Case law

Opinion No. 70-111 (1970) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jan 29, 1970

In the second paragraph of the syllabus in Munger et al. v. … In the third paragraph of the syllabus of Munger et al. v.

Catering at Its Best v. Mult. Cty. Ass., Tc-Md 090837c (or.tax 10-1-2009)

Oregon Tax Court · Oct 1, 2009

See, e.g. , Yip v. … V.

Opinion No. 70-147 (1970) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 9, 1970

(Emphasis added) In Taylor v. State, Okl. … To the same effect, see Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Control Board v. Central Liquor Company, 421 P.2d 244 , Okl., (1966) and 1700 Peoria Inc. v. City of Tulsa, 422 P.2d 840 , Okl., (1966).

Opinion No. 79-151 (1979) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 1, 1979

Local school boards, like all other public agencies, may not accomplish by indirection that which they cannot do directly. … PERCIVAL) (ksg) ** SEE: OPINION NO. 95-014 (1996) ** ** SEE: 829 P.2d 973 (1992), BABB V. IND. SCH. DIST. I-5 **

RUSSELL, J.D. v. BENCHMARK CONTRACTORS, LLC

2025 TN WC 73 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Oct 23, 2025

Hawes v. McLane Co., Inc., 2021 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 30, at *10 (Aug. 25, 2021). … Lallo v. Marion Environmental, Inc., 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 32, at *6 (Sep. 4, 2015).

Opinion No. (1994)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 25, 1994

YORK V. TURPEN, 681 P.2D 763 (OKL. 1984). … SWART V. STATE, 720 P.2D 1265, 1270 (OKL.CR. 1986). "(T)HE DISCRETIONARY DISCHARGE OF A SENTENCE IS A MATTER SOLELY FOR THE GOVERNOR, UPON RECOMMENDATION FROM THE PARDON AND PAROLE BOARD." ID., AT 1271.

Opinion No. 70-169 (1970) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 10, 1970

The Attorney General has had under consideration your recent letter wherein you, in effect, ask the following question: What is the maximum legal number of board members who may serve on the governing board of a private, … Board of Trustees of Police Pension and Retirement System v. Barnes, Okl., 293 P.2d 590 (1956).

Opinion No. 74-192 (1975) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 16, 1975

To that extent, the legislative intent abrogates the language of Board of County Commissioners, Tulsa County v. Mars, Sheriff, cited supra, relating to profits realized by the sheriff. … Question (6) requests an opinion concerning a holding by the Oklahoma Supreme Court in the case of Board of County Commissioners, Tulsa County v.

GARCIA ALVAREZ, VICTOR E v. JAMES REED BIRNIE

2026 TN WC 56 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · May 4, 2026

WORKERS’ COMPENSATION CLAIMS AT MURFREESBORO VICTOR E GARCIA ALVAREZ Docket No. 2025-50-4529 Claimant, State File No. 15567-2025 v. … The Court Clerk will prepare the record for submission to the Appeals Board, and you will receive notice once it has been submitted.

Hall v. State

37 Misc. 2d 1093 · New York Court of Claims · Dec 6, 1962

Hall could throw no light on what precisely caused the vehicle to cross over to the southbound lane into the path of the Brown truck. … (Boyce Motor Lines v. State of New York, 280 App. Div. 693 [1952], affd. 306 N. Y. 801 [1954]; Seide v. State of New York, 18 Misc 2d 371 [1959].) Purdy v.

Opinion No. (1991) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 14, 1991

SUCH SCHOOL BOARDS CAN EXERCISE ONLY THOSE POWERS THAT ARE GRANTED IN EXPRESS WORDS, THOSE FAIRLY IMPLIED IN OR NECESSARILY INCIDENTAL TO THE POWERS EXPRESSLY GRANTED. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF OKLAHOMA CITY V. … N EDWARDS V. BOARD OF EDUCATION, 169 P.2D 1015, 1017 (OKLA. 1946).

Opinion No. 69-324 (1969) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 6, 1969

Section 124 requires bids in writing, opening at a meeting of the Board of County Commissioners, and report to District Court for approval and confirmation. … In the case of Reubin v.

Bicjan v. Hunter College of the City University of New York

116 Misc. 2d 978 · New York Court of Claims · Dec 7, 1982

(See, e.g., Cantor v State, 43 AD2d 872, 873 .) Prior to its continuance as CUNY, the City Board of Higher Education was considered separate from its funding government body, the City of New York. … (See Nelson v Board of Higher Educ., 263 App Div 144, 149 , affd 288 NY 649 ; see, also, Gold v City of New York, 80 AD2d 138, 140 , and cases cited; Matter of Potter v Board of Educ., 43 AD2d 248, 249 .)

Pack, Jane v. Nashville CSC

2021 TN WC 235 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Oct 18, 2021

Code Ann. § 20-16-101 (2020); see also Rye v. Women’s Care Ctr. of Memphis, MPLLC, 477 S.W.3d 235, 264 (Tenn. 2015). If Nashville CSC does either or both, Ms. … To appeal to the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board, you must: 1.

Opinion No. (1979)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 30, 1979

In building and maintaining county highways, boards of county commissioners must consider which highways will best serve the most people in the county. … No such restrictions are put on board's designation of section lines as roads where roads are to be constructed and maintained by the citizens who will receive the most benefit from the roads. Oldfield v.

Harris, Shunekari v. American International Group, Inc., d/b/a American Home Assurance

2024 TN WC 20 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Mar 13, 2024

As seen in the Appeals Board’s opinion in Hawes v. McLane Company, Inc., 2021 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. … As determined by the Appeals Board in Garcia Carrillo v. Hurtado, 2023 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd.

Hilco Transp., Inc. v. Atkins

2016 NCBC 6 · North Carolina Business Court · Jan 15, 2016

V, § 6. … V, § 6.

Question Submitted by: The Honorable John Haste, Oklahoma State Senate, District 36

2024 OK AG 4 · Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 28, 2024

Riley v. State, ex rel. McDaniel , 1914 OK 251, 141 P. 264; Burford v. Board of Comm'rs , 1917 OK 40, 162 P. 780; Welch v. Key , 1961 OK 201, 365 P.2d 154. … CHILDERS Discussed 1917 OK 40, 162 P. 780, 63 Okla. 42, BURFORD v. BOARD OF COM'RS OF LINCOLN COUNTY Discussed 2001 OK 110, 37 P.3d 882, 72 OBJ 3672, KEATING v. EDMONDSON Discussed 1961 OK 201, 365 P.2d 154, WELCH v.

St. Mary's Building Corporation v. Sarah E. Redman, Warrick County Assessor

Indiana Tax Court · Nov 21, 2019

STANDARD OF REVIEW The party seeking to overturn an Indiana Board final determination bears the burden of demonstrating its invalidity. Osolo Twp. Assessor v. … Assessor v. Duke, 69 N.E.3d 567, 570 (Ind. Tax Ct. 2017) (citing I.C. § 6-1.1-10-36(a); State Bd. of Tax Comm’rs v.

Barker v. JOHNSON COUNTY ASSESSOR

905 N.E.2d 544 · Indiana Tax Court · Apr 22, 2009

905 N.E.2d 544 (2009) BARKER v. JOHNSON COUNTY ASSESSOR. No. 49T10-0711-TA-68. Tax Court of Indiana. April 22, 2009. Disposition of cases by unpublished memorandum decision. … The court Reverses the Indiana Board's final determination and Remands this case to the Indiana Board.