Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersSS

10,000+ results

1.40s

  • Opinion No. (1997)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 12, 1997

    The purpose of the activity funds must be approved and regulated by the board. … Public Service Company of Oklahoma v. Oklahoma Corporation Commission, 842 P.2d 750 , 752 (Okla. 1992). It is presumed that the Legislature, in the statute, said what it meant and meant what it said. Darnell v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Le, Man Thai v. Sumitomo Electric Wiring Systems, Inc.

    2024 TN WC 58 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Aug 13, 2024

    Code Ann. § 50-6-239(d)(1) (2023); McCord v. Advantage Human Resourcing, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 6, at *7-8, 9 (Mar. 27, 2015). As a threshold issue, Ms. … The Court Clerk will prepare the record for submission to the Appeals Board, and you will receive notice once it has been submitted.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People v. Valerio

    54 Misc. 3d 791 · Criminal Court of the City of New York · Dec 5, 2016

    (People v Brown, 31 Misc 3d 794, 796 [Rochester City Ct 2011].) … People v Peluso, 192 Misc 2d 33 [Crim Ct, Kings County 2002] [statement of readiness illusory]; People v Tisdale, 18 Misc 3d 1125[A] , 2008 NY Slip Op 50201[U] [Crim Ct, Kings County 2008] [same]; People v Seepersad, 52 Misc

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Kubic v. Audette

    Massachusetts Land Court · Feb 11, 2021

    In support of their request, the Plaintiffs rely principally on Brown v. … Quoting Baxendale v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • DAVIDSON, JAMES v. GIBSON GUITAR

    2025 TN WC 2 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Jan 28, 2025

    As the Appeals Board has stated, “parties and their lawyers cannot rely solely on their own medical interpretations of the evidence to successfully support their arguments.” Lurz v. Int’l Paper Co., 2018 TN Wrk. Comp. … Heard v. Carrier Corp., 2018 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 16, at *5 (Apr. 20, 2018).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (2008)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 22, 2008

    of Nursing, to order, select, obtain and administer legend drugs, Schedules II through V controlled substances, devices, and medical gases only when engaged in the preanesthetic preparation and evaluation; anesthesia induction … The Board may terminate the authorization granted to a CRNA as follows: d.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • In re Shaw

    192 A.3d 350 · Court of Judicial Discipline of Pennsylvania · Jul 18, 2018

    On November 1, 2016, the Board filed a Board Complaint against Respondent Shaw in the Court of Judicial Discipline (CJD). In re Shaw, 5 JD 2016. 219. … On September 9, 2016, the Board had not yet filed the Board Complaint against Respondent Shaw and therefore the charged conduct was not public knowledge. 224. Robin M.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1985)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Dec 2, 1985

    See also, Magnolia Petroleum Company v. Jefferson County Excise Board , 90 P.2d 648 (Okla. 1939); Tulsa County Excise Board v. … See, City of Healdton v. Board of Education , 232 P.2d 148 (Okla. 1951) (bondholder may bring action, including mandamus, when school district refuses to levy annual taxes to pay for improvements); Board of Education v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • BRAULIO J. HERNANDEZ RAMOS v. TEJ PRAMUKH HOSPITALITY, INCORPORATED, d/b/a ECONO LODGE

    2025 TN WC 27 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · May 14, 2025

    Code Ann. § 20-16-101 (2022); see also Rye v. Women’s Care Ctr. of Memphis, MPLLC, 477 S.W.3d 235, 264 (Tenn. 2015). If TEJ does either or both, Ms. … The Court Clerk will prepare the record for submission to the Appeals Board, and you will receive notice once it has been submitted.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Dodson v. Wright State University

    91 Ohio Misc. 2d 57 · Ohio Court of Claims · Dec 3, 1997

    Dodson is board-certified as an obstetrician/gynecologist (“OB/GYN”) and received a Ph.D. in microbiology and immunology. … Chan v. Miami Univ. (1995), 73 Ohio St.3d 52, 57 , 652 N.E.2d 644, 648 , citing Brown v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1988)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 23, 1988

    The degree of authority granted to these various other boards of regents varies tremendously from board to board, even as among the constitutionally authorized boards, and no attempt is made here to examine such differences … Draper v. State Board of Equalization, 414 P.2d 276 (Okla. 1966). Legislative silence, when it has authority to speak, may be considered as giving rise to an implication of legislative intent. City of Duncan v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 70-246 (1970) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 14, 1970

    That is to say, Chase v. … Both Murray v. State, supra, and Chase v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 72-210 (1972) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 20, 1972

    A similar provision, though, was construed in Elder v. Anderson, 205 Cal.App.2d 326 , 23 Cal.Rptr. 48 (1962). … A determination of the propriety of issuing such information would then be a decision of the local school district Board of Education, such Board being the governing authority of the school district, see 70 O.S. 5 -106 [

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • In re Fletcher

    1 Misc. 2d 25 · New York Family Court · Jan 11, 1955

    (Garlock v. Garlock, 279 N. Y. 337 ; Haas v. Haas, 298 N. Y. 69 ; Van Dyke v. Van Dyke, 278 App. Div. 446 ; Horowitz v. Horowitz, 197 Misc. 260 .) … 623 ; Helman v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Leona G. v. Edwin G.

    101 Misc. 2d 824 · New York Family Court · Nov 26, 1979

    (See Matter of Shirley M. v Craig M., 70 Misc 2d 974 ; cf. Matter of *828 Silver v Silver, 36 NY2d 324 .) … The award of counsel fees pursuant to section 438 of the Family Court Act is conditioned not only upon counsel’s own appraisal of the services rendered but also all other circumstances of the case (Matter of Brown v Brown

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Petroleum Underground Storage Tank Release Comp. Bd. v. Std. Oil Co.

    2019 Ohio 2455 · Ohio Court of Claims · May 17, 2019

    In Amoco v. … In Goodyear Tire and Rubber Co. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No.

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 26, 1980

    See State v. Guardian Funeral Home, Okl. 429 P.2d 732 (1967). … See First National Bank v. Oklahoma Savings and Loan Board, 569 P.2d 993 (1977).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • City of Jersey City v. Martin

    20 N.J. Misc. 283 · New Jersey Tax Court · May 26, 1942

    Trustees of Stevens Institute v. State Board (Supreme Court, 1928), 105 N. J. L. 99. … State Board (Supreme Court, 1886), 49 N. J. L. 1; Turnley v. Elizabeth, (Supreme Court, 1908), 76 Id. 42; 68 Atl. Rep. 1094 ; Schetty v. City of Jersey City (State Board, 1940), 18 N. J. Mis. R. 37; 11 Atl.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Appeal of the Town of Montclair v. Kimberly School

    25 N.J. Misc. 165 · New Jersey Tax Court · Jan 28, 1947

    Justice Perskie in Trenton v. State Board of Tax Appeals , 127 N. J. L. 105; 21 Atl. … Trenton v. State Board of Taxes and Assessment, surpa; Dwight School of Englewood, supra.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1985)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 6, 1985

    Dear Honorable Moss, The Attorney General has received your request for an official opinion asking, in effect: Does a County Board of Equalization have the authority to request a taxpayer to submit information to the Board … Hughes Drilling Co. v. Morgan , 648 P.2d 32 (Okla. 1982); Cave Springs Public School District I-30 v. Blair , 613 P.2d 1046 (Okla. 1980).

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.