Case law

Opinion No. 72-253 (1972) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jan 12, 1973

and the relationship of the United States and their powers concerning waters within the State is found in the case of Oklahoma Water Resources Board v. … This expansion of the power of the Oklahoma Water Resources Board coupled with the Oklahoma Supreme Court's pronouncement in The Oklahoma Water Resources Board v.

Opinion No. (1999)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jan 29, 1999

Oklahoma Journal Publishing Company v. Oklahoma City, 620 P.2d 452 , 454 (Okl.Ct.App. 1980). … City of Duncan v. Bingham, 394 P. 2d 456 , 460 (Okla. 1964).

In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Stiles

7 Mills Surr. 290 · New York Surrogate's Court · Oct 15, 1909

Snyder, who in fact furnished the board, was only by affinity; and, under the doctrine of Gallagher v. Vought, 8 Hun, 87 , was not of itself sufficient to repel an implication of agreement to pay for the board. … Pellettreau v. Smith, 30 Barb. 494 ; Matter of Franklin, 26 Misc. Rep. 107 ; Kohler v. Knapp, 1 Bradf. 241 ; Haven v. Haven, 1 Redf. 374 .

Opinion No. (2005)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 5, 2005

Brotton Corp. v. Okla. … The adoption of this rule prevents the potential discriminatory application of the Board's discretion. See Hennessey v. Indep. Sch. Dist.

Ringgold v. Graham

13 S.W.2d 355 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Feb 13, 1929

Daniels v. Larendon, 49 Tex. 216 ; Labadie v. Dean, 47 Tex. 90 ; Gordon v. Robertson, 26 Ga. 410 ; Benson v. Shines, 107 Ga. 406 , 33 S. E. 439 ; Griswold v. Thornton, 129 Ala. 454 , 30 So. 717 . … J. § 1152; Gordon v. Camp, 2 Fla. 23 ; Sanders v. Mathewson, 121 Ga. 302 , 48 S. E. 946 ; Beckwith v. Kansas City & O. R. Co., 28 Kan. 485 ; Alvord & Sons v. Mallory & Sons, 10 Ky. Law Rep. 80 ; Brown v. Brown, 12 S.

Steak & Ale Restaurants of America v. Commonwealth

70 Pa. D. & C.2d 582 · Pennsylvania Environmental Hearing Board · Sep 17, 1974

in Commonwealth v. … But, even if appellant’s “cause of action” did not arise until after the appeal period for appeals from board orders had expired, it is clear that the previous ad *593 judication of the board in Commonwealth v.

Jimenez, Noe v. Orlando Arauz

2023 TN WC 69 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Sep 28, 2023

. § 20-16-101 (2022); see also Rye v. Women’s Care Ctr. of Memphis, MPLLC, 477 8.W.3d 235, 264 (Tenn. 2015). If Mr. Arauz meets this burden, Mr. … See the Rules governing the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board on the Bureau’s website If neither party timely files an appeal with the Appeals Board, the trial court’s Order will become final by operation of law thirty

Opinion No. (1998)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 27, 1998

Marley v. Cannon, 618 P.2d 401 , 405 (Okla. 1980). A. … State v. Warren, 331 P.2d 405 , 408 (Okla. 1958) (Board of Agriculture has implied right to seek injunction to prevent violation of Oklahoma egg law); Board of Examiners in Veterinary Medicine v.

Pleasantville City v. California Apartment Associates

4 N.J. Tax 519 · New Jersey Tax Court · Aug 17, 1982

See Newark v. Fischer, 3 N.J. 488, 492, 493 , 70 A.2d 733 (1950); Prospect Hill Apt’s v. … Howard v. Paterson, 6 N.J. 373, 377 , 78 A.2d 893 (1951); Fraser v. Teaneck, 1 N.J. 503 , 64 A.2d 345 (1949).

Southwest Nat. Bank v. Employers' Indemnity Corp.

12 S.W.2d 189 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Jan 2, 1929

In Martin-Brown Co. v. … Martin-Brown Oo. v. Auld, supra; Kelsay Lbr. Co. v. Rot-sky (Tex. Civ. App.) 178 S. W. 837 . 3.

Opinion No. (1990)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Dec 19, 1990

HOOVER V. BRACKEN ENERGIES. INC. V. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR, 723 F.2D 1488 (10TH CIR. 1983), CERT. DENIED, 105 S.CT. 93 ; CLINKENBEARD V. FRAZIER, 582 P.2D 413 (OKL. APP. 1978). … IT IS INAPPROPRIATE FOR THE ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE TO USURP THE BOARD'S RESPONSIBILITY IN INTERPRETING ITS STATUTE, ESPECIALLY WHEN MATTERS ARE PENDING BEFORE THE BOARD.

Stansbury, Pamela v. Federal Express Corp., Docket No. 2025-80-2001

2025 TN WC App. 43 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Sep 8, 2025

TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD Pamela Stansbury Docket No. 2025-80-2001 v. … See Long v. Hamilton-Ryker, No. 2015-07- 0023, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 23, at *15 (Tenn. Workers’ Comp. App.

Shepherd, Stephen V. Haren Construction Co., Inc.

2016 TN WC 40 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Feb 19, 2016

See Long v. Mid-Tennessee Ford Truck Sales, 160 S.W.3d 504, 511 (Tenn. 2005); Vinson v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co., 655 s. W.2d 931, 932-33 (Tenn. 1987). … The Supreme Court held in Buchanan v. Mission Ins.

Jones, Anthony v. Trojan Labor of Nashville, LLC

2016 TN WC 82 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Apr 13, 2016

See Silas v. Brock Services, No. 2014-02-0013, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. 35, at *9 (Tenn. Workers’ Comp. App. Bd. Oct. 2, 2015). Mr. … See Silas v. Brock Services, No. 2014-02-0013, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 35, at *11-12 (Tenn. Workers’ Comp. App. Bd.

In re the Estate of Durkin

165 Misc. 366 · New York Surrogate's Court · Nov 16, 1937

(Brown v. Quintard, 177 N. Y. 75 .) *368 The cases relied on to support the opposite conclusion are readily distinguishable. In Matter of Stanton ( 230 App. … (Brown v. Quintard, supra; Bradhurst v. Field, 135 N. Y. 564 ; Matter of Andrews, 213 App. Div. 479 ; Matter of Willis, 158 Misc. 534 ; Leland v.

Opinion No. (2001)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 8, 2001

Alcoholic Beverage Control Bd. v. Moss, 509 P.2d 666 , 668 (Okla. 1973) (quoting Boydston v. … Ethics Comm'n v. Keating, 958 P.2d 1250 , 1256 (Okla. 1998) (citing City of Duncan v. Bingham, 394 P.2d 456 , 459-60 (Okla. 1964)).

Westmark Partners v. West Deptford Township

12 N.J. Tax 591 · New Jersey Tax Court · Sep 24, 1992

As Judge Rimm stated in Terrace View Gardens v. … Compare S A I J Realty, Inc. v.

Blakney, James v. YRC. Inc.

2018 TN WC 190 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Nov 28, 2018

Scott v. Integrity Staffing Solutions, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 24, at *6 (Aug. 18, 2015). … Willis v. All Staff, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 42, at *18 (Nov. 9, 2015); see also Tenn.

City of Newark v. Newark & Essex Building Corp.

25 N.J. Misc. 228 · New Jersey Tax Court · Mar 25, 1947

Haworth v. State Board, 127 N. J. L. 67; 21 Atl. Rep. (2d) 309; City of Plainfield v. State Board, 19 N. J. Mis. R. 313; 19 Atl. Rep. (2d) 195. … In Haworth v. State Board of Tax Appeals, 127 N. J. L. 67; 21 Atl.

Berkeley Arms Apartment Corp. v. City of Hackensack

7 N.J. Tax 457 · New Jersey Tax Court · Jul 5, 1985

Co. v. … Becker, Inc. v.