Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersSS

10,000+ results

1.87s

  • Linzee v. State of New York

    122 Misc. 2d 207 · New York Court of Claims · Dec 19, 1983

    (O’Rourke v Long, 41 NY2d 219 .) It would be inappropriate for this court to express any views concerning unresolved matters now before the Board. (Botwinick v Ogden, 59 NY2d 909 .) … (O’Rourke v Long, supra, p 222.) We cannot usurp the power of the Board and subvert that purpose. (See O’Connor v Midiria, 55 NY2d 538 .)

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • In Re Kelly

    757 A.2d 456 · Court of Judicial Discipline of Pennsylvania · Aug 23, 2000

    I.INTRODUCTORY SUMMARY The Judicial Conduct Board (Board) has filed a Complaint with this Court against Senior District Justice James Martin Kelly (Respondent). … The Judicial Conduct Board (hereinafter referred to as the “Board”) is empowered by Article V, § 18 of the Constitution of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania to file formal charges alleging ethical misconduct on the part of

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • Sun Pipe Line Co. v. Township of West Deptford

    25 N.J. Tax 466 · New Jersey Tax Court · Jul 23, 2010

    Board of Educ. v. Neptune Twp. Educ. Ass’n, 144 N.J. 16, 25 , 675 A.2d 611 (1996)(quotations omitted). … Muscarelle, Inc. v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • In re the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of Cushman

    16 Mills Surr. 389 · New York Surrogate's Court · Apr 15, 1916

    This was a case where the defendant gave to the plaintiff the following paper to induce the plaintiff to loan to Delos Brown and Joseph Brown, who were indebted to the defendant, the sum of $400, viz., “ Mr. … Hadcock: The Browns are good for what money you let them have.” Signed, “ D. Osmer.”

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Center for Molecular Medicine & Immunology v. Township of Belleville

    18 N.J. Tax 215 · New Jersey Tax Court · Dec 14, 1998

    A taxpayer can bypass the County Board of Taxation and appeal directly to the Tax Court if the assessment exceeds $750,000. In Mayfair Holding Corp. v. … In Brick Tp. v.

    Reversed by Center for Molecular Medicine & Immunology v. Township of Belleville, 19 N.J. Tax 193 (2000)Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 79-356 (1980) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 22, 1980

    Woods v. Board of Equalization, Okla., 517 P.2d 430 (1973); Bretts v. Commissioner of Land Office, 17 Okla. 64 , 110 P. 766 (1910). … The Supreme Court in Woods v. State Board of Equalization, supra, expressly held that federal revenue sharing funds were subject to the state's appropriation process.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1994)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 1, 1994

    YOUR QUESTION ASKS WHETHER A PERSON WHO IS EMPLOYED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE MUNICIPAL PUBLIC WORKS AUTHORITY MAY SERVE ON THE BOARD OF THE GRDA AS AN "OFFICER OF A MUNICIPALITY." … SEE ALSO, OLIVER V. CITY OF TULSA, 654 P.2D 607 (OKLA.1982)."

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Millinder, Charles v. Maplewood Health Care

    2021 TN WC 238 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Nov 1, 2021

    Thomas v. Zipp Express, 2017 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 22, at *11 n.4 (Mar. 15, 2017). … See also Rye v. Women’s Care Ctr. Of Memphis, MPLLC., 477 S.W.3d 235, 264 (Tenn. 2015). Under law, Mr.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Galloway Township v. Petkevis

    2 N.J. Tax 85 · New Jersey Tax Court · Dec 24, 1980

    Defendants claim the action of the county board was correct, citing Meixner v. Bridgewater Tp. (Dkt. # L 6796-74, Div. of T. A.-1976). … White v. State Board of Tax Appeals, 123 N.J.L. 350 , 8 A.2d 819 (Sup.Ct.1939).

