Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.87s
122 Misc. 2d 207 · New York Court of Claims · Dec 19, 1983
(O’Rourke v Long, 41 NY2d 219 .) It would be inappropriate for this court to express any views concerning unresolved matters now before the Board. (Botwinick v Ogden, 59 NY2d 909 .) … (O’Rourke v Long, supra, p 222.) We cannot usurp the power of the Board and subvert that purpose. (See O’Connor v Midiria, 55 NY2d 538 .)
Cited 2 timesPublished757 A.2d 456 · Court of Judicial Discipline of Pennsylvania · Aug 23, 2000
I.INTRODUCTORY SUMMARY The Judicial Conduct Board (Board) has filed a Complaint with this Court against Senior District Justice James Martin Kelly (Respondent). … The Judicial Conduct Board (hereinafter referred to as the “Board”) is empowered by Article V, § 18 of the Constitution of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania to file formal charges alleging ethical misconduct on the part of
Cited 19 timesPublishedSun Pipe Line Co. v. Township of West Deptford
25 N.J. Tax 466 · New Jersey Tax Court · Jul 23, 2010
Board of Educ. v. Neptune Twp. Educ. Ass’n, 144 N.J. 16, 25 , 675 A.2d 611 (1996)(quotations omitted). … Muscarelle, Inc. v.
Cited 5 timesPublishedIn re the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of Cushman
16 Mills Surr. 389 · New York Surrogate's Court · Apr 15, 1916
This was a case where the defendant gave to the plaintiff the following paper to induce the plaintiff to loan to Delos Brown and Joseph Brown, who were indebted to the defendant, the sum of $400, viz., “ Mr. … Hadcock: The Browns are good for what money you let them have.” Signed, “ D. Osmer.”
Cited 5 timesPublishedCenter for Molecular Medicine & Immunology v. Township of Belleville
18 N.J. Tax 215 · New Jersey Tax Court · Dec 14, 1998
A taxpayer can bypass the County Board of Taxation and appeal directly to the Tax Court if the assessment exceeds $750,000. In Mayfair Holding Corp. v. … In Brick Tp. v.
Reversed by Center for Molecular Medicine & Immunology v. Township of Belleville, 19 N.J. Tax 193 (2000)Cited 4 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 22, 1980
Woods v. Board of Equalization, Okla., 517 P.2d 430 (1973); Bretts v. Commissioner of Land Office, 17 Okla. 64 , 110 P. 766 (1910). … The Supreme Court in Woods v. State Board of Equalization, supra, expressly held that federal revenue sharing funds were subject to the state's appropriation process.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 1, 1994
YOUR QUESTION ASKS WHETHER A PERSON WHO IS EMPLOYED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE MUNICIPAL PUBLIC WORKS AUTHORITY MAY SERVE ON THE BOARD OF THE GRDA AS AN "OFFICER OF A MUNICIPALITY." … SEE ALSO, OLIVER V. CITY OF TULSA, 654 P.2D 607 (OKLA.1982)."
Cited 0 timesPublishedMillinder, Charles v. Maplewood Health Care
2021 TN WC 238 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Nov 1, 2021
Thomas v. Zipp Express, 2017 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 22, at *11 n.4 (Mar. 15, 2017). … See also Rye v. Women’s Care Ctr. Of Memphis, MPLLC., 477 S.W.3d 235, 264 (Tenn. 2015). Under law, Mr.
Cited 0 timesPublished2 N.J. Tax 85 · New Jersey Tax Court · Dec 24, 1980
Defendants claim the action of the county board was correct, citing Meixner v. Bridgewater Tp. (Dkt. # L 6796-74, Div. of T. A.-1976). … White v. State Board of Tax Appeals, 123 N.J.L. 350 , 8 A.2d 819 (Sup.Ct.1939).
Cited 37 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 7, 1991
City of Tulsa v. Midland Valley R. Co., 168 F.2d 252 , 254 (10th Cir. 1948), citing City of Tulsa v. … Mid-Continent Pipe Line Co. v. Stephens County, Excise Board, 312 P.2d 883 (Okla. 1957).
