Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersSS

10,000+ results

0.27s

  • College of Paterson v. City of Paterson

    18 N.J. Misc. 29 · New Jersey Tax Court · Dec 12, 1939

    A. of Garfield v. State Board (Supreme Court, 1936), 14 N. J. Mis. R. 831; 186 Atl. Rep. 702 , cited by petitioner, as authority to the contrary. … Dana College v. State Board of Tax Appeals (Supreme Court, 1936), 14 N. J. Mis. R. 308; 184 Atl. Rep. 412 . For the reasons aforementioned the judgment of the Passaic County Board is affirmed.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1991) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 4, 1991

    , WHO SUPERVISE THE ELECTIONS FOR BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE FAIR ASSOCIATION. … LEASING V. STATE BOARD OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, 737 P.2D 1191 (1987).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Boyd, David v. Tennessee Children's Home

    2016 TN WC 269 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Nov 14, 2016

    Scott v. Integrity Staffing Solutions, No. 2015-01-0055, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 24, at *6 (Tenn. Workers' Comp. App. Bd. Aug. 18, 20 15). … d., (citing Williams v. Saturn Corp., No. M2004-01215-WC-R3- CV, 2005 Tenn. LEXIS 1032, at *6 (Tenn. Workers' Comp. Panel Nov. 15, 2005)).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Bedwell, Donna v. Richland Country Club

    2018 TN WC 61 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · May 3, 2018

    Regardless, the Appeals Board addressed a somewhat similar factual scenario in Berdnik v. Fairfield Glade Community Club, 2017 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 32 (May 18, 20 17). … See Lurz v. Int'l Paper Co., 2018 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Avadim Health, Inc. v. Daybreak Cap. Partners, LLC

    2021 NCBC 73 · North Carolina Business Court · Nov 30, 2021

    Brown, Jr., and Stanley Yorsz, for Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant Avadim Health, Inc. and Counterclaim Defendant Stephen Woody. … At all relevant times Woody was Avadim’s Chief Executive Officer and served on Avadim’s Board of Directors. (Countercls. ¶ 2.) 4.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 79-165 (1979) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 30, 1979

    In building and maintaining county highways, boards of county commissioners must consider which highways will best serve the most people in the county. … No such restrictions are put on board's designation of section lines as roads where roads are to be constructed and maintained by the citizens who will receive the most benefit from the roads. Oldfield v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Rice, James v. VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER

    2025 TN WC 22 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Apr 28, 2025

    Freeman v. Marco Transp. Co., 27 S.W.3d 909, 911 (Tenn. 2000). Even though Mr. … The Court Clerk will prepare the record for submission to the Appeals Board, and you will receive notice once it has been submitted.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1989)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 23, 1989

    ON FEBRUARY 3, 1989, PPOK WAS AWARDED A STATE CONTRACT BY THE STATE EMPLOYEES GROUP INSURANCE BOARD TO ACT AS A PREFERRED PROVIDER OF PHARMACEUTICAL SUPPLIES FOR PERSONS WHO ARE MEMBERS OF THE STATE BOARD'S PREFERRED PROVIDER … IN ATTORNEY GENERAL OPINION NO. 79-202, IT WAS OPINED: "A MEMBER OF A WATER BOARD IS "INDIRECTLY INTERESTED" IN A CONTRACT LET BY THE BOARD WHEN A MEMBER HAS OR IS LIKELY TO HAVE A PECUNIARY OR PERSONAL INTEREST IN _ THE

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Citizens' Guaranty State Bank of Hutchins v. National Surety Co.

    258 S.W. 468 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Feb 13, 1924

    The eases of Walsh v. Methodist, etc., Church (Tex. Civ. App.) 173 S. W. 241 , and American Indemnity Company v. Board of Trustees (Tex. Civ. App.) 200 S. … United States v. Britton, 108 U. S. 199 , 2 Sup. Ct. 531, 27 L. Ed. 698 ; 3 Michie on Banks and Banking, 1936; National Surety Co. v. Atascosa Ice, etc., Co. (Tex. Civ. App.) 222 S. W. 605; United States, etc., Co. v.

    Cited 21 timesPublished
  • Morgan, Debbie v. Macy's Corporate Services

    2016 TN WC 225 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Sep 30, 2016

    On August 31, 2016, the Appeals Board vacated this Court's decision regarding medical necessity and remanded the case for reconsideration of its decision "in light ofthe admissible evidence." Morgan v. … Teter v. Republic Parking Sys ., 181 S. W.3d 330, 341 (Tenn. 2005). In this case, the Board found Ms. Morgan "did not offer proof at the expedited hearing that [Dr.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • STEELE, JEFFREY v. DREAMLINER LUXURY COACHES, LLC

    2026 TN WC 60 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · May 6, 2026

    The Court Clerk will prepare the record for submission to the Appeals Board, and you will receive notice once it has been submitted. … After the Workers’ Compensation Judge approves the record and the Court Clerk transmits it to the Appeals Board, a docketing notice will be sent to the parties.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1985)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Dec 6, 1985

    If any of said board of county commissioners finds that substantial detriment to the roads and bridges in their respective counties would occur, said board shall determine reasonable measures necessary to upgrade the roads … Cavett v. Geary Board of Education , 587 P.2d 991 , 993 (Okla. 1978).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No.

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 26, 1980

    May a school district be penalized in terms of reduced state aid based on average daily attendance if the local school board or administration had cut short a school day or days because said school board or administration … See Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Control Bd. v. Moss, Okl. 509 P.2d 666 (1973); Eason Oil Co. v. Corporation Comm'n., Okl. 535 P.2d 283 (1975).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Nettles

    35 S.W.2d 1045 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Mar 4, 1931

    S. 1925, which, among other things, provides: “In special cases where in the judgment of the board manifest hardship and injustice would otherwise result, the board may compel the association in the eases provided for in … Ass’n v. Downing (Tex. Civ. App.) 218 S. W. 112 ; Texas Employers’ Ins. Ass’n v. Knouff (Tex. Civ. App.) 271 S. W. 683 ; Williams v. Employers’ Liability (Tex. Civ. App) 293 S. W. 210 .

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 73-275 (1974) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Dec 3, 1974

    STATE BOARD OF HEALTH — ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REQUIREMENTS The State Board of Health does have the legal authority to promulgate rules and regulations for the control of the construction or modification of indirect … Becknell v. State Industrial Court, 512 P.2d 1180 (Okl. 1973); City of Tahlequah v. Franklin, 200 P.2d 417 (Okl. 1948).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 76-283 (1976) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 28, 1976

    Board of Trustees of Police Pension and Retirement System of the City of Tulsa v. Kern, Okl., 366 P.2d 415 (1961). … Board of Education of City of Okmulgee v. State Board of Education, Okl., 200 P.2d 394 (1949).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Morris v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr.

    2010 Ohio 5692 · Ohio Court of Claims · Nov 1, 2010

    [Cite as Morris v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr., 2010-Ohio-5692.] … Brown Richard F. Swope Kristin S.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 90-540 (1990)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 31, 1990

    FURTHERMORE, IN HALSTEAD V. … V.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 74-121 (1974) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 8, 1974

    As a general rule, statutory construction is that as expressed in Poafpybitty v. … There is no exemption from that provision for the attendant services provided by the Oklahoma State Board of Affairs.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • In re the Estate of Greenslitt

    165 Misc. 464 · New York Surrogate's Court · Jun 29, 1937

    (Moore v. Lyons, 25 Wend. 119 ; Sage v. Wheeler, 3 App. Div. 38 ; Matter of Brown, 93 N. Y. *467 295 ; Delafield v. Shipman, 103 N. Y. 463 ; Stokes v. Weston, 142 N. Y. 433 ; Bisson v. West Shore R, R. Co., 143 N. … Y. 125 ; Corse v. Chapman, 153 N. Y. 466 ; Hersee v. Simpson, 154 N. Y. 496 ; Goodwin v. Coddington, 154 N. Y. 283 ; Matter of Brown, 154 N. Y. 313 .) ” (See, also, Matter of Russell, 168 N. Y. 169, 175 .)

    Cited 4 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.