    Cited 37 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1991)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 7, 1991

    City of Tulsa v. Midland Valley R. Co., 168 F.2d 252 , 254 (10th Cir. 1948), citing City of Tulsa v. … Mid-Continent Pipe Line Co. v. Stephens County, Excise Board, 312 P.2d 883 (Okla. 1957).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 72-135 (1972) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 27, 1972

    ** Summary ** TERM OF FIRST APPOINTEES TO COMMUNITY JUNIOR COLLEGE BOARD A member of an initial community junior college board of trustees will serve a term of at least three hundred and sixty-five days from the effective … Wehran v. Helis, La. App., 152 So.2d 220 . Further, the "year" in law is three hundred and sixty-five calendar days, Ex parte Johnson, 53 Ariz. 161 , 87 P.2d 107 .

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (2007)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 20, 2007

    Riffe Petroleum Co. v. Great Nat. Corp., Inc. , 614 P.2d 576 , 579 (Okla. 1980). As the Supreme Court of New Mexico observed in State, ex rel . Gonzales v. … Campbell v. Campbell , 450 P.2d 203 , 205 (Okla. 1966).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 68-302 (1968) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 13, 1968

    Tharel v. Board of County Com'rs of Creek County, 188 Okl. 184 , 107 P.2d 542 , determines the answer to your first question. … We feel that it is appropriate — though not necessary in answering your specific questions to call your attention to certain dicta in the case of Headley v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • In re the Estate of Wagner

    112 Misc. 2d 302 · New York Surrogate's Court · Jan 25, 1982

    The administration was delegated to a *305 board of managers. The record is also sparse as to the complete powers and duties of this board. … (Sherman v Richmond Hose Co., 230 NY 462 ; Matter of Bowne, 11 Misc 2d 597 ; Matter of Clark, 1 Misc 2d 869 .)

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1994)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 26, 1994

    THE STATUTORY DUTY OF THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES TO MANAGE THE BUSINESS AND AFFAIRS OF THE COOPERATIVE IS MORE LIKE THE FUNCTIONS OF THE BOARD OF A PRIVATE CORPORATION. … A CASE SIMILAR TO THE SITUATION POSED IS SCHOENBAUM V. ORANGE COUNTY CENTER FOR PERFORMING ARTS.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Colligan v. McKernan

    2 Dem. Sur. 421 · New York Surrogate's Court · Apr 15, 1884

    That such evidence is sufficient is also déclared in the following cases : Jackson v. Le Grange (19 Johns., 386 ); Dan v. Brown (4 Cow., 483 ); Jackson v. Betts (6 Cow., 377 ); Chapman v. … Rodgers (12 Hun, 347 ); Helyar v. Helyar (1 Lee's Cases, 472); Brown v. Brown (8 Ellis & Black., 876); Havard v. Davis ( 2 Binn., 406 ) ; Graham v. O’Fallon ( 3 Mo., 507 ); Dickey v. Malechi ( 6 Mo., 177 ); Kearns v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Lallo, Ralph v Marion Environmental, Inc.

    2015 TN WC App. 28 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Sep 4, 2015

    Conner, delivered the opinion of the Appeals Board, in which Judge Marshall L. Davidson, III, and Judge David F. Hensley joined. … McCord v. Advantage Human Resourcing, No. 2014-06-0063, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 6, at *9-10 (Tenn. Workers' Comp. App. Bd. Mar. 27, 2015).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • City of Jersey City v. Polish Army War Veterans

    18 N.J. Misc. 40 · New Jersey Tax Court · Jan 9, 1940

    Washington Camp v. Board of Equalization of Taxes (Supreme Court, 1915), 87 N. J. L. 53; 93 Atl. Rep. 856 ; Perez Service Club v. … City of Passaic (State Board), filed January 10th, 1939; Knights of Columbus Building Association of Newark, New Jersey v. City of Newark (State Board), filed August 14th, 1939.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 74-143 (1975) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 21, 1975

    Cox v. Dillingham, 184 P.2d 976 , (1947) and McCurtain County Excise Board v. St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co., 30 P.2d 213 (1959). … In State v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Baugus, Alice v. Tennessee Farmers Mutual Insurance Company

    2023 TN WC App. 29 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Jul 18, 2023

    ) v. ) State File No. 59724-2021 ) Tennessee Farmers Mutual Ins. … Henderson v. SAIA, Inc., 318 S.W.3d 328 (Tenn. 2010).

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.