Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersSS

10,000+ results

0.48s

  • Opinion No. 80-173 (1981) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jan 21, 1981

    Board of Commissioners v. Bruce, 51 Okl. 541 , 152 P. 125 (1915), relying in part on Moore v. Nation, 80 Kan. 682 , 103 P. 107 (1909). As explained in Moore v. … The concept expressed by Board of Commissioners v. Bruce and Moore v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 70-171 (1970) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 30, 1970

    TEACHERS RETIREMENT SYSTEM — RETROACTIVE PAYMENTS The Board of Trustees of the Oklahoma Teachers' Retirement System can make retroactive payments to one of its members for prior service credit not previously claimed, but … Hedges v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 68-285

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 8, 1968

    Any action of the committee shall be approved by the Board." … In O'Brien Packing Co. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Harris, Eboni v. Vanderbilt University Medical Center

    2023 TN WC App. 21 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · May 25, 2023

    Rye v. Women’s Care Ctr. of Memphis, MPLLC, 477 S.W.3d 235, 250 (Tenn. 2015). … Whitaker v. Whirlpool Corp., 32 S.W.3d 222, 227 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2000).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Locklear v. N.C. Department of Correction

    North Carolina Industrial Commission · Mar 17, 2011

    Bolkhir v. N.C. State University , 321 N.C. 706 , 709 , 365 S.E.2d 898 , 900 (1988). 3. … Bolkhir v. N.C. State Univ. , 321 N.C. 706 , 709 , 365 S.E.2d 898 , 900 (1988). 4.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 69-115 (1969) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 5, 1969

    Bureau of Indian Affairs, must be classified and supervised by me State Personnel Board. … In Board of County Commissioners v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Fellows v. Fellows

    4 Cow. 682 · Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · Jun 15, 1825

    Brown, 6 John. Ch. … The rule in Brinkerhoff v. Brown, is the correct one, and this case comes within it. Savage, Ch. J. In Brinkerhoff v. Brown, (6 John Ch.

    Cited 49 timesPublished
  • Wilson, Scott v. American Paper & Twine Co.

    2022 TN WC 38 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · May 2, 2022

    Code Ann. § 50-6-239(d)(1) (2021); McCord v. Advantage Human Resourcing, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 6, at *7-8, 9 (Mar. 27, 2015). … The Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board recently addressed this question in Braden v. Mohawk Indus. Inc., 2022 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 11 (Mar. 1, 2022).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1968) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 27, 1968

    "On the interpretation of statutes we find that in McCain v. … "In Blanset v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • STEELE, JEFFREY v. DREAMLINER LUXURY COACHES, LLC

    2026 TN WC 60 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · May 6, 2026

    The Court Clerk will prepare the record for submission to the Appeals Board, and you will receive notice once it has been submitted. … After the Workers’ Compensation Judge approves the record and the Court Clerk transmits it to the Appeals Board, a docketing notice will be sent to the parties.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 79-224 (1979) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 3, 1979

    In addition, the chairman and members of said Pardon and Parole Board shall receive their actual and necessary expenses while attending and going to and from meetings of the Board and in performing their official duties, … The Court in Reubin v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1996)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 5, 1996

    Supp. 1995, § 5-117[ 70-5-117 ], which sets forth the powers and duties of the board of education. … City of Duncan v. Bingham, 394 P.2d 456 , 460 (Okla. 1964).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Queen's Gap Cmty. Ass'n v. McNamee

    2011 NCBC 36 · North Carolina Business Court · Sep 23, 2011

    Ass’n, Inc. v. McNamee, 2011 NCBC 36. … Street v. Smart Corp., 157 N.C. App. 303, 305, 578 S.E.2d 695, 698 (2003) (quoting Aubin v. Susi, 149 N.C. App. 320, 324, 560 S.E.2d 875, 878 (2002)).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 72-181 (1972) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 23, 1972

    Special Indemnity Fund v. Harold, Okl., 398 P.2d 827 . … State ex rel Marland v. Phillips Petroleum Company et al, 189 Okl. 629 , 118 P.2d 621 .

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (2003)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jan 31, 2003

    V. … Rather, as the Oklahoma Supreme Court held in Nesbitt v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • ADKINS, RICHARD v. CODY ALLISON & ASSOCIATES

    2024 TN WC 57 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Aug 9, 2024

    Acevedo v. Crown Paving, LLC, 2023 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 7, at *14 (Jan. 27, 2023). Yet the Board has not been asked the difficult question here. … The Appeals Board has observed that “employers are prohibited from paying any medical bill for a covered injury outside the fee schedule[.]” Bragg v. Premium Servs., LLC, 2023 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 71-158 (1971) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 19, 1971

    Letteer v. … Co. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Woman's Club v. Township of Little Falls

    20 N.J. Misc. 278 · New Jersey Tax Court · Jun 16, 1942

    In City of Camden v. Camden County Board of Taxation (Supreme Court, 1938), 121 N. J. L. 262; affirmed (Court of Errors and Appeals, 1939), 122 Id. 381; 5 Atl. … City of Elizabeth, Id. p. 675; Camp No. 62, Patriotic Order of Americans v. City of Camden (State Board, 1941), 19 N. J. Mis. R. 115; 17 Atl. Rep. (2d) 566.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Harward v. Hewlett

    5 Redf. 330 · New York Surrogate's Court · Oct 15, 1881

    upon the presumption that. the testator, in such case, must have intended that the legatee should in the meantime be maintained at his expense, thus discharging his moral obligation or carrying out his benevolent design (Brown … v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1985)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 15, 1985

    Hughes Drilling Co. v. Morgan , 648 P.2d 32 (Okla. 1982). Clearly, then, on its face the Open Meeting Act is applicable to the Board of Regents of Seminole Junior College. See , 70 O.S. 4423 , supra. … However, we find no such exception with regard to the Board of Regents of Seminole Junior College.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.