Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
0.87s
Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 19, 1969
Dry Cleaners Board — Consultant The State Dry Cleaners' Board may hire a person with a strong technical and professional background in the dry cleaning industry who will be able to provide those persons engaged in the cleaning … Special Indemnity Fund v. Prewitt, 201 Okl. 308 , 205 P.2d 306 (1949); Boydston v. State, Okl., 277 P.2d 138 (1954).
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Dec 20, 1977
Hart v. … See United States v. State Tax Commission of Mississippi, et al., 421 U.S. 599 , 44 L.Ed.2d 404 , 95 S.Ct. 1872 (1975); United States v.
Cited 0 timesPublished8 Abb. N. Cas. 118 · New York Surrogate's Court · Dec 15, 1879
McGillis, 9 Barb. 35 ; Brown v. Brown, 16 Id. 572; Vandemark v. Vandemark, 26 Id. 416; Adams v. Winne, 7 Paige, 97 ; McNaughton v. McNaughton, 34 N. Y. 201 ). The will speaks as of the time of the death of the testator. … But compare Lathrop v. Dunlop, 4 Hun, 213 ; 63 N. Y. 610 ; Walker v. Hall, 34 Penn. St. 483, 486, which do not sanction a distinction between the conclusive efiEect of these revocations.
Cited 2 timesPublishedClapa v. Multnomah County Assessor
Oregon Tax Court · May 21, 2012
Jeffrey Brown (Brown), Real Property Appraiser, Multnomah County Oregon, Division of Assessment, Recording & Taxation, appeared on behalf of Defendant. … Richardson v. Clackamas County Assessor, TC–MD No 020869D, WL 21263620, at *2 (Mar 26, 2003) (citing Gangle v. Dept. of Rev., 13 OTR 343, 345 (1995)).
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedAmerican Employers' Ins. Co. v. Singleton
24 S.W.2d 26 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Feb 12, 1930
Singleton in due time and manner presented her claim for compensation on account of the death of her son to the State Industrial Accident Board; that said board made an award in favor of the claimant, from which' award both … Co. v. Washington, 94 Tex. 510 , 63 S. W. 534 ; Montrief v. Bragg (Tex. Com. App.) 2 S.W.(2d) 276 ; Rosenthal, etc., v. Hillebrandt (Tex. Com. App.) 7 S.W. (2d) 521 ; Russell v. Bailey (Tex. Civ. App.) 290 S. W. 1108 .
Cited 72 timesPublished120 Misc. 2d 51 · Civil Court of the City of New York · Jul 11, 1983
Assoc. v Salle (NYLJ, March 11, 1983, p 12, col 2). … Loft Board Regulations On April 11, 1983 the Loft Board promulgated “Coverage Regulations Pursuant to Section 281 of Article 7-C of the Multiple Dwelling Law.”
Cited 8 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 6, 1990
OR AFFINITY TO THE PRESIDENT OF AN INSTITUTION GOVERNED BY THAT BOARD? … SEE REDDELL V. STATE. SUPRA.
Cited 0 timesPublishedBOOKER, VEATRICE v. US FARATHANE CORP.
2026 TN WC 75 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · May 29, 2026
Code Ann. § 20-16-101 (2025); Rye v. Women’s Care Ctr. of Memphis, MPLLC, 477 S.W.3d 235, 264 (Tenn. 2015). Dr. Brophy, Ms. Booker’s authorized treating physician, unequivocally stated that Ms. … The Court Clerk will prepare the record for submission to the Appeals Board, and you will receive notice once it has been submitted.
Cited 0 timesPublished164 Misc. 2d 581 · New York Court of Claims · Feb 24, 1995
Appeals of the rulings of the Chief Administrator went to a Classification Review Board (Review Board). (See, Matter of Association of Secretaries to Justices of Supreme & Surrogate’s Cts. v Office of Ct. … In addition, while claimants may have impermissibly split their cause of action (Pauk v Board of Trustees of City Univ. of N.Y., 68 NY2d 702 ; White v State of New York, 161 Misc 2d 938 ), in that the article 78 proceeding
Cited 2 timesPublished17 Mills Surr. 417 · New York Surrogate's Court · Jun 2, 1916
In consequence of the decision of the United States Supreme Court in 1911, in the case of Standard Oil Co. v. United States ( 221 U.
