Case law

Bedwell, Donna v. Richland Country Club

2018 TN WC 61 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · May 3, 2018

Regardless, the Appeals Board addressed a somewhat similar factual scenario in Berdnik v. Fairfield Glade Community Club, 2017 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 32 (May 18, 20 17). … See Lurz v. Int'l Paper Co., 2018 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd.

In re the judicial settlement of the account of Kerr

1 Connoly 230 · New York Surrogate's Court · Jan 15, 1889

In the case of Thompson v. Brown, Id. 628, the Chancellor quotes with approval the opinion of Lord Hardwicke in Knight v. … Bowker v. Pierce, 130 Mass. 262 ; Brown v. French, 125 Mass. 410 ; Harvard College v. Amory, 9 Pick. 446 . The same latitude is allowed by the courts of New Hampshire and Vermont. French v. Currier, 47 N.

Rice, James v. VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER

2025 TN WC 22 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Apr 28, 2025

Freeman v. Marco Transp. Co., 27 S.W.3d 909, 911 (Tenn. 2000). Even though Mr. … The Court Clerk will prepare the record for submission to the Appeals Board, and you will receive notice once it has been submitted.

Opinion No. 78-169 (1978) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Oct 25, 1978

ROADS, BRIDGES FERRIES The Board of County Commissioners has the authority to regulate and place restrictions on traffic using county highways. … Woods v. Phillips Petroleum Company, 207 Okl. 490 , 251 P.2d 505 ; Jenkins v. Frederick, 208 Okl. 583 , 257 P.2d 1058 .

Opinion No. (1989)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 23, 1989

ON FEBRUARY 3, 1989, PPOK WAS AWARDED A STATE CONTRACT BY THE STATE EMPLOYEES GROUP INSURANCE BOARD TO ACT AS A PREFERRED PROVIDER OF PHARMACEUTICAL SUPPLIES FOR PERSONS WHO ARE MEMBERS OF THE STATE BOARD'S PREFERRED PROVIDER … IN ATTORNEY GENERAL OPINION NO. 79-202, IT WAS OPINED: "A MEMBER OF A WATER BOARD IS "INDIRECTLY INTERESTED" IN A CONTRACT LET BY THE BOARD WHEN A MEMBER HAS OR IS LIKELY TO HAVE A PECUNIARY OR PERSONAL INTEREST IN _ THE

Morgan, Debbie v. Macy's Corporate Services

2016 TN WC 225 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Sep 30, 2016

On August 31, 2016, the Appeals Board vacated this Court's decision regarding medical necessity and remanded the case for reconsideration of its decision "in light ofthe admissible evidence." Morgan v. … Teter v. Republic Parking Sys ., 181 S. W.3d 330, 341 (Tenn. 2005). In this case, the Board found Ms. Morgan "did not offer proof at the expedited hearing that [Dr.

STEELE, JEFFREY v. DREAMLINER LUXURY COACHES, LLC

2026 TN WC 60 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · May 6, 2026

The Court Clerk will prepare the record for submission to the Appeals Board, and you will receive notice once it has been submitted. … After the Workers’ Compensation Judge approves the record and the Court Clerk transmits it to the Appeals Board, a docketing notice will be sent to the parties.

Ellman Land Corp. v. State

169 Ariz. 13 · Arizona Tax Court · Aug 22, 1991

See RCJ *15 Corp. v. Arizona Dep’t of Revenue, 168 Ariz. 328 , 812 P.2d 1146 (Tax 1991). A proceeding pursuant to A.R.S. § 42-177 is an appeal. Maricopa County v. … County of Pima v. Arizona Dep’t of Revenue, 114 Ariz. 275 , 560 P.2d 793 (1977). A taxpayer who seeks review of a valuation of its property for tax purposes must name and serve the proper parties. Pesqueira v.

