okla. 42, BURFORD v. BOARD OF COM'RS OF LINCOLN COUNTY Discussed 2001 OK 110, 37 P.3d 882, 72 OBJ 3672, KEATING v. EDMONDSON Discussed 1961 OK 201, 365 P.2d 154, WELCH v.

St. Mary's Building Corporation v. Sarah E. Redman, Warrick County Assessor

Indiana Tax Court · Nov 21, 2019

STANDARD OF REVIEW The party seeking to overturn an Indiana Board final determination bears the burden of demonstrating its invalidity. Osolo Twp. Assessor v. … Assessor v. Duke, 69 N.E.3d 567, 570 (Ind. Tax Ct. 2017) (citing I.C. § 6-1.1-10-36(a); State Bd. of Tax Comm’rs v.

Employers' Indemnity Corp. v. Felter

277 S.W. 376 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Dec 2, 1925

Provided that for good cause the board may, in meritorious cases, waive the strict compliance with the foregoing limitations as to notice, and the filing the claim before the board.” *378 These sections of the law seem to … This rule is followed in Texas and elsewhere. *379 In the case of Rice v. Garrett, a compensation case (Tex. Civ. App.) 194 S.

Opinion No.

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 10, 1967

CITE: ARTICLE V, SECTION 57, 37 O.S. 1961 506 [ 37-506 ](24), 37 O.S. 1961 519 [ 37-519 ] (PENN LERBLANCE) FILENAME: m0000983 ROY PARHAM OKLAHOMA ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL BOARD ATTORNEY GENERAL OF OKLAHOMA — OPINION JULY … CITE: ARTICLE V, SECTION 57, 37 O.S. 1961 506 [ 37-506 ](24), 37 O.S. 1961 519 [ 37-519 ] (PENN LERBLANCE)

Satterfield, Kimberly v. Smokey Mountain Home Health & Hospice

2023 TN WC 47 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Jun 30, 2023

He is a board-certified orthopedic surgeon and American Board of Independent Medical Examiners, and a member of the Medical Impairment Rating Registry. … Code Ann. § 50-6-207(4); Batey 3 v. Deliver This, Inc., 568 S.W.3d 91, 97 (Tenn. 2018).