Case law

Opinion No. 76-217 (1976) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 25, 1976

In Allen v. … Co. v. Board of County Commissioners of Stephens County, Okl., 389 P.2d 476 , 477 (1964), and Jack v. State, 183 Okl. 375 , 82 P.2d 1033 (1937).

Cutsinger, Christopher v. AT&T Mobility Services, LLC

2024 TN WC App. 28 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Jul 22, 2024

As the Tennessee Supreme Court explained in Keller v. … Dept. of Corr. v. Pressley, 528 S.W.3d 506, 513-14 (Tenn. 2017)).

Opinion No. (1990)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 14, 1990

SPIERS V. MAQNOLIA PETROLEUM CO., 244 P.2D 852 (OKL. 1951). THIS MAXIM IS NOT A RULE OF LAW AND CANNOT OVERRIDE THE LEGISLATIVE INTENT OF A STATUTE. SPIERS, AT 856. … AS SUCH, IT IS MY OPINION THAT THE BOARD MAY NOT REQUIRE MEMBERSHIP BY A PRIVATE SCHOOL IN A PRIVATE ASSOCIATION AS A PREREQUISITE TO LICENSURE BY THE BOARD. (JAMES ROBERT JOHNSON)

Opinion No. (1997)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Oct 7, 1997

Allen v. … Grand River Dam Authority v. State, 645 P.2d 1011 , 1018 (Okla. 1982). Where the intent is clearly stated in the statute, no further statutory construction is necessary. Hughes Drilling Company v.

Opinion No. (1991) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 21, 1991

NO. 80-221; BURKHARDT V. CITY OF ENID, 771 P.2D 608, 611 (OKLA. 1989); VETERANS OF FOREIGN WARS V. CHILDERS, 171 P.2D 618 (OKLA. 1946); HAWKS V. BLAND, 9 P.2D 720 (OKLA. 1932); YETTE V. … WAY V. GRAND LAKE ASSOCIATION. INC., 635 P.2D 1010, 1015-1018 (OKLA. 1981).

Opinion No. (1988)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 20, 1988

Taber v. Carter Oil Co., 57 P.2d 248 (Okla. 1936); Fearnside v. Graham, 1 P.2d 763 (Okla. 1931). … Midwest City v. Harris, 561 P.2d 1357 (Okla. 1977). The intended effect of 68 O.S. 2467 was to provide an adequate remedy to the taxpayer without disrupting the local budget process.

Opinion No. 68-330 (1968) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Oct 17, 1968

Excise Board of Washita County v. Lowden, 189 Okl. 286 , 116 P.2d 700 , 702." … In the case of Board of Commissioners of Tulsa County v.

In re Renard

179 Misc. 885 · New York Surrogate's Court · Feb 8, 1943

The answer requests that the moneys and properties constituting the distributable balance in the hands of the accountant be deposited with Brown Bros. … (Arndt-Ober v. Metropolitan Opera Co., 182 App. Div. 513 ; Hughes v. Techt, 188 App. Div. 743 , affd. 229 N. Y. 222 , certiorari denied 254 U. S. 643 ; Brown v. Morgan, & Co., Inc., 177 Misc. 763 ; Kaufman v.

Opinion No. (2001)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 8, 2001

Oglesby v. Lib. Mut. Ins. Co., 832 P.2d 834 , 844 (Okla. 1992). … McNeill v. City of Tulsa, 953 P.2d 329 , 332 (Okla. 1998) (citing Simpson v. Okla. Alcoholic Bev. Control Bd., 409 P.2d 364 , 367 (Okla. 1965)).

Krouse v. South Hills Health System

12 Pa. D. & C.3d 679 · Pennsylvania Arbitration Panels for Health Care · Feb 26, 1979

Defendant Brown thus contends that Kennywood is jointly or severally or solely hable to defendant Brown in the event that plaintiff recovers a verdict against Brown. … The case presented here can be disposed of based on the analogous situation that was present in Gillette v. Redinger, 34 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 469 , 383 A. 2d 1295 (1978).

