Opinion

Beach, Rhonda v. Hilltoppers, Inc.

  • 2024 TN WC 91
Court
Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims
Filed
Dec 18, 2024
Status
Published
On the bench
Durham
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

FILED

Dec 18, 2024

09:12 AM(CT)

TENNESSEE COURT OF

WORKERS' COMPENSATION

CLAIMS

TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION

IN THE COURT OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION CLAIMS

AT COOKEVILLE

RHONDA BEACH, ) Docket No.: 2022-04-0022

Employee, )

v. ) State File No.: 24775-2021

HILLTOPPERS, INC., )

Employer, ) Judge Robert Durham

And )

ACCIDENT FUND INS. CO., )

Insurer. )

EXPEDITED HEARING ORDER DENYING BENEFITS

(DECISION ON THE RECORD)

The Court considered Ms. Beach’s request for an Expedited Hearing based on the

record on December 12, 2024. Ms. Beach requested an order that Hilltoppers authorize a

second medical opinion based on the recommendation of her authorized physician. The

Court holds that under these facts, the law does not require Hilltoppers to pay for a second

opinion and denies Ms. Beach’s request.

History of Claim

Ms. Beach suffered a left-biceps tear at work on March 3, 2021, resulting in a

“popeye” deformity. An MRI also revealed significant shoulder arthritis.

Ms. Beach received authorized care from Dr. Matthew Rappe. He diagnosed a

work-related biceps rupture but said it was “in the setting” of “non-work-related

degenerative arthritis.” He treated her with physical therapy. Ms. Beach claimed moderate

relief from her shoulder pain but began complaining of numbness and tingling down her

left arm.

Dr. Rappe ordered an EMG test, which revealed moderate left-median neuropathy.

He considered it work-related and referred Ms. Beach to hand specialist Dr. Douglas

Calhoun. Ms. Beach told Dr. Calhoun that she did not have numbness and tingling before

1

her shoulder injury, and he attributed her symptoms to her work injury. He treated Ms.

Beach with an injection, but her symptoms did not improve.

In October 2021, Dr. Rappe released Ms. Beach at maximum medical improvement

and assigned a 2% impairment due to the biceps rupture.

Dr. Rappe did not see Ms. Beach again until October 2022. She still complained of

left-arm pain along her biceps tendon, and Dr. Rappe noted significant left-shoulder

crepitus. X-rays revealed end-stage degenerative arthritis in her left shoulder, although

Ms. Beach denied significant shoulder pain. She requested that he fix her biceps tear,

which she believed would alleviate her pain.

Dr. Rappe diagnosed rotator cuff arthropathy with end-stage joint disease “in the

setting of work-related biceps injury.” He informed Ms. Beach that her osteoarthritis and

arthropathy were not work-related and repairing the biceps tendon would not relieve her

pain. But he agreed to request a second opinion because it “might provide Ms. Beach some

comfort.”

Hilltoppers denied the request, and Dr. Rappe did not see Ms. Beach again until

May 2024. Ms. Beach “emphatically” complained of shoulder pain, which she said did not

start until her work injury. Dr. Rappe said that he understood, but “he just cannot make

osteoarthritis about her shoulder a work-related injury.” Ms. Beach remained dissatisfied

and insisted on a second opinion. Dr. Rappe said he would give her a prescription saying

that she had a history of a biceps tendon tear that was work-related, but she also suffered

from end-stage osteoarthritis that was non-work related. He recommended that she proceed

with an arthroplasty.

The prescription Dr. Rappe wrote after this visit reads “biceps rupture, end stage

arthritis. Second opinion for work related injury.”

Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law

To obtain her requested treatment, Ms. Beach does not have to prove at this stage

“every essential element” of her claim by a preponderance of the evidence. Instead, she

must show a likelihood of prevailing at a hearing on the merits. Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-

239(d)(1) (2024).