Cited 0 timesPublished2026 TN WC 92 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Jun 25, 2026
She also accused counsel of unethical behavior and threatened her with a complaint to the Board of Professional Responsibility. Ms. … Cloyd v. Hartco Flooring Co., 274 S.W.3d 638, 647 (Tenn. 2008). Ms.
Cited 0 timesPublishedScott, Janice v. The Kroger Co.
2024 TN WC 74 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Oct 10, 2024
However, the Appeals Board found that an employee’s “subjective belief, no matter how sincerely held, is not a sufficient basis to support her claim for workers’ compensation benefits.” Rucker v. … The Court Clerk will prepare the record for submission to the Appeals Board, and you will receive notice once it has been submitted.
Cited 0 timesPublishedClapa v. Multnomah County Assessor
Oregon Tax Court · May 21, 2012
Jeffrey Brown (Brown), Real Property Appraiser, Multnomah County Oregon, Division of Assessment, Recording & Taxation, appeared on behalf of Defendant. … Richardson v. Clackamas County Assessor, TC–MD No 020869D, WL 21263620, at *2 (Mar 26, 2003) (citing Gangle v. Dept. of Rev., 13 OTR 343, 345 (1995)).
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 22, 2008
of Nursing, to order, select, obtain and administer legend drugs, Schedules II through V controlled substances, devices, and medical gases only when engaged in the preanesthetic preparation and evaluation; anesthesia induction … The Board may terminate the authorization granted to a CRNA as follows: d.
Cited 0 timesPublished2021 TN WC 195 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Jul 2, 2021
Under those circumstances, the Appeals Board found reliance on the physician’s “testimony or various causation opinions . . . problematic.” Corecivic also pointed to Barnes v. Jack Cooper Transp., 2020 TN Wrk. Comp. … In Beech v. G4S Secure Solutions (USA), Inc., 2020 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd.
Cited 0 timesPublishedMassachusetts Land Court · Aug 4, 2021
Doe v. The Governor, 381 Mass. 702 , 705 (1980). … Ginther v. Comm'r of Insurance, 427 Mass. 319 , 322, n. 6 (1998). The right to appeal the decision of a local zoning board's grant of a special permit is governed by G.L. c. 40A, §17.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 9, 1999
See, e.g., City of Birmingham v. Hawkins, 94 So. 62 , 65 (Ala. 1922); Nichols v. Galveston County, 228 S.W. 547 , 548 (Tex. 1921); and Chemical Bank Trust Co. v. Oakland County, 251 N.W. 395 , 400 (Mich. 1933). … See Oklahoma State Election Board v. Coats, 610 P.2d 776 , 778-79 (Okla. 1980).
Cited 0 timesPublishedShaw v. Cumberland Cty. B.O.E.
North Carolina Industrial Commission · Jun 20, 2005
Page or any other agent of the Cumberland County Board of Education was negligent in the operation of the bus or that Ms. Page's actions were in any way a contributing cause of the accident. 7. … Stat. § 143-300.1 ; Huff v. Northampton County Bd. of Educ., 259 N.C. 75 , 130 S.E.2d 26 (1963). 2. The evidence presented in this case regarding the actions of Ms.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 13, 1973
In Pierce v. … The Supreme Court of Kansas considered a similar question in Crevhon, et al. v. Board of Education of City of Parsons, 163 P. 145 .
Cited 0 timesPublished792 A.2d 34 · Court of Judicial Discipline of Pennsylvania · May 4, 2002
I.INTRODUCTION The Judicial Conduct Board (Board) filed a Complaint with this Court against District Justice Richard H. … The Judicial Conduct Board (hereinafter referred to as the “Board”) is empowered by Article V, § 18 of the Constitution of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania to file formal charges alleging ethical misconduct on the part of
Cited 13 timesPublished
Ask Donna