Opinion

VILLAREAL, JAIRO NOE MORALES

  • 2025 TN WC 79
Court
Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims
Filed
Nov 17, 2025
Status
Published
On the bench
Durham
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 37.0%

The opinion

FILED

Nov 17, 2025

02:44 PM(CT)

TENNESSEE COURT OF

WORKERS' COMPENSATION

CLAIMS

TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION

IN THE COURT OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION CLAIMS

AT NASHVILLE

JAIRO NOE MORALES ) Docket No.: 2025-60-2740

VILLAREAL, )

Petitioner, )

v. ) State File No.: 860121-2025

)

HECTOR CERDA, ) Judge Robert Durham

Respondent. )

EXPEDITED HEARING ORDER DENYING BENEFITS

This Court held an Expedited Hearing on November 5, 2025. Mr. Morales

requested benefits after falling from a ladder and fracturing several vertebrae in his thoracic

spine. 1 For the reasons below, the Court holds that Mr. Morales did not establish he is

likely to prove that Mr. Cerda was his employer at the time of his injury.

History of Claim

On July 2, 2024, Mr. Morales fell more than 25 feet from a ladder while painting a

house. The accident resulted in several vertebrae fractures, a fractured sternum, and 12

days in the hospital. Mr. Morales testified that he did not return to work after the injury

and he remains disabled. He is seeking temporary disability benefits and continued

medical treatment in Mexico, where he had to move to receive assistance from his family.

Mr. Morales testified that when he was released from the hospital, Mr. Cerda

brought him home, fed him, and gave him $300 a week for two months, but that is the

extent of benefits received for his injury. He also testified that he requires physical therapy

in Mexico but cannot afford it.

1

Mr. Morales requested that the hearing be held by telephone. The Court granted the motion and in the

order informed Mr. Cerda that he could appear by telephone as well. Mr. Cerda responded in an email

saying that he was out of the country, and although he knew Mr. Morales, Mr. Morales had never worked

for him. He did not appear for the hearing.

1

Regarding his employment status, Mr. Morales named Mr. Cerda as his employer

in his petition for benefit determination and testified at the hearing that he worked for Mr.

Cerda as a painter. He said Mr. Cerda identified himself as the owner of the business, hired

him, gave him instructions, and provided materials. He asserted that he worked 35 to 40

hours per week, and Mr. Cerda paid him in cash at a rate of $22 to $24 an hour.

However, in his Rule 72 statement, Mr. Morales said that he worked for Handyman

Home Improvement, LLC. In addition to his testimony, Mr. Morales provided the

Uninsured Employer’s Fund investigative report. According to the report, the employer’s

name was “Handyman Home Improvement, LLC.” The investigator checked this name in

the NCCI database and discovered it did not have insurance coverage for July 2, 2024. She

then called the listed owner, Angelica Espinoza, who confirmed the company did not have

insurance on the date of injury. Mr. Morales testified that Ms. Espinoza is Mr. Cerda’s

wife and he operated everything under her name.

Finally, Mr. Morales testified that while he did not file a petition with the Bureau

until April 28, 2025, he had reached out to the Bureau for assistance in November 2024.

He said the Bureau sent him paperwork, but he did not fill it out at the time because he had

no one to help him.

Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law

Mr. Morales must prove a likelihood of prevailing at a hearing on the merits that he

is entitled to benefits. Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-239(c)(6) (2024).

The threshold issue is whether Mr. Morales is likely to prove that Mr. Cerda was

his employer. The Appeals Board has held that the petition is the “general equivalent of a

complaint as contemplated in the Tennessee Rules of Civil Procedure.” Vickers v. Amazon,

2019 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 52, at *7 (Aug. 20, 2019). Thus, Mr. Cerda is the

party against whom Mr. Morales requested benefits when he filed his petition.

However, in reviewing the record and considering Mr. Morales’s testimony, it

appears that Mr. Morales’s employer was not Mr. Cerda but Handyman Home

Improvement, LLC. Mr. Morales identified Handyman as his employer in the Rule 72

statement he attached to his petition. In addition, the Uninsured Employers Fund

investigative report also identified Handyman as the employer and the entity without

workers’ compensation insurance. Further Ms. Espinoza, not Mr. Cerda, was listed as the

owner.

Finally, Mr. Morales testified at the hearing that Ms. Espinoza was Mr. Morales’s

wife, and while he ran everything through her name, he ran the business. The Court has

no reason to doubt Mr. Morales’s assertion; however, it does not prove that Mr. Cerda

employed Mr. Morales. A limited liability company exists “separate and apart” from its

2

members, and a member cannot be held individually liable for the obligations of the LLC.

Johnson v. Tanner-Peck, LLC, 2011 Tenn. App. LEXIS 169, at *45 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2011).

Therefore, the Court must deny Mr. Morales’s claim against Mr. Cerda, since he is

not likely to prove that Mr. Cerda was his employer at the time of his accident.

IT IS ORDERED:

1. Mr. Morales’s request for benefits is denied at this time.

2. This case is set for a Scheduling Hearing on December 15, 2025, at 11:00 a.m.

Central Time. The parties must call 615-253-0010. Failure to appear might

result in a determination of the issues without the party’s participation.

3. Mr. Morales is encouraged to contact an Ombudsman at 800-332-2667 to

request a Certificate of Nonrepresentation so he may receive limited legal advice

from an attorney advisor.

ENTERED November 17, 2025.

_____________________________________

ROBERT DURHAM, JUDGE

Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims

Exhibits:

1. Mr. Morales’s Rule 72 Statement

2. Uninsured Employer’s Fund Investigative Report

3. Petition for Benefit Determination

3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the Order was sent as indicated on November 17, 2025.

Name Mail Email Service sent to:

Jairo Noe Morales Villareal, X villarreal199@icloud.com

Employee

Hector Cerda, X X 1402 Hunters Branch Road

Employer Nashville, TN 37013

hectorcerda23@gmail.com

_____________________________________

PENNY SHRUM, Court Clerk

WC.CourtClerk@tn.gov

4

Right to Appeal:

If you disagree with the Court’s Order, you may appeal to the Workers’ Compensation

Appeals Board. To do so, you must:

1. Complete the enclosed form entitled “Notice of Appeal” and file it with the Clerk of the

Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims before the expiration of the deadline.

¾ If the order being appealed is “expedited” (also called “interlocutory”), or if the

order does not dispose of the case in its entirety, the notice of appeal must be filed

within seven (7) business days of the date the order was filed.

¾ If the order being appealed is a “Compensation Order,” or if it resolves all issues

in the case, the notice of appeal must be filed within thirty (30) calendar days of

the date the Compensation Order was filed.

When filing the Notice of Appeal, you must serve a copy on the opposing party (or attorney,

if represented).

2. You must pay, via check, money order, or credit card, a $75.00 filing fee within ten calendar

days after filing the Notice of Appeal. Payments can be made in-person at any Bureau office

or by U.S. mail, hand-delivery, or other delivery service. In the alternative, you may file an

Affidavit of Indigency (form available on the Bureau’s website or any Bureau office)

seeking a waiver of the filing fee. You must file the fully-completed Affidavit of Indigency

within ten calendar days of filing the Notice of Appeal. Failure to timely pay the filing

fee or file the Affidavit of Indigency will result in dismissal of your appeal.

3. You are responsible for ensuring a complete record is presented on appeal. If no court

reporter was present at the hearing, you may request from the Court Clerk the audio

recording of the hearing for a $25.00 fee. If you choose to submit a transcript as part of your

appeal, which the Appeals Board has emphasized is important for a meaningful review of

the case, a licensed court reporter must prepare the transcript, and you must file it with the

Court Clerk. The Court Clerk will prepare the record for submission to the Appeals Board,

and you will receive notice once it has been submitted. For deadlines related to the filing of

transcripts, statements of the evidence, and briefs on appeal, see the applicable rules on the

Bureau’s website at https://www.tn.gov/wcappealsboard. (Click the “Read Rules” button.)

4. After the Workers’ Compensation Judge approves the record and the Court Clerk transmits

it to the Appeals Board, a docketing notice will be sent to the parties.

If neither party timely files an appeal with the Appeals Board, the Court Order

becomes enforceable. See Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-239(d)(3) (expedited/interlocutory

orders) and Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-239(c)(7) (compensation orders).

For self-represented litigants: Help from an Ombudsman is available at 800-332-2667.

NOTICE OF APPEAL

Tennessee Bureau of Workers’ Compensation

www.tn.gov/workforce/injuries-at-work/

wc.courtclerk@tn.gov | 1-800-332-2667

Docket No.: ________________________

State File No.: ______________________

Date of Injury: _____________________

___________________________________________________________________________

Employee

v.

___________________________________________________________________________

Employer

Notice is given that ____________________________________________________________________

[List name(s) of all appealing party(ies). Use separate sheet if necessary.]

appeals the following order(s) of the Tennessee Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims to the

Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board;ĐŚĞĐŬŽŶĞŽƌŵŽƌĞĂƉƉůŝĐĂďůĞďŽdžĞƐĂŶĚŝŶĐůƵĚĞƚŚĞĚĂƚĞĨŝůĞͲ

ƐƚĂŵƉĞĚŽŶƚŚĞĨŝƌƐƚƉĂŐĞŽĨƚŚĞŽƌĚĞƌ;ƐͿďĞŝŶŐĂƉƉĞĂůĞĚͿ͗

ප Expedited Hearing Order filed on _______________ ප Motion Order filed on ___________________

ප Compensation Order filed on__________________ ප Other Order filed on_____________________

issued by Judge _________________________________________________________________________.

Statement of the Issues on Appeal

Provide a short and plain statement of the issues on appeal or basis for relief on appeal:

________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________

Parties

Appellant(s) (Requesting Party): _________________________________________ ‫܆‬Employer ‫܆‬Employee

Address: ________________________________________________________ Phone: ___________________

Email: __________________________________________________________

Attorney’s Name: ______________________________________________ BPR#: _______________________

Attorney’s Email: ______________________________________________ Phone: _______________________

Attorney’s Address: _________________________________________________________________________

* Attach an additional sheet for each additional Appellant *

LB-1099 rev. 01/20 Page 1 of 2 RDA 11082

Employee Name: _______________________________________ Docket No.: _____________________ Date of Inj.: _______________

Appellee(s) (Opposing Party): ___________________________________________ ‫܆‬Employer ‫܆‬Employee

Appellee’s Address: ______________________________________________ Phone: ____________________

Email: _________________________________________________________

Attorney’s Name: _____________________________________________ BPR#: ________________________

Attorney’s Email: _____________________________________________ Phone: _______________________

Attorney’s Address: _________________________________________________________________________

* Attach an additional sheet for each additional Appellee *

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, _____________________________________________________________, certify that I have forwarded a

true and exact copy of this Notice of Appeal by First Class mail, postage prepaid, or in any manner as described

in Tennessee Compilation Rules & Regulations, Chapter 0800-02-21, to all parties and/or their attorneys in this

case on this the __________ day of ___________________________________, 20 ____.

______________________________________________

[Signature of appellant or attorney for appellant]

LB-1099 rev. 01/20 Page 2 of 2 RDA 11082

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.