Case law

Opinion No. 75-159 (1975) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Oct 2, 1975

See Dixon v. Zick, Colo., 500 P.2d 130 . … an individual not seeking licensure from the Board to perform psychological services under the direct supervision of a licensed psychologist, provided, however that such person has prior Board approval to perform such services

Downer v. Eggleston

15 Wend. 51 · Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · Dec 15, 1835

See Richards v. Blood, 17 Mass.Rep. 66. The same court had also decided that board and lodging, washing, &c. were all included within the meaning of the terms goods delivered and services performed. Witler v. … The two cases which the note refers to on this point, are those of Brown v. Cuming, 2 Caines, 33 , where it was decided that a party could not set off a claim for damages for not keeping a vessel insured, and Gordon v.

Harris v. State

21 Misc. 2d 89 · New York Court of Claims · Jan 7, 1960

(Post v. Lyford, 285 App. Div. 101, 104 [1954].) The claimant was discharged from prison December 19, 1956. … Dote v. Martin, 294 N. Y. 330, 333 [1945]; see, also, People ex rel. Rainone v. Murphy, 1 N Y 2d 367, 370 [1956].)

Bogard, Janice v. Federal Express Corp.

2023 TN WC App. 24 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Jun 21, 2023

See Leek v. Powell, 884 S.W.2d 118, 121 (Tenn. Ct. … See, e.g., English v. G4S Secure Solutions, No. 2016-05-0261, 2017 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 12, at *4 (Tenn. Workers’ Comp. App. Bd.

Eckardt v. Sisler Enterprises

1 N.J. Tax 25 · New Jersey Tax Court · Feb 5, 1980

Plaintiffs initiated a proceeding in the Somerset County Board of Taxation (county board) to increase the 1972 assessment on defendant’s property located at 900 Hamilton Street, Franklin Township, New Jersey. … In my view, the resolution of this issue is governed by decisions of our Supreme Court in the cases of Newark v. Fischer, 8 N.J. 191 , 84 A.2d 547 (1951); Union Terminal Cold Storage v.

Opinion No. (1985)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 29, 1985

Public Service Co. v. Northwest Rogers County , 675 P.2d 134 (Okla. 1983). … Taylor v. State , 377 P.2d 508 (Okla.Cr. 1962).

Opinion No. 69-292 (1969) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Dec 31, 1969

The Supreme Court of the State of Oklahoma in Board of Commissioners of Oklahoma County, et al. v. … , and such Board does not have authority to deed or lease such land for oil and gas development."

Opinion No. 77-261 (1977) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Dec 12, 1977

Bogert, The Law of Trusts, Section 92, page 331 (5th Ed. 1973); Morville v. Fowle, 144 Mass. 109 , 10 N.E. 766 ; In Re Johnson, D.C. Okl., 518 F.2d 246 (1975) . … Williamson v. Evans, Okl. Cr., 319 P.2d 1112 (1957).

Robbins v. Wake County B.O.E.

North Carolina Industrial Commission · May 21, 2001

Victor Roggli of Duke University is a board-certified physician in the areas of anatomic and clinical pathology and forensic medicine. … Robbins employment at the Devereaux Street facility for the Wake County Board of Education exposed her to greater risk of contracting the disease mesothelioma than the public generally. 16.

Opinion No. (1989)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 25, 1989

Blankenship v. Atoka County, 456 P.2d 537 (Okla. 1969), and Excise Board of Stephens County v. Chicago, R.I. P. Ry. … Reherman v. Oklahoma Water Resources Board, 679 P.2d 1296 (Okla. 1984). See also Pawnee County Excise Board v.

Opinion No. 78-303 (1978) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Dec 28, 1978

McVicker v. Board of County Commissioners of Caddo County, 442 P.2d 297 (1968). … See Hampton v. Ewert, 22 F.2d 81 , cert. den. 48 S.Ct. 303 , 276 U.S. 623 (1972), and more recently in Boydston v.

Opinion No.

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 17, 1975

PROHIBITED FROM SERVING AS A MEMBER OF THE BOARD BY VIRTUE OF 51 O.S. 1971 6 [ 51-6 ] OR ARTICLE V , SECTION 23 OKLAHOMA CONSTITUTION; HOWEVER, UNDER THE SEPARATION OF POWERS PROVISION CONTAINED IN ARTICLE IV , SECTION 1 … CITE: ARTICLE V, SECTION 2, 53 O.S. 1971 16 [ 53-16 ], 53 O.S. 1971 17 [ 53-17 ], 53 O.S. 1971 18 [ 53-18 ], 53 O.S. 1971 1 [ 53-1 ] (GERALD E. WEIS)

McCLANAHAN, MARK v. v. ) State File No. 80482-2019 BOBBY TUCKER

2024 TN WC 94 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Dec 23, 2024

In Baumgardner v. United Parcel Serv., 2017 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. … The Court Clerk will prepare the record for submission to the Appeals Board, and you will receive notice once it has been submitted.

Opinion No. (1992)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Oct 10, 1992

YORK V. TURPIN, 681 P.2D 763 (OKLA. 1984). … WESTINGHOUSE V. GRAND RIVER DAM AUTHORITY, 720 P.2D 713, 718 (OKLA. 1986).

Opinion No. 72-140 (1972) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 12, 1972

In Pardoe v. … "In State ex rel Newman v.

Opinion No. (2000)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 6, 2000

THE BOARD OF DENTISTRY ¶ 4 The Board is typical of numerous professional licensing boards in the State of Oklahoma. … ."); Burger King Corp. v.

Opinion No. 80-136 (1980) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 23, 1980

Cf., Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Control Board v. Heublein Wines, International, 566 P.2d 1158 , 1162 (Okla. 1977). … See, Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Control Board v. Burris, P.2d, 51 O.B.A.J. 939 (Okla. 1980) reh. denied, June 30, 1980, No. 52,197.

Opinion No. 92-572 (1992)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 5, 1992

IS THERE A PROHIBITION OR CONFLICT OF INTEREST FOR VERD ARK CA BOARD MEMBERS TO SERVE AS EODD BOARD MEMBERS OR OFFICERS? … CARTWRIGHT V. GEORGIA PACIFIC CORP., 663 P.2D 718 (OKLA.1982).

Schimpf v. Little Egg Harbor Township

14 N.J. Tax 338 · New Jersey Tax Court · Aug 9, 1994

In *329 appeals to the Tax Court there is a presumption that a judgment entered by a county board of taxation is correct. Riverview Gardens v. North Arlington Bor., 9 N.J. 167, 87 A.2d 425 (1952). … This presumption stands until it is overcome by evidence that is sufficiently “definite, positive and certain in quality and quantity” to prove a valuation different from the county board’s judgment. Ford Motor Co. v.

Lapchenko v. State

2 Misc. 2d 478 · New York Court of Claims · Jun 18, 1956

(Embler v. Town of Wallkill, 132 N. Y. 222 ; Julian v. State of New York, 187 Misc. 146 ; Messinger v. State of New York, 183 Misc. 811 ; Brown v. State of New York, 2 Misc 2d 307 ; Tagg v. City of Lockport, 228 App. … Y. 582 ; McGarey v. City of New York, 89 App. Div. 500 .) This applies whether the trunks of the trees are inside or outside of the highway bounds. (Messinger v. State of New York, supra; Brown v.