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 27, 1972
** Summary ** TERM OF FIRST APPOINTEES TO COMMUNITY JUNIOR COLLEGE BOARD A member of an initial community junior college board of trustees will serve a term of at least three hundred and sixty-five days from the effective … Wehran v. Helis, La. App., 152 So.2d 220 . Further, the "year" in law is three hundred and sixty-five calendar days, Ex parte Johnson, 53 Ariz. 161 , 87 P.2d 107 .
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 20, 2007
Riffe Petroleum Co. v. Great Nat. Corp., Inc. , 614 P.2d 576 , 579 (Okla. 1980). As the Supreme Court of New Mexico observed in State, ex rel . Gonzales v. … Campbell v. Campbell , 450 P.2d 203 , 205 (Okla. 1966).
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 13, 1968
Tharel v. Board of County Com'rs of Creek County, 188 Okl. 184 , 107 P.2d 542 , determines the answer to your first question. … We feel that it is appropriate — though not necessary in answering your specific questions to call your attention to certain dicta in the case of Headley v.
Cited 0 timesPublished112 Misc. 2d 302 · New York Surrogate's Court · Jan 25, 1982
The administration was delegated to a *305 board of managers. The record is also sparse as to the complete powers and duties of this board. … (Sherman v Richmond Hose Co., 230 NY 462 ; Matter of Bowne, 11 Misc 2d 597 ; Matter of Clark, 1 Misc 2d 869 .)
Cited 1 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 26, 1994
THE STATUTORY DUTY OF THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES TO MANAGE THE BUSINESS AND AFFAIRS OF THE COOPERATIVE IS MORE LIKE THE FUNCTIONS OF THE BOARD OF A PRIVATE CORPORATION. … A CASE SIMILAR TO THE SITUATION POSED IS SCHOENBAUM V. ORANGE COUNTY CENTER FOR PERFORMING ARTS.
Cited 0 timesPublished2 Dem. Sur. 421 · New York Surrogate's Court · Apr 15, 1884
That such evidence is sufficient is also déclared in the following cases : Jackson v. Le Grange (19 Johns., 386 ); Dan v. Brown (4 Cow., 483 ); Jackson v. Betts (6 Cow., 377 ); Chapman v. … Rodgers (12 Hun, 347 ); Helyar v. Helyar (1 Lee's Cases, 472); Brown v. Brown (8 Ellis & Black., 876); Havard v. Davis ( 2 Binn., 406 ) ; Graham v. O’Fallon ( 3 Mo., 507 ); Dickey v. Malechi ( 6 Mo., 177 ); Kearns v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedLallo, Ralph v Marion Environmental, Inc.
2015 TN WC App. 28 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Sep 4, 2015
Conner, delivered the opinion of the Appeals Board, in which Judge Marshall L. Davidson, III, and Judge David F. Hensley joined. … McCord v. Advantage Human Resourcing, No. 2014-06-0063, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 6, at *9-10 (Tenn. Workers' Comp. App. Bd. Mar. 27, 2015).
Cited 0 timesPublishedCity of Jersey City v. Polish Army War Veterans
18 N.J. Misc. 40 · New Jersey Tax Court · Jan 9, 1940
Washington Camp v. Board of Equalization of Taxes (Supreme Court, 1915), 87 N. J. L. 53; 93 Atl. Rep. 856 ; Perez Service Club v. … City of Passaic (State Board), filed January 10th, 1939; Knights of Columbus Building Association of Newark, New Jersey v. City of Newark (State Board), filed August 14th, 1939.
Cited 1 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 21, 1975
Cox v. Dillingham, 184 P.2d 976 , (1947) and McCurtain County Excise Board v. St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co., 30 P.2d 213 (1959). … In State v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedBaugus, Alice v. Tennessee Farmers Mutual Insurance Company
2023 TN WC App. 29 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Jul 18, 2023
) v. ) State File No. 59724-2021 ) Tennessee Farmers Mutual Ins. … Henderson v. SAIA, Inc., 318 S.W.3d 328 (Tenn. 2010).
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna