Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersSS

10,000+ results

0.43s

  • Opinion No. 70-258 (1970) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 21, 1970

    (Emphasis added) In the case of Carter Oil Company v. … Lincoln National Life Insurance Company v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Mueller, Linda v. CSL Plasma

    2025 TN WC App. 32 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Aug 15, 2025

    See Rye v. Women’s Care Ctr. of Memphis, MPLLC, 477 S.W.3d 235, 250 (Tenn. 2015). … See Long v. Hamilton-Ryker, No. 2015-07-0023, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 23, at *15 (Tenn. Workers’ Comp. App. Bd.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • McGauvran, James v. ATOS Syntel, Inc.

    2021 TN WC 225 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Sep 10, 2021

    ATOS appealed, and the Appeals Board vacated and remanded. … The Appeals Board has held that “a decision to award attorneys’ fees and expenses at an interlocutory stage of a case should be made only in extremely limited circumstances.” Travis v. Carter Express, 2019 TN Wrk. Comp.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 76-217 (1976) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 25, 1976

    In Allen v. … Co. v. Board of County Commissioners of Stephens County, Okl., 389 P.2d 476 , 477 (1964), and Jack v. State, 183 Okl. 375 , 82 P.2d 1033 (1937).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • RECINOS, KENNEDY v. ELEAZAR MARTINEZ d/b/a EXCELLENCE FRAMING, LLC

    2024 TN WC 77 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Nov 1, 2024

    Code Ann. § 50-6-239(c)(6) (2024); McCord v. Advantage Human Resourcing, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 6, at *7-8, 9 (Mar. 27, 2015). … See Ducros v. Metro Roofing and Metal Supply Co., Inc., 2017 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • VILLAREAL, JAIRO NOE MORALES

    2025 TN WC 79 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Nov 17, 2025

    The Appeals Board has held that the petition is the “general equivalent of a complaint as contemplated in the Tennessee Rules of Civil Procedure.” Vickers v. Amazon, 2019 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. … The Court Clerk will prepare the record for submission to the Appeals Board, and you will receive notice once it has been submitted.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 80-042 (1980) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 6, 1980

    Roberts v. Ledgerwood, 134 Okl. 152 , 272 P. 448 (1929). Elias v. … In Tulsa Exposition Fair Corp. v. Board of Co.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1988)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 20, 1988

    Taber v. Carter Oil Co., 57 P.2d 248 (Okla. 1936); Fearnside v. Graham, 1 P.2d 763 (Okla. 1931). … Midwest City v. Harris, 561 P.2d 1357 (Okla. 1977). The intended effect of 68 O.S. 2467 was to provide an adequate remedy to the taxpayer without disrupting the local budget process.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Jones, Grey & Bayley, P.S. v. Department of Revenue

    16 Or. Tax 300 · Oregon Tax Court · Dec 12, 2000

    See, e.g., Brown and McAlpin v. Dept. of Rev., 3 OTR 481 (1969). … See Brown, 3 OTR 481 .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • HOLLAND, JUDITH v. RANDSTAD

    2025 TN WC 89 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Dec 10, 2025

    Orman v. Williams Sonoma, Inc., 803 S.W.2d 672, 676 (Tenn. 1991). As shown below, all the factors favor Dr. Schroerlucke. Dr. … Schroerlucke’s specific board certification as a spine surgeon favors him on the factor of qualifications. Drs. Lochemes and Lager are board-certified orthopedic surgeons but without a certification in spine surgery.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Flint v. Lawrence Township

    6 N.J. Tax 97 · New Jersey Tax Court · Oct 25, 1983

    See State v. Rembert, 156 N.J.Super. 203, 206 , 383 A.2d 747 (App.Div.1978). This court was recently faced with a similar predicament in Seatrain Lines v. … Two cases which might appear similar are Robinson v.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 68-304 (1968) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Oct 17, 1968

    Hedges v. Groom, 194 Okl. 384 , 151 P.2d 936 (1944). Where the language is clear and unambiguous a statute must be held to mean what it plainly expresses and no room is left for construction. Rierks v. … Smith v. Nebraska Liquor Control Commission, 152 Neb. 676 , 42 N.W.2d 297 .

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Question Submitted by: The Honorable Mike Osburn, Oklahoma House of Representatives, District 81

    2026 OK AG 9 · Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 16, 2026

    See 70 O.S.Supp.2024, § 14-108 Marley v. Cannon , 1980 OK 147 618 P.2d 401 ¶7 By statute, the Legislature largely delegated to the Board the power to determine what courses and services are offered at CareerTechs. … McClure v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Byrd v. Penn Ventilation

    North Carolina Industrial Commission · Apr 2, 2008

    Adam Brown saw plaintiff for an independent medical evaluation. Dr. … In Reinninger v. Prestige Fabricators , Inc. , 136 N.C.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 68-133 (1968) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 29, 1968

    In Cook et al. v. Cordell, 160 Okl. 59 , 15 P.2d 565 , the court stated: ". . . … Shaw v. Grumbine, 137 Okl. 95 , 297 P. 315 ; Hines v. Winters, Okl. 320 P.2d 1114 . In Trapp, State Auditor v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1993)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 18, 1993

    Federal credit unions are governed by the National Credit Union Administration Board (the "Federal Board); in Oklahoma state credit unions are governed by the Oklahoma Credit Union Board (the State Board). 12 U.S.C.A. 1766 … Oral Roberts University v. Oklahoma Tax Commission, 714 P.2d 1013 (Okla. 1985). see also, United Airlines Inc. v. State Board of Equalization, 789 P.2d 1305 (Okla. 1990); McCain v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 72-206 (1972) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 3, 1972

    See also Sachem's Head Property Owners' Association v. Town of Guilford, 112 Conn. 515 , 517 , 152 A. 877 ; State ex rel Malkin v. … For colleges, control is in the state; for high schools and grade schools, control is local, and rests in the local board, subject to the will of the people." Muse v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Reazkallah,, Maikel v. ABM Industries, Inc.

    2018 TN WC 184 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Nov 19, 2018

    To appeal to the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board, you must: 1. … The appealing party has fifteen calendar days after the date of that notice to submit a brief to the Appeals Board. See the Practices and Procedures of the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 69-317 (1970) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jan 15, 1970

    STATE PERSONNEL BOARD — WITNESS FEES AND MILEAGE NOT PAID Oklahoma State Personnel Board. … Bd. of Educ. of Oklahoma City v. State Bd. of Educ., 197 Okl. 141 , 169 P.2d 795 (1946).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 70-153 (1970) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 23, 1970

    In Sutto v. Board of Medical Registration and Examination, 242 Ind. … and material requirements, i.e., four thousand 60-minute hours resident attendance in class " In Pennsylvania Board of Undertakers v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.