Case law

Poyck v. Bryant

13 Misc. 3d 699 · Civil Court of the City of New York · Aug 24, 2006

(See, Barash v Pennsylvania Term. … (See, e.g., Board of Mgrs. of Vil. House v Frazier, 81 AD2d 760 [1st Dept 1981], affd 55 NY2d 991 [1982].)

College of Paterson v. City of Paterson

18 N.J. Misc. 29 · New Jersey Tax Court · Dec 12, 1939

A. of Garfield v. State Board (Supreme Court, 1936), 14 N. J. Mis. R. 831; 186 Atl. Rep. 702 , cited by petitioner, as authority to the contrary. … Dana College v. State Board of Tax Appeals (Supreme Court, 1936), 14 N. J. Mis. R. 308; 184 Atl. Rep. 412 . For the reasons aforementioned the judgment of the Passaic County Board is affirmed.

Moore, Arthur v. BF Nashville, d/b/a Wendy's

2016 TN WC 89 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Apr 21, 2016

COMPENSATION CLAIMS AT NASHVILLE ARTHUR MOORE, ) Employee, ) Docket No. 2015-06-0073 ) v. … After the Workers’ Compensation Judge approves the record and the Court Clerk transmits it to the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board, the appeal will be docketed and assigned to an Appeals Board Judge for Review.

Barker v. Reynolds

1 Del. Cas. 518 · Delaware Court of Common Pleas · Dec 3, 1814

(Vide Price v. Brown, 2 Str. 691.) New trial granted.

Opinion No. 68-365 (1968) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 27, 1968

This was exemplified in the case of Hawks v. … N or shall the Legislature make 'any grant to any retiring officer, Article V, Section 47 Constitution. . . .'"

Harris, Zechariah v. Subwau

2016 TN WC 80 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Apr 12, 2016

AT NASHVILLE ZECHARIAH HARRIS ) Docket No. 68533-2014 Employee, ) ) State File No. 2014-06-0018 v. … After the Workers’ Compensation Judge approves the record and the Court Clerk transmits it to the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board, the appeal will be docketed and assigned to an Appeals Board Judge for Review.

Craftsmen's Club of Rahway v. City of Rahway

18 N.J. Misc. 114 · New Jersey Tax Court · Feb 6, 1940

Borough of Red Bank (State Board), filed January 24th, 1939, followed in Hoboken Lodge No. 74, Benevolent Protective Order of Elks of America v. … City of Hoboken (State Board), filed February 21st, 1939, affirmed, City of Hoboken v. Hoboken Lodge No. 74, B. P. O. Elks of America (Supreme Court, 1939), 123 N. J. L. 506; 9 Atl. Rep. (2d) 783.

Love v. Rockwall Independent School Dist.

238 S.W. 642 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Mar 15, 1922

In 1900 the Supreme Court of Texas, speaking through Justice Williams, in the ease of Brownson v. Smith, Attorney General, 93 Tex. 614 , 57 S. … , and said board of trustees shall so order it.”

Morgan, Debbie v. Macy's Corporate Services

2016 TN WC 225 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Sep 30, 2016

On August 31, 2016, the Appeals Board vacated this Court's decision regarding medical necessity and remanded the case for reconsideration of its decision "in light ofthe admissible evidence." Morgan v. … Teter v. Republic Parking Sys ., 181 S. W.3d 330, 341 (Tenn. 2005). In this case, the Board found Ms. Morgan "did not offer proof at the expedited hearing that [Dr.

Green, Linda v. Rogers Group

2016 TN WC App. 70 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Dec 13, 2016

) Appeal from the Court of Workers’ ) Compensation Claims ) Robert V. … Hensley delivered the opinion of the Appeals Board in which Presiding Judge Marshall L. Davidson, III, and Judge Timothy W. Conner joined. Heather H.

Opinion No. 77-303 (1978) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 6, 1978

Firemen's Relief and Pension Board v. Ozment, Okl., 467 P.2d 502 (1970); Roberts, Sr. v. … Board of Trustees of Firemen's Relief and Pension Fund of Leedey, Okl., 292 P.2d 408 (1956); see also In Re Bensox, 178 Okl., 299 , 62 P.2d 962 (1936). Further, in the Supreme Court case of Roberts, Sr. v.

