Case law

MEENER, MUSSHUR v. v. FEDERAL EXPRESS HUB

2025 TN WC 74 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Oct 27, 2025

However, the Appeals Board held that an employee’s “subjective belief, no matter how sincerely held, is not a sufficient basis to support his claim for workers’ compensation benefits.” Rucker v. … Frye v. Vincent Printing Co., 2016 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 34, at *15-16 (Aug. 2, 2016).

Opinion No. 78-143 (1978) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 28, 1978

Co. v. Beatty, 34 Okl. 321 , 118 P. 367 (1911) . … with the Twenty-Five Dollars per day, would be consistent with the language of Article V , Section 21 of the Oklahoma Constitution which provides that Board shall serve without compensation but shall be entitled to receive

Opinion No. 68-136 (1968) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 17, 1968

all the educational requirements, as specified in 59 O.S. 164 [ 59-164 ] (1961), and has passed both parts of the National Board of Examinations of the National Board of Chiropractic Examiners without successfully examining … (Emphasis added) The language "shall examine all applicants" and "Board shall examine" are words of command and are compulsory upon the Board rather than directory. The Court in State v.

Opinion No. (1991) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 5, 1991

JONES V. FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORP., 748 F.2D 1400 (10TH CIR. 1984). … THEREFORE, THE BOARD MAY DETERMINE WHETHER A PARTICULAR CORRESPONDENCE OR VIDEO OR TELEVISION COURSE MEETS THE CLASSROOM HOUR DEFINITION PROMULGATED BY THE BOARD. (SHERIDAN A. MCCAFFREE)

People v. Finkelstein

38 Misc. 2d 791 · Criminal Court of the City of New York · Mar 27, 1963

Likewise, a similar statute has been held consistent with the United States Constitution by the Supreme Court of the United States in Braunfeld v. Brown ( 336 U. S. 599 ). … S. 907 ; Powell v. Oser, 9 Misc 2d 585 ; People v. Kupprat, 6 N Y 2d 88). The defendant urges 1 ‘ economic coercion ” as a defense and he relies heavily on the case of Braunfeld v. Brown ( 366 U.

Opinion No. 70-235 (1970) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 20, 1970

Hedges v. … In Landess v. State of Oklahoma ex rel.

Clark v. Department of Revenue

14 Or. Tax 221 · Oregon Tax Court · Jul 9, 1997

The Tax Court held that where the board’s order sustained the assessed value, the assessor was not “aggrieved” and lacked the necessary standing to appeal the board’s order. As explained in Bear Creek Plaza v. … In Mid Oil Co. v.

Erie Railroad System v. Walsh

26 N.J. Misc. 81 · New Jersey Tax Court · Jan 6, 1948

Rep. 578 ; Williams v. State Board of Assessors, 51 N. J. L. 512; 18 Atl. Rep. 750 ; Pitney et al. v. Kelly, 21 N. J. Mis. R. 405; 34 Atl. Rep. (2d) 547; State v. State Board of Tax Appeals, 134 N. J. L, 34; 45 Atl. … See Long Dock Co. v. State Board of Assessors, supra.

In re the Estate of Kearney

169 Misc. 947 · New York Surrogate's Court · Jan 23, 1939

Y. 247, 255 ; Matter of Tamargo, supra; Brown v. Quintard, 177 N. Y. 75, 85 ; People’s Trust Co. v. Flynn, 188 id. 385, 393; Matter of Gosden, 158 Misc. 99 .) … Brown devolves as intestate property. (Matter of Tamargo, supra; Matter of Hartmannsgrubber, 146 Misc. 87 ; Beekman v. Bonsor, supra; Kerr v. Dougherty, 79 N. Y. 327, 346 ; Morton v.

EILAND, STEPHEN v. LABOR FINDERS OF TENNESSEE

2026 TN WC 67 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · May 15, 2026

Code Ann. § 50-6-239(d)(1) (2025); McCord v. Advantage Human Resourcing, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. … The Court Clerk will prepare the record for submission to the Appeals Board, and you will receive notice once it has been submitted.

Opinion No. 76-168 (1976) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 29, 1976

Groves v. … (p. 1042) A board of education being a public office (Barnhill v.

City of Tyler v. Texas Employers' Ins. Ass'n

288 S.W. 409 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Nov 17, 1926

Russell v. Farquhar, 55 Tex. 355 ; Bear Bros. & Hirsch v. Marx & Kempner, 63 Tex. 298 ; Edwards v. Morton, 92 Tex. 152 , 46 S. W. 792 . … Cedar County v. Johnson, 50 Mo. 225 ; Commonwealth v. Beamish, 81 Pa. 389 ; Campbell v. Paris & D. R. Co., 71 Ill. 611 .

In re the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of the United States Trust Co.

2 Mills Surr. 367 · New York Surrogate's Court · Nov 15, 1901

United States Trust Co. v. Tobias, 21 Abb. N. C. *370 392 ; Soper v. Brown, 136 N. Y. 244 .

Opinion No. 71-253 (1971) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 27, 1971

In the case of Murphy v. … In Wickersham v.

Yoder, Chris v. Crum and Forster Holdings Corp.

2024 TN WC 93 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Dec 20, 2024

In McCord v. Advantage Human Resourcing, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. … Further, in Lewis v. Molly Maid, 2016 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd.

Opinion No. (1992)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 24, 1992

LOCAL 2479 V. THORPE, 632 P.2D 408, 412, (OKLA.1981). … ROGERS V. EXCISE BOARD OF GREER COUNTY, 701 P.2D 754 (OKLA. 1984).

MOORE, ERIN V. AMAZON.COM SERVICES, LLC

2025 TN WC 83 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Nov 24, 2025

.: 2025-60-2991 Employee, ) v. ) State File No.: 16015-2025 ) AMAZON.COM SERVICES, … The Court Clerk will prepare the record for submission to the Appeals Board, and you will receive notice once it has been submitted.

Opinion No. 74-113 (1974) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 31, 1974

EXECUTIVE SESSION — SCHOOL BOARD The provisions of 25 O.S. 201 [ 25-201 ] (1971) prohibit a board of education from discussing student disciplinary matters or conducting student disciplinary hearings in executive session. … Our research reveals no decisions requiring school board meetings considering student disciplinary matters to be conducted in executive session. The recent case of Canney v.

Huffaker, Jack T. v. CAC of Knox County

2021 TN WC 193 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Jun 24, 2021

Scott v. Integrity Staffing Solutions, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 24, at *6 (Aug. 18, 2015). … To appeal to the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board, you must: 1.

In re Noon

60 Pa. D. & C.2d 514 · Pennsylvania Environmental Hearing Board · Oct 16, 1972

DISCUSSION There is no question of fact before the board in this matter. … See also Pittsburgh and Atomic Energy Commission v. P. U. C. and Duquesne Light Company, 3 Comm. Ct. 546 (1971), at pages 551 and 552, and cases cited therein.