Here, both parties agreed that the relevant statute is section 50-6-204(a)(3)(H),

which states “[a]ny treatment recommended by a physician or chiropractor selected

pursuant to this subdivision (a)(3), or by referral, if applicable, shall be presumed to be

medically necessary for treatment of the injured employee.” The parties also agreed that

Dr. Rappe is Ms. Beach’s authorized physician and he made a referral for a “second

opinion.”

2

Thus, under section 50-6-204(a)(3)(H), Dr. Rappe’s referral is presumed medically

necessary for treatment of Ms. Beach’s work-related injury. To prevail, Hilltoppers must

rebut this presumption by a preponderance of the evidence. Smith v. Memphis Nat’l Parts

Warehouse/Daimler Trucks, 2021 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 36, at *12 (Oct. 19,

2021).

Despite his referral, the Court finds that Dr. Rappe’s opinions in his medical records

rebut the presumption.

Reading Dr. Rappe’s records as a whole, he believes Ms. Beach’s symptoms are

caused by her end-stage osteoarthritis, not her biceps tendon tear. He repeatedly wrote that

biceps tendon surgery would not alleviate her symptoms. Further, he made it clear that Ms.

Beach’s osteoarthritis, which he considered the source of her pain, is not work-related.

Finally, he expressly said that he was referring Ms. Beach based solely on her

dissatisfaction with his opinions and “because it might give her some comfort.”

The Court finds that Dr. Rappe did not order a second opinion because it was

medically necessary to treat Ms. Beach’s work-related injury but to simply placate her.

Thus, Ms. Beach is not likely to prevail at a hearing on the merits.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED:

1. Ms. Beach’s request for a second opinion is denied.

2. This case is set for a Scheduling Hearing on February 3, 2025, at 9:30 a.m.

Central Time. The parties must call 615-253-0010. Failure to appear might

result in a determination of the issues without the party’s participation.

ENTERED December 18, 2024.

_____________________________________

ROBERT DURHAM, JUDGE

Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims

3

APPENDIX

Exhibits:

1. Ms. Beach’s Rule 72 Statement

2. Dr. Rappe’s medical records

3. Dr. Calhoun’s medical record

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the Order was sent as indicated on December 18, 2024.

Name Certified Email Service sent to:

Mail

Adam Brock-Dagnan, X adam.brockdagnan@forthepeople.com

employee’s attorney

Cole Stinson, X Cole.stinson@accidentfund.com

employer’s attorney

_____________________________________

PENNY SHRUM, Court Clerk

WC.CourtClerk@tn.gov

4

Right to Appeal:

If you disagree with the Court’s Order, you may appeal to the Workers’ Compensation

Appeals Board. To do so, you must:

1. Complete the enclosed form entitled “Notice of Appeal” and file it with the Clerk of the

Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims before the expiration of the deadline.

¾ If the order being appealed is “expedited” (also called “interlocutory”), or if the

order does not dispose of the case in its entirety, the notice of appeal must be filed

within seven (7) business days of the date the order was filed.

¾ If the order being appealed is a “Compensation Order,” or if it resolves all issues

in the case, the notice of appeal must be filed within thirty (30) calendar days of

the date the Compensation Order was filed.

When filing the Notice of Appeal, you must serve a copy on the opposing party (or attorney,

if represented).

2. You must pay, via check, money order, or credit card, a $75.00 filing fee within ten calendar

days after filing the Notice of Appeal. Payments can be made in-person at any Bureau office

or by U.S. mail, hand-delivery, or other delivery service. In the alternative, you may file an

Affidavit of Indigency (form available on the Bureau’s website or any Bureau office)

seeking a waiver of the filing fee. You must file the fully-completed Affidavit of Indigency

within ten calendar days of filing the Notice of Appeal. Failure to timely pay the filing

fee or file the Affidavit of Indigency will result in dismissal of your appeal.

3. You are responsible for ensuring a complete record is presented on appeal. If no court

reporter was present at the hearing, you may request from the Court Clerk the audio

recording of the hearing for a $25.00 fee. If you choose to submit a transcript as part of your

appeal, which the Appeals Board has emphasized is important for a meaningful review of

the case, a licensed court reporter must prepare the transcript, and you must file it with the

Court Clerk. The Court Clerk will prepare the record for submission to the Appeals Board,

and you will receive notice once it has been submitted. For deadlines related to the filing of

transcripts, statements of the evidence, and briefs on appeal, see the applicable rules on the

Bureau’s website at https://www.tn.gov/wcappealsboard. (Click the “Read Rules” button.)

4. After the Workers’ Compensation Judge approves the record and the Court Clerk transmits

it to the Appeals Board, a docketing notice will be sent to the parties.

If neither party timely files an appeal with the Appeals Board, the Court Order

becomes enforceable. See Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-239(d)(3) (expedited/interlocutory

orders) and Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-239(c)(7) (compensation orders).

For self-represented litigants: Help from an Ombudsman is available at 800-332-2667.

NOTICE OF APPEAL

Tennessee Bureau of Workers’ Compensation

www.tn.gov/workforce/injuries-at-work/

wc.courtclerk@tn.gov | 1-800-332-2667

Docket No.: ________________________

State File No.: ______________________

Date of Injury: _____________________

___________________________________________________________________________

Employee

v.

___________________________________________________________________________

Employer

Notice is given that ____________________________________________________________________

[List name(s) of all appealing party(ies). Use separate sheet if necessary.]

appeals the following order(s) of the Tennessee Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims to the

Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board;ĐŚĞĐŬŽŶĞŽƌŵŽƌĞĂƉƉůŝĐĂďůĞďŽdžĞƐĂŶĚŝŶĐůƵĚĞƚŚĞĚĂƚĞĨŝůĞͲ

ƐƚĂŵƉĞĚŽŶƚŚĞĨŝƌƐƚƉĂŐĞŽĨƚŚĞŽƌĚĞƌ;ƐͿďĞŝŶŐĂƉƉĞĂůĞĚͿ͗

□ Expedited Hearing Order filed on _______________ □ Motion Order filed on ___________________

□ Compensation Order filed on__________________ □ Other Order filed on_____________________

issued by Judge _________________________________________________________________________.

Statement of the Issues on Appeal

Provide a short and plain statement of the issues on appeal or basis for relief on appeal:

________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________

Parties

Appellant(s) (Requesting Party): _________________________________________ ‫܆‬Employer ‫܆‬Employee

Address: ________________________________________________________ Phone: ___________________

Email: __________________________________________________________

Attorney’s Name: ______________________________________________ BPR#: _______________________

Attorney’s Email: ______________________________________________ Phone: _______________________

Attorney’s Address: _________________________________________________________________________

* Attach an additional sheet for each additional Appellant *

LB-1099 rev. 01/20 Page 1 of 2 RDA 11082

Employee Name: _______________________________________ Docket No.: _____________________ Date of Inj.: _______________

Appellee(s) (Opposing Party): ___________________________________________ ‫܆‬Employer ‫܆‬Employee

Appellee’s Address: ______________________________________________ Phone: ____________________

Email: _________________________________________________________

Attorney’s Name: _____________________________________________ BPR#: ________________________

Attorney’s Email: _____________________________________________ Phone: _______________________

Attorney’s Address: _________________________________________________________________________

* Attach an additional sheet for each additional Appellee *

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, _____________________________________________________________, certify that I have forwarded a

true and exact copy of this Notice of Appeal by First Class mail, postage prepaid, or in any manner as described

in Tennessee Compilation Rules & Regulations, Chapter 0800-02-21, to all parties and/or their attorneys in this

case on this the __________ day of ___________________________________, 20 ____.

______________________________________________

[Signature of appellant or attorney for appellant]

LB-1099 rev. 01/20 Page 2 of 2 RDA 11082

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.