In re the Estate of Woodward

174 Misc. 919 · New York Surrogate's Court · Aug 1, 1940

Law, § 18; Low v. Bankers Trust Co., 270 N. Y. 143 ; Guaranty Trust Co. v. Halsted, 245 id. 447; Speir v. Benvenuti, 197 App. Div. 209 ; Matter of Brown, 169 Misc. 43 .) … (Fargo v. Squiers, 154 N. Y. 250 ; Matter of Wainwright, 248 App. Div. 336 ; Matter of Terwilliger, 135 Misc. 170 ; affd., 230 App. Div. 763 ; Matter of Brown, 169 Misc. 43 ; Matter of Wickham, 139 id. 729; Maynard v.

McBride v. City of Jersey City

19 N.J. Misc. 637 · New Jersey Tax Court · Nov 18, 1941

county board. … A. 54:4-15, as construed in Public Service Corp. v. City of Newark, New Jersey Tax Reports, 1934-1939, p. 269. 3.

Middlesex Builders, Inc. v. Township of Old Bridge

1 N.J. Tax 305 · New Jersey Tax Court · May 9, 1980

The County Board eliminated the increase in its 1977 judgment. … This would be in accord with the principles enunciated in Feder v. City of Passaic, 105 N.J.Super. 157 , 251 A.2d 457 (App.Div.1969) and New Brunswick v.

United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Nettles

35 S.W.2d 1045 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Mar 4, 1931

S. 1925, which, among other things, provides: “In special cases where in the judgment of the board manifest hardship and injustice would otherwise result, the board may compel the association in the eases provided for in … Ass’n v. Downing (Tex. Civ. App.) 218 S. W. 112 ; Texas Employers’ Ins. Ass’n v. Knouff (Tex. Civ. App.) 271 S. W. 683 ; Williams v. Employers’ Liability (Tex. Civ. App) 293 S. W. 210 .

Cincinnati Enquirer v. Butler Cty. Sheriff's Office

2025 Ohio 1650 · Ohio Court of Claims · Apr 11, 2025

Brown v. Columbiana Cty. Jail, 2024-Ohio-4969, ¶ 21. … For example, in Brown, a requester sought records from a county sheriff related to the operations of the county jail that were held by a private entity that managed the jail.

Opinion No. (1979)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 22, 1979

The State Employees Group Health and Life Insurance Board (hereafter the "Board") is authorized to contract for a claims administrator to process claims arising under the several group insurance plans. … See Wells v. Childers (Okla. 1945) 165 P.2d 371 , 376 . An additional consideration is whether a contract may be let which tends to bind the State of Oklahoma to an agreement to expend future fiscal year funds.

Hilton v. Hickory Springs Manufacturing Co.

North Carolina Industrial Commission · Apr 3, 1998

Hansel v. Sherman Textiles , 304 N.C. 44 , 283 S.E.2d 101 (1981), citing Booker v. Duke Medical Center , 279 N.C. 458 , at 468 and 475, 256 S.E.2d 189 , at 196 and 200 (1979); and Moore v. J. P. Stevens and Co., 47 N.C. … Rutledge v. Tultex Corp., 308 N.C. 85 , at 93-94, 301 S.E.2d 359 (1983). 4.

JC Trapper, LLC v. City of Jersey City

19 N.J. Tax 421 · New Jersey Tax Court · Feb 22, 2001

In New Jersey State Bar Ass’n. v. … In Garvey v.

Opinion No. (1992)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 25, 1992

CARTWRIGHT V. GEORGIA-PACIFIC CORP., 663 P.2D 718 (OKLA. 1982). WORDS IN A STATUTE ARE TO BE GIVEN THEIR ORDINARY MEANING. 25 O.S. 1 (1991). SISNEY V. SMALLEY, 690 P.2D 1048 (OKLA. 1984). … THE POWERS OF A BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT ARE SPECIFIED IN 11 O.S. 44 -104 AND DO NOT INCLUDE CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS.