Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
2.43s
Diament v. Borough of Fort Lee
3 N.J. Tax 70 · New Jersey Tax Court · Jul 17, 1981
Associates v. … the board was not offered here.
Cited 10 timesPublishedBorough of Bergenfield v. Martin
19 N.J. Misc. 1 · New Jersey Tax Court · Dec 10, 1940
See Virtue v. Freeholders of Essex (Supreme Court, 1901), 67 N. J. L. 139, 148; 50 Atl. Rep. 360. … Mellor v. Kaighn (Court of Errors and Appeals, 1916), 89 N. J. L. 543; 99 Atl. Rep. 207 ; Washington Township v. Mercer County Board of Taxation (Supreme Court, 1914), 85 N. J. L. 547; 89 Atl.
Cited 1 timesPublished203 Misc. 549 · New York Family Court · Feb 18, 1953
(People v. Turner, 277 App. Div. 317 , 319-320.) … The respondent failed to furnish such proof to the board of education, and the board of education was therefore justified in filing the petition in this court.
Cited 3 timesPublishedCity of Tyler v. Texas Employers' Ins. Ass'n
288 S.W. 409 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Nov 17, 1926
Russell v. Farquhar, 55 Tex. 355 ; Bear Bros. & Hirsch v. Marx & Kempner, 63 Tex. 298 ; Edwards v. Morton, 92 Tex. 152 , 46 S. W. 792 . … Cedar County v. Johnson, 50 Mo. 225 ; Commonwealth v. Beamish, 81 Pa. 389 ; Campbell v. Paris & D. R. Co., 71 Ill. 611 .
Cited 55 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Dec 19, 2007
In a case involving the Governor and a corporation commissioner, the Oklahoma Supreme Court, in Nesbitt v. … Jackson v. Indep. Sch. Dist. No. 16 , 648 P.2d 26 , 29 (Okla. 1982). In your inquiry, the language of 51 O.S. 2001 , § 8[ 51-8 ] is plain and its meaning must be accepted.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Dec 20, 1978
With respect to that which constitutes in law a public office or public officer, this office has previously noted and applied those tests and criteria set forth in the cases of State v. Sowards, 64 Okl. … Cr. 430 , 82 P.2d 324 (1938) and Oklahoma City v. Century Indemnity Company, 178 Okl. 212 , 62 P.2d 94 (1936). In Sowards, supra, the Court stated, in paragraphs 2 and 3 of its syllabus: "2.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 13, 1974
Title 63 O.S. 1 -208.1 [ 63-1-208.1 ](a) (1971) state in part: "The state board of health may establish regional guidance centers for regions designated by the board, such regions to be selected by the board on the basis … See Lairmore v. Board of Commissioners of Okmulgee County, 200 Okl. 436 , 195 P.2d 762 (1948); Board of Commissioners of Harmon County v. R. J. Edwards, Inc., 140 Okl. 247 , 282 P. 1090 (1930).
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 22, 1992
IN DETERMINING WHETHER THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY HAS A DUTY TO PROVIDE LEGAL ADVICE TO MEMBERS OF COUNTY FAIR BOARDS, WE MUST DETERMINE WHETHER BOARD MEMBERS ARE COUNTY OFFICERS. … THE ANALYSIS IN THAT OPINION WHICH SUPPORTED THE CONCLUSION THAT THE POSITION OF DIRECTOR OF A COUNTY FREE FAIR ASSOCIATION WAS A PUBLIC OFFICE CONSIDERED THE CRITERIA ESTABLISHED IN THE CASE OF GUTHRIE DAILY LEADER V.
Cited 0 timesPublishedSouthlake Indiana LLC v. Lake County Assessor
Indiana Tax Court · Dec 8, 2020
STANDARD OF REVIEW The party seeking to overturn an Indiana Board final determination bears the burden of demonstrating its invalidity. Osolo Twp. Assessor v. … Assessor v. Sedd Realty Co., 125 N.E.3d 676, 680 (Ind.
Cited 0 timesPublishedMcGauvran, James v. ATOS Syntel, Inc.
2021 TN WC 225 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Sep 10, 2021
ATOS appealed, and the Appeals Board vacated and remanded. … The Appeals Board has held that “a decision to award attorneys’ fees and expenses at an interlocutory stage of a case should be made only in extremely limited circumstances.” Travis v. Carter Express, 2019 TN Wrk. Comp.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 25, 1976
In Allen v. … Co. v. Board of County Commissioners of Stephens County, Okl., 389 P.2d 476 , 477 (1964), and Jack v. State, 183 Okl. 375 , 82 P.2d 1033 (1937).
Cited 0 timesPublishedCutsinger, Christopher v. AT&T Mobility Services, LLC
2024 TN WC App. 28 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Jul 22, 2024
As the Tennessee Supreme Court explained in Keller v. … Dept. of Corr. v. Pressley, 528 S.W.3d 506, 513-14 (Tenn. 2017)).
Cited 0 timesPublished2025 TN WC 79 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Nov 17, 2025
The Appeals Board has held that the petition is the “general equivalent of a complaint as contemplated in the Tennessee Rules of Civil Procedure.” Vickers v. Amazon, 2019 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. … The Court Clerk will prepare the record for submission to the Appeals Board, and you will receive notice once it has been submitted.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Oct 7, 1997
Allen v. … Grand River Dam Authority v. State, 645 P.2d 1011 , 1018 (Okla. 1982). Where the intent is clearly stated in the statute, no further statutory construction is necessary. Hughes Drilling Company v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 21, 1991
NO. 80-221; BURKHARDT V. CITY OF ENID, 771 P.2D 608, 611 (OKLA. 1989); VETERANS OF FOREIGN WARS V. CHILDERS, 171 P.2D 618 (OKLA. 1946); HAWKS V. BLAND, 9 P.2D 720 (OKLA. 1932); YETTE V. … WAY V. GRAND LAKE ASSOCIATION. INC., 635 P.2D 1010, 1015-1018 (OKLA. 1981).
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 20, 1988
Taber v. Carter Oil Co., 57 P.2d 248 (Okla. 1936); Fearnside v. Graham, 1 P.2d 763 (Okla. 1931). … Midwest City v. Harris, 561 P.2d 1357 (Okla. 1977). The intended effect of 68 O.S. 2467 was to provide an adequate remedy to the taxpayer without disrupting the local budget process.
Cited 0 timesPublishedJones, Grey & Bayley, P.S. v. Department of Revenue
16 Or. Tax 300 · Oregon Tax Court · Dec 12, 2000
See, e.g., Brown and McAlpin v. Dept. of Rev., 3 OTR 481 (1969). … See Brown, 3 OTR 481 .
Cited 1 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Oct 17, 1968
Excise Board of Washita County v. Lowden, 189 Okl. 286 , 116 P.2d 700 , 702." … In the case of Board of Commissioners of Tulsa County v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 8, 2001
Oglesby v. Lib. Mut. Ins. Co., 832 P.2d 834 , 844 (Okla. 1992). … McNeill v. City of Tulsa, 953 P.2d 329 , 332 (Okla. 1998) (citing Simpson v. Okla. Alcoholic Bev. Control Bd., 409 P.2d 364 , 367 (Okla. 1965)).
Cited 0 timesPublishedKrouse v. South Hills Health System
12 Pa. D. & C.3d 679 · Pennsylvania Arbitration Panels for Health Care · Feb 26, 1979
Defendant Brown thus contends that Kennywood is jointly or severally or solely hable to defendant Brown in the event that plaintiff recovers a verdict against Brown. … The case presented here can be disposed of based on the analogous situation that was present in Gillette v. Redinger, 34 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 469 , 383 A. 2d 1295 (1978).
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna