Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.81s
Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 28, 1976
Board of Trustees of Police Pension and Retirement System of the City of Tulsa v. Kern, Okl., 366 P.2d 415 (1961). … Board of Education of City of Okmulgee v. State Board of Education, Okl., 200 P.2d 394 (1949).
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 4, 1980
Further, all ordinary and necessary expenditures may only be paid upon due authorization of the Board. It is apparent from the language, Board authorization is a condition precedent to payment of cemetery expenses. … Parks v. Stith, 108 Okl. 84 , 232 P.2d 614 (1951).
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 3, 1979
In addition, the chairman and members of said Pardon and Parole Board shall receive their actual and necessary expenses while attending and going to and from meetings of the Board and in performing their official duties, … The Court in Reubin v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedBASF Corp. Coating & Ink Division v. Town of Belvidere
22 N.J. Tax 550 · New Jersey Tax Court · Dec 19, 2005
Koch v. … See Busik v.
Cited 5 timesPublishedOverlook Hospital Ass'n v. City of Summit
6 N.J. Tax 90 · New Jersey Tax Court · Sep 22, 1983
As stated in Boys Club of Clifton v. … Maine Medical Center v. Lucci, 317 A.2d 1 (Me.Sup.Ct.1974); Bowers v. Akron City Hospital, 16 Ohio St.2d 94 , 243 N.E.2d 95 (Sup.Ct.1968); Ellis Hospital v. Fredette, 27 App.Div.2d 390, 279 N.Y.S.2d 925 (App. Div.1967).
Cited 8 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 28, 1978
We recognize the case of City of Altus, Oklahoma v. Carr, 255 F. Supp. 828 (W.D. Tex. 1966), as dealing with a similar issue, but find it not dispositive of this question. … Inc. v. Cottrell (Miss. 1976), 96 S.Ct. 923 , 424 U.S. 366 , 47 L.Ed.2d 55 .
Cited 0 timesPublished2024 TN WC 59 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Aug 22, 2024
Code Ann. § 50-6-239(c)(6) (2023); McCord v. Advantage Human Resourcing, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 6, at *7-8, 9 (Mar. 27, 2015). … In Ernstes v. Printpack, the Appeals Board instructed that trial courts evaluating the issue of notice should consider the steps below: A.
Cited 0 timesPublished19 Abb. N. Cas. 413 · New York Surrogate's Court · May 15, 1887
That section was evidently suggested to the Code Commissioners by decisions *417 heretofore rendered in Wood v. Brown ( 34 N. Y. 337 ) and in Burt v. Burt ( 41 N. Y. 46 ). In Wood v. … The case was like the case at bar, and unlike that of Wood v. Brown, in the circumstance that no question was made respecting the safety of the fund involved or the responsibility of its custodian.
Cited 2 timesPublishedPayne, Ian-Chanel v. Signet Jewelers
2024 TN WC 75 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Oct 28, 2024
Code Ann. § 50-6-239(c)(6) (2024); McCord v. Advantage Human Resourcing, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 6, at *7-8, 9 (Mar. 27, 2015). … The Court Clerk will prepare the record for submission to the Appeals Board, and you will receive notice once it has been submitted.
Cited 0 timesPublished2024 OK AG 3 · Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 22, 2024
Board of Pharmacy on the Physician Assistant Drug Formulary. 59 O.S.2021, § 519.6(E)(1). … 2000 OK AG 34, Question Submitted by: Lyle Kelsey, Executive Director, Board of Medical Licensure and Supervision Cited Oklahoma Supreme Court Cases Cite Name Level 1939 OK 467, 97 P.2d 58, 186 Okla. 217, CASE v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 10, 1976
The State Board of Public Affairs is authorized to use brand names in taking competitive bids. … After recognizing that certain constitutional agencies may be exempt from the Act under the authority of Trapp v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 23, 1977
See, Oldham v. Drummond Board of Education of Independent School District, Okl., 542 P.2d 1309 (1975). … See, Spurrier v. Mallouf, 184 Okl. 251 , 86 P.2d 995 (1939).
Cited 0 timesPublishedKhalaf v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
North Carolina Industrial Commission · Feb 20, 2009
Stat. § 97-2 ; Brown v. Family Dollar Distrib. Ctr. 129 N.C. App. 361 , 499 S.E.2d 197 (1998). *Page 8 2. … Stat. § 97-2 (6); Brown v. Family Dollar Distrib. Ctr. 129 N.C. App. 361 (1998). 3.
Cited 0 timesPublishedHarris, Eboni v. Vanderbilt University Medical Center
2023 TN WC App. 21 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · May 25, 2023
Rye v. Women’s Care Ctr. of Memphis, MPLLC, 477 S.W.3d 235, 250 (Tenn. 2015). … Whitaker v. Whirlpool Corp., 32 S.W.3d 222, 227 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2000).
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 27, 1968
"On the interpretation of statutes we find that in McCain v. … "In Blanset v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedHulen v. American Cent. Ins. Co.
45 S.W.2d 570 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Jan 27, 1932
Brown v. Palatine Ins. Co., 89 Tex. 590 , 35 S. W. 1060 ; 14 R. C. L. p. 925; 32 C. J. p. 1146. In Brown v. Palatine Ins. … Co., supra, Judge Brown announced the following: “To determine the intention of parties to a contract of insurance its construction must be governed by the following rules: “(1) The language, being selected and used by the
Cited 2 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 8, 1980
governing said school district, and for all other purposes approved by the State Board of Education. … See Vette v. Childers, 102 Okl. 140 , 228 P. 145 (1924).
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 28, 1976
may be paid by a board of education at school district expense. … to carry out and fulfill all powers herein grant Syllabus 2 by the Court in City of Wilburton v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Oct 25, 1978
ROADS, BRIDGES FERRIES The Board of County Commissioners has the authority to regulate and place restrictions on traffic using county highways. … Woods v. Phillips Petroleum Company, 207 Okl. 490 , 251 P.2d 505 ; Jenkins v. Frederick, 208 Okl. 583 , 257 P.2d 1058 .
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna