Case law

New York Bay Railroad v. Kelly

22 N.J. Misc. 204 · New Jersey Tax Court · Apr 25, 1944

Camden County Realty Co. v. State Board , 131 N. J. L. 132, 134; 35 Atl. Rep. (2d) 221; Hackensack Water Co. v. State Board of Tax Appeals, 129 N. J. L. 535; 30 Atl. Rep. (2d) 400; Koch v. Jersey City, 118 N. J. … Rep. 275 ; Gannon v. State Board of Tax Appeals, 123 N. J. L. 450, 454; 9 Atl. Rep. (2d) 531; Cedar Grove v. State Board of Taxes and Assessment, 12 N. J. Mis. R. 367; 171 Atl. Rep. 546 ; Skouras Theatres Corp. v.

Opinion No. (1986)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jan 14, 1986

City v. Century Indemnity Co ., supra, a member of a county equalization/excise board holds public office. … Guthrie Daily Leader v. Cameron , 41 P. 635 (1895). Furthermore, in State ex rel. Cartwright v. Okla.

Palumbo v. Donalds

194 Misc. 2d 675 · Civil Court of the City of New York · Jan 23, 2003

Assoc. v A.T. Kearney, Inc., 127 Misc 2d at 38-39 , supra; see also Cohen v Brown, Harris Stevens, 132 Misc 2d at 87 , supra.) … Corp. v McRae, 665 F Supp at 235 , supra; see also *684 Cohen v Brown, Harris Stevens, 132 Misc 2d at 87 , supra.)

Opinion No. (1988)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 26, 1988

City of Hartshorne v. Marathon Oil Co., 693 P.2d 97 (Okla. 1979); Shipp v. Southeastern Oklahoma Industries Authority, 498 P.2d 1395 (Okla. 1972). … City of Duncan v. Bingham, 394 P.2d 456 (Okla. 1964).

Opinion No. 76-334 (1976) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 15, 1976

Further, as to the definition of the term "executive session", Attorney General's Opinion 68-247 adopted the definition set forth in Blum v. Board of Zoning, 149 N.Y.S.2d 5 , and Thomas v. … Of course, at the close of the evidentiary hearing, a board may deliberate in closed session, in the same manner as a jury does in a court case, to arrive at its decision. See Stillwater Savings and Loan Association v.

Griffin v. Palatine Ins. Co.

235 S.W. 202 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Nov 30, 1921

Rep. 755 , Olive v. Van Patten, 7 Tex. Civ. App. 630 , 25 S. W. 428 , and Brown v. Mortgage Co., 97 Tex. 599 , 80 S. W. 985 , 67 L. R. A. 195, and principally upon the first two of these decisions. … Winfree and Olive v. Van Patten.

Hill v. Tyson Foods

North Carolina Industrial Commission · Jun 5, 1997

Brown. Ms. Brown knew that plaintiff had first begun experiencing back pain while working on the flour pack line. Ms. … Russell v. Lowes Product Distribution , 108 N.C. App. 762 (1993). 4.

Berge Ford, Inc. v. Maricopa County

172 Ariz. 483 · Arizona Tax Court · Sep 11, 1992

In 1976, in Dep’t of Property Valuation v. … Later in 1976, the Arizona Supreme Court, in Dep’t of Property Valuation v.

Beach, Rhonda v. Hilltoppers, Inc.

2024 TN WC 91 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Dec 18, 2024

Smith v. Memphis Nat’l Parts Warehouse/Daimler Trucks, 2021 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 36, at *12 (Oct. 19, 2021). Despite his referral, the Court finds that Dr. … The Court Clerk will prepare the record for submission to the Appeals Board, and you will receive notice once it has been submitted.

315-321 Eastern Parkway Development Fund Corp. v. Wint-Howell

9 Misc. 3d 644 · Civil Court of the City of New York · Aug 15, 2005

Conclusion of Law The seminal case regarding the authority and autonomy of a cooperative’s board of directors to make decisions for the benefit of the cooperative is Matter of Levandusky v One Fifth Ave. Apt. … In its moving papers, the petitioner cites the case of 29-45 Tenants Corp. v Rowe (NYLJ, Jan. 8, 1992, at 23, col 4), which is analogous to the instant proceeding.

Opinion No. (1992)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 18, 1992

City of Tulsa v. … Pursuant to Board of Regents of the Univ. of Oklahoma v.

Opinion No. (1986)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 18, 1986

Trapp v. Cook Const. Co ., 24 Okla. 850 , 105 P. 667 (1909)." Board of Regents of Univ. of Okla. v. Baker , 638 P.2d 464 , 466 (Okla. 1981). … Wiseman v. Boren , 545 P.2d 753 , 761 (Okla. 1976).

Monarch Steel Co. v. State of Indiana Tax Commissioners

527 N.E.2d 1171 · Indiana Tax Court · Sep 8, 1988

Stokely-Van Camp, Inc. v. State Bd. of Tax Comm'rs (1979), 182 Ind.App. 91 , 394 N.E.2d 209 . … Although the State Board determination regarding IC 6-1.1-10-80 was clear, the availability of exemption under IC 6-1.1-10-29 was not specifically addressed in the Board's final determination.

Kleeburg, Monica v. Profit Line Services, Russell Floersheim/United Resource Group, Environmental Solutions Systems, Embassy Suites/Certistaff

2017 TN WC 93 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · May 22, 2017

In considering the above factors, the Appeals Board held in Thompsen v. Concrete Solutions, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. … In deciding this issue, the Court notes the following discussion of the Appeals Board in Willis v. All Staff, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd.

Redmon, Wetonia v. Dr. Daniel Jefferson Barnes

2023 TN WC 55 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Aug 7, 2023

The Appeals Board determined the hazard was sufficient to make the injury non-idiopathic. Id. … In McCaffery, the Appeals Board confirmed that an injury may “arise out of” employment if an employment hazard either caused the accident or aggravated the injury. The Appeals Board held it was the fact that Mr.

Opinion No. 69-193 (1969) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 6, 1969

Boards of Education — Travel Expenses A board of education may legally pay the expenses of one or more of its members to attend the National School Administrators Convention and the National School Boards Association Convention … The board must still determine within its own discretion what travel is necessary, suitable, and proper for the needs of the particular school district. In the case of Kay County, Excise Board v. Atchison, T. S.F.R.

Opinion No. 76-239 (1976) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 23, 1976

SUPREME COURT DECISION — POWER OF BOARD TO PROHIBIT MISLEADING ADS Pursuant to the decisions of the United States Supreme Court (Virginia State Board of Pharmacy et al., v. … What effect does the United States Supreme Court decision, Virginia State Board of Pharmacy, et al. v.

Opinion No. (1991) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 2, 1991

SETTLES V. BOARD OF EDUCATION. MCCURTAIN COUNTY. OKLAHOMA, 389 P.2D 356 (1964), AND HAS BEEN REAFFIRMED IN SUBSEQUENT OPINIONS OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL. … NONPROFIT ORGANIZATION AND THE STATE THAT WOULD VIOLATE ARTICLE V, SECTION 23.

Opinion No. 80-190 (1980) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Oct 16, 1980

'Board' means The Board of Governors of Licensed Architects of Oklahoma." … Boards created by statute may only exercise the power granted by statute. Boydston v. State, Okl., 277 P.2d 138 (1954).

Opinion No. 72-128 (1972) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 24, 1972

** Summary ** CALLING SPECIAL SCHOOL BOARD ELECTION A local board of education of a school district is not authorized to call a special election for purposes of filling a vacancy on said board; a county election board is … matter prevails over a general statute which does not refer to particular subject matter but does contain language which might be broad enough to cover the subject matter if a special statute was not in existence, Reubin v.