HOLLAND, JUDITH v. RANDSTAD

2025 TN WC 89 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Dec 10, 2025

Orman v. Williams Sonoma, Inc., 803 S.W.2d 672, 676 (Tenn. 1991). As shown below, all the factors favor Dr. Schroerlucke. Dr. … Schroerlucke’s specific board certification as a spine surgeon favors him on the factor of qualifications. Drs. Lochemes and Lager are board-certified orthopedic surgeons but without a certification in spine surgery.

Opinion No. (1994)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 4, 1994

BY THE BOARD AND MAY NOT MEET THE SAME STANDARDS AS SCHOOLS REGULATED BY THE BOARD ARE REQUIRED TO MEET TO BE LICENSED. … WHAT CONSTITUTES A SCHOOL IS NOT EXPLAINED BY THE CODE, BUT WORDS FOUND IN STATUTES ARE TO BE UNDERSTOOD IN THEIR ORDINARY SENSE EXCEPT WHEN A CONTRARY INTENTION PLAINLY APPEARS. 25 O.S. 1 (1991); HESS V.

Laboyteaux, Karen v. Benjamin Begley and Tiffany Begley d/b/a Homestead Family Table and Monstermash Concepts, LLC

2022 TN WC 63 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Aug 30, 2022

See McCord v. Advantage Human Resourcing, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 6, at *13 (Mar. 27, 2015). Ms. … See the Rules governing the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board on the Bureau’s website If neither party timely files an appeal with the Appeals Board, the trial court’s Order will become final by operation of law thirty

Henry, Martin v. Kirby Buildling Sustems

2025 TN WC 76 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Nov 5, 2025

Id. § 50-6-204(b)(1); Barron v. State Dep’t of Human Servs., 184 $.W.3d 219, 223 (Tenn. 2006). … B & B Enters. of Wilson Cnty., LLC v. City of Leb., 318 S.W.3d 839, 848-849 (Tenn. 2010).

Boone, Graham v. Luther Danny Farmer

2020 TN WC 130 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Dec 7, 2020

See Smith v. Everidge, Inc., 2020 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 5, at *6-7 (Feb. 10, 2020). Therefore, the Court holds that Mr. … To appeal to the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board, you must: 1.

Opinion No. (1979)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 26, 1979

must, nonetheless, be licensed by the Board. … The Board may not, by rule or regulation, exempt certain persons from licensing requirements under the statute. The Board has only those powers delegated to it. Adams v.

In re Richard P.

110 Misc. 2d 833 · New York Family Court · Sep 11, 1981

(Matter of Gault, 387 US 1 ; Kent v United States, 383 US 541 ; McKeiver v Pennsylvania, 403 US 528 .) In People ex rel. … , board, bureau, authority or commission”.

Opinion No. 70-153 (1970) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 23, 1970

In Sutto v. Board of Medical Registration and Examination, 242 Ind. … and material requirements, i.e., four thousand 60-minute hours resident attendance in class " In Pennsylvania Board of Undertakers v.

Appeal of Textile Research Institute, Inc. v. Township of Princeton

25 N.J. Misc. 94 · New Jersey Tax Court · Dec 17, 1946

Board of Trustees of Blair Academy v. State Board, 6 N. J. Mis. R. *96 498; affirmed, 106 N. J. L. 556, and New Providence v. Lions Club, 19 N. J. Mis. R. 103. … This claim fails to meet the tests enunciated by the Supreme Court in Dwight School v. State Board of Tax Appeals, 114 N. J. L. 594.

Weischedel v. Multnomah County Assessor

Oregon Tax Court · Nov 19, 2012

Defendant was represented by Jeff Brown (Brown) and Barry Dayton (Dayton), both of whom are appraisers employed by Defendant and who testified at trial. … Plaintiff unsuccessfully appealed those values to the Board and timely appealed the Board’s order sustaining the values to this court.