Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
0.76s
MONROE, JEROME v. KELLOGG COMPANY
2026 TN WC 30 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Mar 30, 2026
Monroe countered with Roper v. Allegis Group, 2017 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 14 (Feb. 10, 2017), where the Appeals Board said that lack of a valid excuse to follow a safety rule is not necessarily a willful failure. … Giggers v. Memphis Hous. Auth., 277 S.W.3d 359, 364 (Tenn. 2009). Thus, Mr. Monroe is entitled to recover benefits.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Dec 2, 1980
The Retirement and Pension Board of the Department of Public Safety, Okl., 603 P.2d 758 (1979). The Oklahoma Supreme Court has ruled, in Adams v. … Sneed v. Sneed, Okl., 585 P.2d 1363 (1978).
Cited 0 timesPublishedMassachusetts Land Court · Jan 20, 2021
Connors v. … DeGiacomo v. City of Quincy, 476 Mass. 38 , 41 (2016), quoting Kobrin v. Board of Reg. in Med., 444 Mass. 837 , 843 (2005).
Cited 0 timesPublishedWilliams v. Bladen Cty. B.O.E.
North Carolina Industrial Commission · Jun 17, 2003
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Oct 2, 2002
The parameters under which public trusts may operate was explained in Board of County Commissioners v. Warram, 285 P.2d 1034 (Okla. 1955). … The court relied on its earlier opinion in Excise Board of Stephens County v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedBumgarner, Brent v. Amazon.com Services, LLC
2022 TN WC 65 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Sep 2, 2022
The Appeals Board explained that this provision means that “in circumstances where an employee is noncompliant with medical treatment, compensation shall be held in abeyance, not terminated.” Newell v. … See Lewis v. Molly Maid, 2016 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd.
Cited 0 timesPublishedHudson, Michelle v. FRESENIUS MEDICAL CARE HOLDINGS, LLC
2024 TN WC 83 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Dec 5, 2024
In Marshall v. Mueller Company, 2016 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. … The Court Clerk will prepare the record for submission to the Appeals Board, and you will receive notice once it has been submitted.
Cited 0 timesPublishedThompson v. Kent State University
36 Ohio Misc. 2d 16 · Ohio Court of Claims · Jul 24, 1987
Brown, J. This action came on to be heard on May 19, 1986, on the issue of liability only. … Brown, J., retired, of the Coshocton County Court of Common Pleas, sitting by assignment.
Cited 4 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 26, 1978
This was noted by the Supreme Court of Oklahoma in Stanolind Crude Oil Purchasing Company v. State Board of Equalization, 174 Okl. 320 , 49 P.2d 1089 (1935) and Sinclair Prairie Oil Company v. … In so ruling, the Court viewed that the duty to establish a method of valuation is with the State Board of Equalization and it is within the discretion of said Board to determine such a method.
Cited 0 timesPublishedChavez, Raul Morelos v. Jesus Morelos Chavez
2023 TN WC App. 20 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · May 12, 2023
Sneed v. Bd. of Prof’l Responsibility of the Sup. Ct. of Tenn., 301 S.W.3d 603, 615 (Tenn. 2010). … See Webb v. Sherrell, No. E2013-02724-COA-R3-CV, 2015 Tenn. App. LEXIS 645, at *5 (Tenn. Ct. App. Aug. 12, 2015).
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 24, 1994
. ¶ 5 In Ethics Com'n v. Cullison, 850 P.2d 1069 (Okla 1993), the extent of the Legislature's role in the Ethics Commission rulemaking process was called into question. … The Board of Pharmacy; 47. The Oklahoma State Board of Podiatry; 48. The Polygraph Examiners Board; 49. The Oklahoma Board of Private Vocational Schools; 50.
Cited 0 timesPublished151 S.W.2d 794 · Texas Commission of Appeals · May 28, 1941
Co. v. Harris et al., 127 Tex. 13 , 89 S.W.2d 973, 975 ; Southland Greyhound Lines v. Cotten, 126 *795 Tex. 596 , 91 S.W.2d 326 ; Southern Ice & Utilities Co. v. … Richardson, 126 Tex. 82 , 95 S.W.2d 956 ; Tarry Warehouse & Storage Co. v. Duvall, 131 Tex. 466 , 115 S.W.2d 401 .
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 9, 1980
In Excise Board of Stephens County v. Chicago, R.I. P. Ry. … Board of Commissioners of Logan County v. State ex rel.
Cited 0 timesPublishedIn re the Last Will & Testament & Codicils of Bertuch
132 Misc. 731 · New York Surrogate's Court · Sep 4, 1928
Neither did a similar situation exist in the decision in Reid v. Brown ( 54 Misc. 481, 482 ). … Having in mind that it is my duty and the duty of the courts to carry out the wishes of the testator, I have my doubts as to the applicability of the decisions in Matter of Cole and Reid v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedRucker, Jr., Willie v. Federal Express Corporation
2023 TN WC App. 19 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · May 3, 2023
Sneed v. Bd. of Prof’l Responsibility of the Sup. Ct. of Tenn., 301 S.W.3d 603, 615 (Tenn. 2010). … See Webb v. Sherrell, No. E2013-02724-COA-R3-CV, 2015 Tenn. App. LEXIS 645, at *5 (Tenn. Ct. App. Aug. 12, 2015).
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 8, 2001
of the State Board of Agriculture. … Cox v. Dawson, 911 P.2d 272 , 276 (Okla. 1996) (footnote omitted). ¶ 4 It is, therefore, the official Opinion of the Attorney General that: 1.
Cited 0 timesPublishedTOLEDO, FRANCISCO BELLO v. SAFETY NATIONAL CASUALTY CO.
2024 TN WC 33 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Apr 17, 2024
McCord v. Advantage Human Resourcing, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 6, at *7-8, 9 (Mar. 27, 2015). Genuine Parts contended that Mr. … The Court Clerk will prepare the record for submission to the Appeals Board, and you will receive notice once it has been submitted.
Cited 0 timesPublishedAlpha-Bella VI, Inc. v. Clinton Township
14 N.J. Tax 597 · New Jersey Tax Court · May 5, 1995
The county board hearing was clearly an administrative proceeding. County tax boards are administrative agencies that “ ‘exercise gwasi-judicial jurisdiction’ ” in hearing tax appeals. *593 Union City Assocs. v. … V. In conclusion, UJB has standing to pursue this tax appeal. The county board’s notice of intent to invoke rollback taxes was not defective.
Cited 3 timesPublishedBECKMAN, NENA v. MANHEIM TENNESSEE, LLC
Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Aug 7, 2026
BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION IN THE COURT OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION CLAIMS AT COOKEVILLE NENA BECKMAN, Docket No. 2025-40-1275 Employee, v. … The Court Clerk will prepare the record for submission to the Appeals Board, and you will receive notice once it has been submitted.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 14, 1979
as is reasonably necessary to accomplish the duties of the board." … In determining legislative intention, words, phrases, and expressions will be accorded their ordinary meaning ". . .", Board of Education F.T.C. v. Allen, Okla. 156 P.2d 596 (1945).
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna