Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersSS

10,000+ results

3.32s

  • Opinion No. (2002)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 13, 2002

    The Board shall establish an examination to be used by the Board to determine the proficiency [sic] any a chiropractic physician who seeks certification from the Board. … Grand River Dam Auth. v. State, 645 P.2d 1011 , 1016 (Okla. 1982).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Kips Bay Towers, Inc. v. Armstrong

    82 Misc. 2d 489 · Civil Court of the City of New York · May 16, 1975

    (Schwartz v Public Administrator, 24 NY2d 65 .) … (Tai On Luck Corp. v Cirota, 35 AD2d 380 ; Seabrook v Commuter Housing Co., 72 Misc 2d 6 .)

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • People v. Beckett

    44 Misc. 3d 560 · Criminal Court of the City of New York · Jun 6, 2014

    “Brown paper” is also not, in and of itself, the common packaging for marijuana. … (See People v Stiles, 70 NY2d 765 [1987]; People v Eckert, 117 Misc 2d 504 [Syracuse City Ct 1983].)

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 73-106 (1973) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 30, 1973

    Your question centers upon the existing authority of the Board pursuant to 82 O.S. 864 [ 82-864 ] (1971) to separate the job classification into a secretary and a treasurer. We refer you to Johnson v. … (Cites omitted) " In Dunlap v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Rider College v. City of Trenton

    19 N.J. Misc. 304 · New Jersey Tax Court · Apr 1, 1941

    Institute of Roly Angels v. Bender (Supreme Court, 1909), 79 N. J. L. 34; 74 Atl. Rep. 251 ; Mayor of Princeton, Sc., v. State Board (Supreme Court, 1921), 96 N. J. L. 334; 115 Atl. Rep. 342 . … Dwight School of Englewood v. Stale Board, Sc. {Supreme Court, 1935), 114 N. J. L. 594; 177 Atl. Rep. 875 , and cases cited.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 68-276 (1968) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 25, 1968

    In the case of People v. … And, in the case of the City of Dayton v. Horstman, Ohio Com.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 76-191 (1976) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 20, 1976

    In Delaware County Excise Board v. St. Louis v. San Francisco Railroad Company, 49 P.2d 523 , the Supreme Court discussed the levy of the gasoline tax and its purpose: ". . . … Board of County Commissioners of Harmon County v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Hirsch v. American Airlines

    160 Misc. 2d 272 · Civil Court of the City of New York · Dec 30, 1993

    Accordingly, they boarded the plane at the appropriate time. … Enforcement of State law claims such as plaintiffs, which arise out of an airline’s decision whether *278 or not to board allegedly unruly passengers, "would result in significant de facto regulation of the airlines’ boarding

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Juliano v. State

    190 Misc. 180 · New York Court of Claims · Jun 18, 1947

    (Shaknis v. State of New York, supra; Arthur W. Brown v. State of New York, 58 N. Y. S. 2d 691, affd. 271 App. Div. 811 ; Burt I. Brown v. State of New York, 58 N. Y. S. 2d 691, affd. 271 App. Div. 811 .) … State of New York, supra; Brown v. State of New York [two cases], supra.)

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Baker v. Stackpoole

    9 Cow. 419 · Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · Dec 15, 1827

    From the testimony of Brown and Bokee, it appears to have been the subject of dispute between the respondent and Baker. … Hillyer v. Vaughn, 1 J. J. Marsh, 583. Hanmer’s adm’rs. v. Rochester, 2 id. 145 . Burke’s adm’rs v. Albert, 4 id. 97 . Bacon v. Brown, 1 Bibb, 324 , Post 746, 773-777.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1991)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 23, 1991

    This conclusion is buttressed by the Oklahoma Supreme Court decision in Draper v. State Board of Equalization, 414 P.2d 276 (Okla. 1966). … Smith v. Board of Equalization, 630 P.2d 1264 (Okla. 1981).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Health Tea Corp. v. Dante

    132 Misc. 2d 772 · Civil Court of the City of New York · Jun 17, 1986

    Freedman, Civil Court Judge, in a joint trial of Health Tea Corp. v Carter (L&T index No. 94255/81) and Health Tea Corp. v Pames (L&T 20931/82). … (See, NY City Loft Board Regs [Relating to Subletting, Subdivision, and Assignment] § C [2].)

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People v. Weeks

    123 Misc. 2d 540 · Criminal Court of the City of New York · Mar 27, 1984

    (People v Bostic, 97 Misc 2d 1039, 1044 .) Indeed, the defendant’s time for serving motions, normally 45 days from arraignment, is extended from the last date of service of notice. (CPL 255.20.) … (People v Brown, 92 AD2d 939 ; People v Brown, 83 AD2d 699 ; People v Merced, 119 Misc 2d 238 .)

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Huffaker, Jack T. v. CAC of Knox County

    2021 TN WC 193 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Jun 24, 2021

    Scott v. Integrity Staffing Solutions, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 24, at *6 (Aug. 18, 2015). … To appeal to the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board, you must: 1.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • In Re Trkula

    699 A.2d 3 · Court of Judicial Discipline of Pennsylvania · Jun 27, 1997

    The Judicial Conduct Board is empowered by Article V, § 18 of the Constitution of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania to file formal charges alleging conduct proscribed by that section on the part of judges, justices or justices … The Board charges that the making of the aforesaid false statements subjects Respondent to discipline under Article V, § 18(d)(1) *11 of the Pennsylvania Constitution because that conduct constitutes: 1. such that brings

    Cited 30 timesPublished
  • BIANCO, MIRIAM v. ACADEMY OF MARYLAND FARMS

    2026 TN WC 41 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Apr 17, 2026

    McCord v. Advantage Human Resourcing, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. … The Court Clerk will prepare the record for submission to the Appeals Board, and you will receive notice once it has been submitted.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • In re the Judicial Settlement of the Intermediate Account of Proceedings of Moodie

    129 Misc. 853 · New York Surrogate's Court · Jun 16, 1927

    Div. 473 ; McKeon v. Van Slyck, 223 N. Y. 392 .) … The husband’s board was worked out by his duties upon the place.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Borough of Little Ferry v. T. J. Sokol Ass'n

    19 N.J. Misc. 264 · New Jersey Tax Court · Mar 18, 1941

    Respondent justifies the action of the Bergen County Board as proper under R. … Fifty-Six Seminary Avenue Corp. v. City of Rahway, New Jersey Tax Reports 1934-1939, p. 666.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Butler v. Sacred Heart of Jesus English Rite Catholic Church

    178 Misc. 2d 851 · Civil Court of the City of New York · Oct 21, 1998

    (People’s Bank v St. Anthony’s R. C. … (Malerba v Friars Minor, supra, at 443; see also, Karsch v Pottier & Stymus Mfg. & Improvement Co., 82 App Div 230, 233 [1st Dept 1903].)

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Oliva v. Baird

    Massachusetts Land Court · Jul 2, 2021

    , Inc. v. … See Wheatley v. Planning Board of Hingham, 7 Mass. App. Ct. 435 , 450-451 (1979).

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.