Opinion

Millinder, Charles v. Maplewood Health Care

  • 2021 TN WC 238
Court
Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims
Filed
Nov 1, 2021
Status
Published
On the bench
Allen Phillips
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 21.8%

The opinion

FILED

Nov 01, 2021

08:34 AM(CT)

TENNESSEE COURT OF

WORKERS' COMPENSATION

CLAIMS

TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION

IN THE COURT OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION CLAIMS

AT JACKSON

CHARLES MILLINDER, ) Docket No. 2020-07-0174

Employee, )

v. )

MAPLEWOOD HEALTH CARE, ) State File No. 74357-2014

Employer, )

And )

OCCUSURE CLAIMS SERVICES, ) Judge Allen Phillips

Carrier. )

COMPENSATION ORDER GRANTING SUMMARY JUDGMENT

The Court heard Maplewood’s Motion for Summary Judgment on October 28, 2021.

Maplewood asserted it was entitled to summary judgment because of a medical opinion

that Mr. Millinder’s injury did not arise primarily out of his employment. The Court agrees

and grants the motion.

Facts

Maplewood filed a Statement of Undisputed Facts as required under Tennessee

Rules of Civil Procedure 56.03, which the Court summarizes as follows:

• Mr. Millinder alleged a back injury on September 9, 2014, and Maplewood

provided a panel of physicians.

• The first physician Mr. Millinder chose placed him at maximum medical

improvement in 2016. That physician later retired.

• Maplewood provided Mr. Millinder another panel of physicians, from which he

chose Dr. Fereidoon Parsioon.

• Dr. Parsioon completed a Declaration under Tennessee Rules of Civil Procedure

72 in which he agreed Mr. Millinder reached maximum medical improvement

in 2016 with no permanent impairment related to the September 9, 2014 injury.

1

• Dr. Parsioon also stated that the injury did not cause any anatomical changes in

Mr. Millinder’s back; instead, all findings were either chronic, degenerative, or

congenital.

• Dr. Parsioon said none of Mr. Millinder’s conditions were primarily related to

the work injury but instead to the other conditions.

• Dr. Parsioon recommended no further treatment for the work injury.

Mr. Millinder did not file a written response.

Based on the undisputed facts, Maplewood argued it was entitled to summary

judgment because Dr. Parsioon said that the injury did not arise primarily out of the

employment. Mr. Millinder admitted he filed no response to the motion and could not

dispute Maplewood’s facts.

Analysis

Tennessee Rules of Civil Procedure 56 provides specific filing requirements for

both parties in summary judgment cases that “are not mere suggestions” but rather plain

and unambiguous requirements. Thomas v. Zipp Express, 2017 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd.

LEXIS 22, at *11 n.4 (Mar. 15, 2017).

Specifically, as the moving party, Maplewood must file a statement of undisputed

material facts with citations to the record. It did so. As the nonmoving party, Mr. Millinder

must respond to Maplewood’s statement of undisputed facts, indicating his agreement with

them or demonstrating how they are disputed. Tenn. R. Civ. P. 56.03. He did not do so.

Thus, the Court considers Maplewood’s motion unopposed and considers whether

summary judgment is appropriate.

Summary judgment is appropriate “if the pleadings, depositions, answers to

interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there

is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment

as a matter of law.” Tenn. R. Civ. P. 56.04. To prevail, Maplewood must do one of two

things: (1) submit affirmative evidence that negates an essential element of Mr. Millinder’s

claim, or (2) demonstrate that his evidence is insufficient to establish entitlement to

benefits. Tenn. Code Ann. § 20-16-101 (2021). See also Rye v. Women’s Care Ctr. Of

Memphis, MPLLC., 477 S.W.3d 235, 264 (Tenn. 2015).

Under law, Mr. Millinder must show that his injury was caused by a specific incident

arising primarily out of his employment. Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-102(14)(A) (Emphasis

added). Based on the undisputed facts, Maplewood negated the essential element of the

injury arising primarily out of the employment through Dr. Parsioon’s declaration.

Specifically, Dr. Parsioon said Mr. Millinder’s conditions were primarily related to other

2

conditions, not the injury. In the absence of any countervailing facts, Maplewood is entitled

to judgment as a matter of law.

THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED AS FOLLOWS:

1. The Court grants Maplewood’s Motion for Summary Judgment on grounds that

Mr. Millinder’s injury did not primarily arise out of his employment, and his

claim against Maplewood is dismissed with prejudice to its refiling.

2. Unless appealed, this order shall become final in thirty days.

3. The Court assesses the $150.00 filing fee against Maplewood, for which

execution might issue as necessary. Maplewood shall pay the filing fee to the

Clerk within five business days of the order becoming final.

4. Maplewood shall file Form SD-2, Statistical Data form, with the Clerk within

five business days of this order becoming final.

ENTERED November 1, 2021.

_____________________________________

JUDGE ALLEN PHILLIPS

Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of this Order was sent as indicated on November 1, 2021.

Name Email Service sent to:

Spencer R. Barnes, X spence@morrisonandbarnes.com

Employee’s Attorney kaylie@morrisonandbarnes.com

B. Duane Willis, X dwillis@morganakins.com

Employer’s Attorney

______________________________________

Penny Shrum, Court Clerk

Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims

WC.CourtClerk@tn.gov

3

Compensation Hearing Order Right to Appeal:

If you disagree with this Compensation Hearing Order, you may appeal to the Workers’

Compensation Appeals Board or the Tennessee Supreme Court. To appeal to the Workers’

Compensation Appeals Board, you must:

1. Complete the enclosed form entitled: “Notice of Appeal,” and file the form with the Clerk

of the Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims within thirty calendar days of the date the

compensation hearing order was filed. When filing the Notice of Appeal, you must serve

a copy upon the opposing party (or attorney, if represented).

2. You must pay, via check, money order, or credit card, a $75.00 filing fee within ten

calendar days after filing of the Notice of Appeal. Payments can be made in-person at any

Bureau office or by U.S. mail, hand-delivery, or other delivery service. In the alternative,

you may file an Affidavit of Indigency (form available on the Bureau’s website or any

Bureau office) seeking a waiver of the filing fee. You must file the fullycompleted

Affidavit of Indigency within ten calendar days of filing the Notice of Appeal. Failure to

timely pay the filing fee or file the Affidavit of Indigency will result in dismissal of

your appeal.

3. You bear the responsibility of ensuring a complete record on appeal. You may request

from the court clerk the audio recording of the hearing for a $25.00 fee. A licensed court

reporter must prepare a transcript and file it with the court clerk within fifteen calendar

days of the filing the Notice of Appeal. Alternatively, you may file a statement of the

evidence prepared jointly by both parties within fifteen calendar days of the filing of the

Notice of Appeal. The statement of the evidence must convey a complete and accurate

account of the hearing. The Workers’ Compensation Judge must approve the statement of

the evidence before the record is submitted to the Appeals Board. If the Appeals Board is

called upon to review testimony or other proof concerning factual matters, the absence of

a transcript or statement of the evidence can be a significant obstacle to meaningful

appellate review.

4. After the Workers’ Compensation Judge approves the record and the court clerk transmits

it to the Appeals Board, a docketing notice will be sent to the parties. The appealing party

has fifteen calendar days after the date of that notice to submit a brief to the Appeals Board.

See the Practices and Procedures of the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board.

To appeal your case directly to the Tennessee Supreme Court, the Compensation Hearing

Order must be final and you must comply with the Tennessee Rules of Appellate Procedure.

If neither party timely files an appeal with the Appeals Board, the trial court’s Order will

become final by operation of law thirty calendar days after entry. See Tenn. Code Ann. §

50-6-239(c)(7).

For self-represented litigants: Help from an Ombudsman is available at 800-332-2667.

NOTICE OF APPEAL

Tennessee Bureau of Workers’ Compensation www.tn.gov/workforce/injuries-at-

work/

wc.courtclerk@tn.gov | 1-800-332-2667

Docket No.: ________________________

State File No.: ______________________

Date of Injury: _____________________

___________________________________________________________________________

Employee

v.

___________________________________________________________________________ Employer

Notice is given that ____________________________________________________________________ [List

name(s) of all appealing party(ies). Use separate sheet if necessary.]

appeals the following order(s) of the Tennessee Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims to the Workers’

Compensation Appeals Board (check one or more applicable boxes and include the date filestamped on

the first page of the order(s) being appealed):

□ Expedited Hearing Order filed on _______________ □ Motion Order filed on ___________________

□ Compensation Order filed on__________________ □ Other Order filed on_____________________ issued

by Judge _________________________________________________________________________.

Statement of the Issues on Appeal

Provide a short and plain statement of the issues on appeal or basis for relief on appeal:

________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________

Parties

Appellant(s) (Requesting Party): _________________________________________ ☐Employer ☐Employee

Address: ________________________________________________________ Phone: ___________________

Email: __________________________________________________________

Attorney’s Name: ______________________________________________ BPR#: _______________________

Attorney’s Email: ______________________________________________ Phone: _______________________

Attorney’s Address: _________________________________________________________________________

* Attach an additional sheet for each additional Appellant *

LB-1099 rev. 01/20 Page 1 of 2 RDA 11082 Employee Name: _______________________________________ Docket No.:

_____________________ Date of Inj.: _______________

Appellee(s) (Opposing Party): ___________________________________________ ☐Employer ☐Employee

Appellee’s Address: ______________________________________________ Phone: ____________________

Email: _________________________________________________________

Attorney’s Name: _____________________________________________ BPR#: ________________________

Attorney’s Email: _____________________________________________ Phone: _______________________

Attorney’s Address: _________________________________________________________________________

* Attach an additional sheet for each additional Appellee *

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, _____________________________________________________________, certify that I have forwarded a

true and exact copy of this Notice of Appeal by First Class mail, postage prepaid, or in any manner as described

in Tennessee Compilation Rules & Regulations, Chapter 0800-02-21, to all parties and/or their attorneys in this

case on this the __________ day of ___________________________________, 20 ____.

____________________________________________

__ [Signature of appellant or attorney for appellant]

LB-1099 rev. 01/20 Page 2 of 2 RDA 11082

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.