Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.16s
ROMERO, MAURICIO v. JOACHIN MAGDIEL
2025 TN WC 93 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Dec 22, 2025
Code Ann. § 50-6-239(d)(1) (2024); McCord v. Advantage Human Resourcing, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 6, at *7-8, 9 (Mar. 27, 2015). To determine whether Mr. … Smiley v. Four Seasons Coach Leasing, Inc., 2016 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 28, at *10-11 (July 15, 2016). However, the Appeals Board emphasized the importance of the right to control the conduct of the work.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 16, 1993
THE STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION); AND 70 O.S. 14 -103(1) (THE STATE BOARD OF VOCATIONAL AND TECHNICAL EDUCATION). … FULLER V. ODOM, 741 P.2D 449 (OKLA.1987).
Cited 0 timesPublished58 How. Pr. 107 · New York Surrogate's Court · Sep 15, 1879
McGillis, 9 Barb., 35; Brown agt. Brown, 16 Barb., 572 ; Vandermark agt. Vandermark, 26 Barb., 418 ; Adams agt. Wynne, 7 Paige, 97 ; McNaughton agt. McNaughton, 34 N. … of argument against such interpretation, inasmuch as under sections 43 and 44 Revised Statutes above referred to, the subsequent marriage of a testator, followed by birth of children, or a subsequent marriage alone of an v/
Cited 5 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jan 10, 2000
Macy v. Freeman, 814 P.2d 147 , 153 (Okla. 1991). Thus, the statute itself dictates that the sheriff serve not merely on the board, but as its chair. … Morrison v. Ardmore Industrial Development Corp., Okl., 444 P.2d 816 (1963). Morrison, supra, cited an earlier decision of this Court (Woodward v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedFreeman, Wayne v. UNITED ROAD SERVICES, INC.
2025 TN WC 67 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Oct 17, 2025
Freeman gave United timely notice of his accidental right- rotator-cuff injury, the Appeals Board in Ernstes v. Printpack, Inc., 2023 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. … The Court Clerk will prepare the record for submission to the Appeals Board, and you will receive notice once it has been submitted.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 24, 1988
No. 53 v. Independent SD. No. I-128, 474 P.2d 643 , 644 (Okla. 1970) (emphasis added). … In Clinkenbeard v. Frazier, 582 P.2d 413 (Okla.Ct.App. 1978), the Court of Appeals considered the process required to properly effect a school annexation.
Cited 0 timesPublishedLowe's Home Centers, Inc. v. Monroe County Assessor
Indiana Tax Court · Nov 19, 2020
Assessor v. Porter-Starke Servs., Inc., 88 N.E.3d 814, 820 (Ind. … Assessor v. Housing P’ships, Inc., 151 N.E.3d 821, 826-27 (Ind.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 11, 1973
The role of the State Board of Education is revealed by the following language: "After review of the matter the State Board of Education shall issue its decision either confirming the action of the local board of education … See Consolidated Motor Freight Terminal, et al. v. Vineyard, et al., 143 P.2d 610 .
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 4, 1994
BY THE BOARD AND MAY NOT MEET THE SAME STANDARDS AS SCHOOLS REGULATED BY THE BOARD ARE REQUIRED TO MEET TO BE LICENSED. … WHAT CONSTITUTES A SCHOOL IS NOT EXPLAINED BY THE CODE, BUT WORDS FOUND IN STATUTES ARE TO BE UNDERSTOOD IN THEIR ORDINARY SENSE EXCEPT WHEN A CONTRARY INTENTION PLAINLY APPEARS. 25 O.S. 1 (1991); HESS V.
Cited 0 timesPublishedGlancy v. Department of Revenue
12 Or. Tax 117 · Oregon Tax Court · Dec 23, 1991
Appeals of valuation issues begin with the board of equalization. ORS 309.100. … Rothenfluch v. Dept. of Rev., 11 OTR 322 (1990), vac’d on other grounds, 312 Or 1 , 815 P2d 698 (1991).
Cited 1 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 1, 1972
An early Oklahoma case, The Guthrie Daily Leader v. … Further, in Mid-Continent Building Co. v.
Cited 0 timesPublished76 Misc. 2d 132 · New York Surrogate's Court · Dec 11, 1973
Since the executrix was not served until November 28,1960 the court held that the action was barred (see Brown v. Ingersoll, 226 N. Y. S. 2d 479). No appeal was taken from that decision. … The court, in Brown v. Ingersoll (226 N. Y. S. 2d 479, supra), held in 1962 that petitioner’s claim was barred by the six-year Statute of Limitations applicable to an action upon a contract (Civ. Prac. Act, § 48).
Cited 3 timesPublishedBeene, Marshall v. Metro Services, Inc.
2017 TN WC App. 1 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Jan 12, 2017
TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD Marshall Beene ) Docket No. 2016-01-0264 ) v. … Marshall Beene ) Docket No. 2016-01-0264 ) v. ) State File No
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 12, 1972
In re Redwine Estate, Okl., 445 P.2d 275 , and McVicker v. Board of County Commissioners of Caddo County, Okl., 442 P.2d 297 , and, In re Guardianship of Campbell, Okl., 450 P.2d 203 . … The Court continued at page 33: "In Shelton v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Oct 8, 1980
(Emphasis added) In Carl v. Board of Regents, Okl., 577 P.2d 912 (1977), and Sanders v. … In Bell v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedGao v. Sinova Specialties, Inc.
2016 NCBC 103 · North Carolina Business Court · Dec 21, 2016
Gao v. Sinova Specialties, Inc., 2016 NCBC 103. … V. RULE 12(b)(6) MOTIONS 44.
Cited 1 timesPublishedJackson, Willie A. v. Koch Foods of Chattanooga
2019 TN WC 154 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Oct 25, 2019
.: 2017-01-0541 Employee, ) V. ) Koch Foods of Chattanooga, ) State File No.: 90515-2016 Employer, ) And ) Arch Ins. Co., ) Judge: Audrey A. … Willis v. All Staff; 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 42, at *18 (Nov. 9, 2015).
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Dec 17, 1985
See White v. Wint , 638 P.2d 1109 , 1114 (Okla. 1981) (a general term is not ordinarily to be given a broader meaning than that manifested in the specific terms preceding it). … From the specific inclusion of elected officials we may infer the Legislature's intent to exclude appointive board members. See St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co. v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 17, 1971
BOARD OF LEGISLATIVE COMPENSATION WITHOUT AUTHORITY TO REGULATE EXPENSES PAID MEMBERS OF LEGISLATURE The Board of Legislative Compensation does not have authority under Article V , Section 21 , Oklahoma Constitution, to fix … The Board on Legislative Compensation is created in Article V , Section 21 , Oklahoma Constitution. The Board is empowered to review and change the compensation of the members of the Legislature.
Cited 0 timesPublished3 Mills Surr. 190 · New York Surrogate's Court · Jul 15, 1902
It seems, however, that this case, with Conkling v. Brown, 57 Barb. 269 , and Wheeler v. Clutterbuck, 52 N. Y. 67 , holds otherwise and supports McCarthy v. Marsh, supra. … —For diagrams of genealogical tree in this case and in Valentine v. Wetherill, Conkling v. Brown and Wheeler v. Clutterbuck, see 38 Misc. 413 .—Ed.
Cited 2 timesPublished
Ask Donna