United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Nettles

35 S.W.2d 1045 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Mar 4, 1931

S. 1925, which, among other things, provides: “In special cases where in the judgment of the board manifest hardship and injustice would otherwise result, the board may compel the association in the eases provided for in … Ass’n v. Downing (Tex. Civ. App.) 218 S. W. 112 ; Texas Employers’ Ins. Ass’n v. Knouff (Tex. Civ. App.) 271 S. W. 683 ; Williams v. Employers’ Liability (Tex. Civ. App) 293 S. W. 210 .

Opinion No. (1992)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 22, 1992

THE TEST TO DETERMINE WHETHER A PERSON IS A PUBLIC OFFICER WAS SET FORTH IN OKLAHOMA CITY V. … THE SUPREME COURT HAS HELD THAT A MEMBER OF A BOARD OF EDUCATION MEETS THIS THREE-PRONGED TEST AND IS REGARDED AS A PUBLIC OFFICER. GIBSON V. CROWDER, 165 P.2D 628 (OKLA.1946); WIMBERLY V.

Opinion No. 73-275 (1974) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Dec 3, 1974

STATE BOARD OF HEALTH — ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REQUIREMENTS The State Board of Health does have the legal authority to promulgate rules and regulations for the control of the construction or modification of indirect … Becknell v. State Industrial Court, 512 P.2d 1180 (Okl. 1973); City of Tahlequah v. Franklin, 200 P.2d 417 (Okl. 1948).

Opinion No. 76-283 (1976) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 28, 1976

Board of Trustees of Police Pension and Retirement System of the City of Tulsa v. Kern, Okl., 366 P.2d 415 (1961). … Board of Education of City of Okmulgee v. State Board of Education, Okl., 200 P.2d 394 (1949).

Morris v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr.

2010 Ohio 5692 · Ohio Court of Claims · Nov 1, 2010

[Cite as Morris v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr., 2010-Ohio-5692.] … Brown Richard F. Swope Kristin S.

Citizens' Guaranty State Bank of Hutchins v. National Surety Co.

258 S.W. 468 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Feb 13, 1924

The eases of Walsh v. Methodist, etc., Church (Tex. Civ. App.) 173 S. W. 241 , and American Indemnity Company v. Board of Trustees (Tex. Civ. App.) 200 S. … United States v. Britton, 108 U. S. 199 , 2 Sup. Ct. 531, 27 L. Ed. 698 ; 3 Michie on Banks and Banking, 1936; National Surety Co. v. Atascosa Ice, etc., Co. (Tex. Civ. App.) 222 S. W. 605; United States, etc., Co. v.

Opinion No. (1980) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 19, 1980

In Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Control Board v. … In Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Control Board v.

Opinion No. 78-243 (1978) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Dec 11, 1978

It is well settled that by virtue of Article V , Section 36 of the Oklahoma Constitution, the Oklahoma Legislature has the authority to set county salaries. … Further, the Oklahoma Supreme Court in Board of County Commissioners of Tulsa County v.

Opinion No. 74-121 (1974) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 8, 1974

As a general rule, statutory construction is that as expressed in Poafpybitty v. … There is no exemption from that provision for the attendant services provided by the Oklahoma State Board of Affairs.

Opinion No. 79-165 (1979) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 30, 1979

In building and maintaining county highways, boards of county commissioners must consider which highways will best serve the most people in the county. … No such restrictions are put on board's designation of section lines as roads where roads are to be constructed and maintained by the citizens who will receive the most benefit from the roads. Oldfield v.

Opinion No. 74-131 (1974) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 29, 1974

In the recent case of Sugarman v. … In this regard, see also Traux v. Raich, 239 U.S. 33 , at 41 , 60 L.Ed.2d 131 , 36 S.Ct. 7 (1915).

Barker v. Reynolds

1 Del. Cas. 518 · Delaware Court of Common Pleas · Dec 3, 1814

(Vide Price v. Brown, 2 Str. 691.) New trial granted.