Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
0.46s
Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Oct 5, 1979
United States v. Mississippi Valley Generating Co., 364 U.S. 520 , 81 S.Ct. 294 (1961), 5 L.Ed. 268 ; Youngblood v. Consolidated School District No. 3, Payne County, 104 Okla. 235 , 230 P. 910 (1924); Stigall v. … by a board member's employer where the board member has a direct or indirect interest in the contract.
Cited 0 timesPublished932 A.2d 1037 · Court of Judicial Discipline of Pennsylvania · Jul 27, 2007
by the Judicial Conduct Board, and the Judicial Conduct Board shall file a written report monthly with this Court advising that, to its knowledge the Respondent has, or has not, been in compliance -with the Rules Govermng … Standards of Conduct of Magisterial District Judges and the provisions of Article V of the Pennsylvania Constitution pertaining to the conduct of Magisterial District Judges; 4.in the event Respondent fails to comply with
Cited 2 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 10, 1997
Citicorp Savings and Trust Company v. Banking Board, 704 P.2d 490 , 494 (Okla. 1985). … Kirk v.
Cited 0 timesPublished967 A.2d 460 · Court of Judicial Discipline of Pennsylvania · Jan 5, 2009
This action is taken pursuant to the authority of the Board under Article V, § 18 of the Constitution of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, which grants the Board the authority to determine whether there is probable cause … The “Stay A way Order” was captioned Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedKING, SPENCER v. RENTOKIL NORTH AMERICA, INCORPORATED
2025 TN WC 14 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Mar 12, 2025
THE COURT OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION CLAIMS AT GRAY SPENCER KING, ) Docket No. 2024-20-8017 Employee, ) v. … The Court Clerk will prepare the record for submission to the Appeals Board, and you will receive notice once it has been submitted.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jan 30, 1976
Becknell v. State Industrial Court, 512 P.2d 1180 (1973). … Thomas v. State, Okl. Cr., 404 P.2d 71 (1965).
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 4, 1976
POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD — AUTHORITY TO ACT ON ITS OWN INITIATIVE A request in writing from a member agency of the Pollution Control Coordinating Board requesting the Board to act on its own initiative is sufficient to invoke … Board of County Commissioners of Nowata County v. Price, Okl., 385 P.2d 479 (1963); Means v. Vernon, 108 Okl. 123 , 235 P. 163 (1925).
Cited 0 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 29, 1976
See Mann v. Nyquist, 71 N.Y. Misc.2d 435, 336 N.Y.2d 270 (1972), and Sinapkin v. Nyquist, 68 N.Y. Misc.2d 214, 325 N.Y. Supp. 823 (1971). … See, State v. Board of Education of City of Duluth, 213 Minn. 550 , 7 N.W.2d 544 (1943). However, the principal purpose of the tenure statutes is to secure permanency in the teaching force.
Cited 0 timesPublished2024 TN WC 90 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Dec 17, 2024
The Appeals Board vacated the order and instructed the Court to consider both sections (1) and (2) of Rule 41.02. Howard v. Centurion, 2024 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 39, at *7 (Nov. 7, 2024). … Burchfield v. Renfree, 2013 Tenn. App. LEXIS 685, at *86-87 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2013). Here, considering 41.02(1), Dr.
Cited 0 timesPublishedClapa v. Multnomah County Assessor
Oregon Tax Court · May 21, 2012
Jeffrey Brown (Brown), Real Property Appraiser, Multnomah County Oregon, Division of Assessment, Recording & Taxation, appeared on behalf of Defendant. … Richardson v. Clackamas County Assessor, TC–MD No 020869D, WL 21263620, at *2 (Mar 26, 2003) (citing Gangle v. Dept. of Rev., 13 OTR 343, 345 (1995)).
Cited 0 timesUnpublished67 S.W.2d 860 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Feb 7, 1934
See Layton v. Hightower, 118 Tex. 166 , 12 S.W.(2d) 110 ; Jones v. Hickman, 121 Tex. 405 , 48 S.W.(2d) 982 ; Harris v. Willson (Tex. Com. App.) 59 S.W.(2d) 106 . … See Brown v. Fore (Tex. Com. App.) 12 S.W.(2d) 114 , 63 A. L. R. 435.
Cited 14 timesPublishedCity of Asbury Park v. Castagno Tires
13 N.J. Tax 488 · New Jersey Tax Court · Sep 27, 1993
Co., Inc. v. … Oughton v.
Cited 4 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jan 22, 1999
Hill v. Board of Education, 944 P.2d 930 , 931 (Okla. 1997). … See, e.g., Perry v. Sindermann, 408 U.S. 593 (1972); Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564 (1972). As quoted in the case Marshall Oil Corporation v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedIn re the Accounting of Judson
206 Misc. 157 · New York Surrogate's Court · Jul 2, 1954
In Lewis v. Howe ( 174 N. … However, in Wright v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedPark Towers South Co. v. A-Lalan Imports, Inc.
101 Misc. 2d 507 · Civil Court of the City of New York · Aug 31, 1979
The New York City Conciliation and Appeals Board has primary jurisdiction over any disputes between landlords and tenants under its jurisdiction (8200 Realty Corp. v Lindsay, 27 NY2d 124 ). … Petitioner contends that in Matter of Koppel’s Realty Corp. v New York City Conciliation & Appeals Bd.
Cited 4 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 6, 1989
SEE SPEARMAN V. … V.
Cited 0 timesPublishedMoran v. Comptroller of City of New York
65 Misc. 2d 67 · Civil Court of the City of New York · Nov 13, 1970
We do not find that the holding in Matter of Ainsberg v. … Section v of that subheading states: “ v) If by the application of the foregoing adjustments, an employee’s salary on July 1,1965 or on the date of his appointment later than July 1,1965 is less than $11,500 such employee
Reversed on other grounds by Moran v. Comptroller of New York, 69 Misc. 2d 224 (1971)Cited 1 timesPublished5 Redf. 353 · New York Surrogate's Court · Jan 15, 1882
But while the amount of the penalty of the bond is large enough, the surety Brown, is insufficient. … When the bond was executed, Brown could and did justify in more than the amount of its penalty ; but he has since met with reverses, *357 and is nob now worth over §8,000, and that is not enough.
Cited 1 timesPublished2004 NCBC 5 · North Carolina Business Court · Apr 16, 2004
Marcoux v. … The Board’s Activities {85} The Board was not required to conduct an auction. Barker v. Amsted Ind., 567 A.2d 1279 (Del. 1989). The Board tested the market before executing the Merger Agreement.
Cited 5 timesPublishedOklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 15, 1970
In consequence, the Order of the Board of County Commissioners is presently in effect. In Edge v. … In Butler v.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna