Case law

Opinion No. (1979) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 17, 1979

City of Ardmore, v. Excise Board of Carter County, Okl., 197 P.2d 961 (1948). The county excise board is not authorized to refuse to make appropriations required by law to be made. Excise Board of Creek County v. … City of Ardmore v. Excise Board of Carter County, 155 Okl. 126 , 8 P.2d 2 (1932).

Levy v. Eastern Airlines

113 Misc. 2d 847 · Civil Court of the City of New York · Apr 23, 1982

The traveler has no choice other than to rely on such oral confirmations. v- The behavior of Pan American, however, as opposed to that of Eastern, must come under more intense scrutiny. … Corp. v United States, 499 F2d 1255.)

In re Lenox's Estate

9 N.Y.S. 895 · New York Surrogate's Court · Apr 17, 1890

The district attorney objects to the report of the appraiser because he has failed to report as subject to the collateral tax legacies to the Lenox Library, Board of Home Missions and Board of Foreign Missions of the Presbyterian … Under the decision in Catlin v. Trustees, 113 N. Y. 133 , 20 N. E. Rep. 864, the legacy to the American Bible Society is subject to the tax.

Tong v. Dunn

2012 NCBC 29 · North Carolina Business Court · May 18, 2012

Tong v. Dunn, 2012 NCBC 29. … Tong refused to sign off on the board minutes of the Board meeting because of this minutes for one of the key board meetings from omission.

Russell, Jr., William v. Futuristic, Inc.

2017 TN WC App. 7 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Jan 24, 2017

TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD William Russell, Jr. ) Docket No. 2016-02-0299 ) v. … Hadzic v. Averitt Express, No. 2014-02-0064, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 14, at *13 n.4 (Tenn. Workers’ Comp. App. Bd. May 18, 2015).

Fidelity Federal Savings & Loan v. Jennings County Assessor

836 N.E.2d 1075 · Indiana Tax Court · Nov 3, 2005

STANDARD OF REVIEW This Court gives great deference to final determinations of the Indiana Board when it acts within the seope of its authority. Miller Village Prop. Co. v. … See T.R. 8(C); Lee v.

RAY, KELLY v. LEWIS BROS. BAKERY, INC. OF TN

2026 TN WC 74 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · May 27, 2026

WORKERS’ COMPENSATION CLAIMS AT MURFREESBORO KELLY RAY Docket No. 2025-50-4092 Employee, State File No. 61607-2024 v. … The Court Clerk will prepare the record for submission to the Appeals Board, and you will receive notice once it has been submitted.

EASON, ADRIANNE v. FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION

2026 TN WC 18 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Mar 9, 2026

Carpenter v. Am. Water Heater Co., 2024 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 26, at *6-7 (July 12, 2024) (citing Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-203(c)). … The Court Clerk will prepare the record for submission to the Appeals Board, and you will receive notice once it has been submitted.

Newton Town v. Newton Medical Building

13 N.J. Tax 462 · New Jersey Tax Court · Dec 10, 1993

Stores Co. v. Borough of Morris Plains, 100 N.J. 418, 431 , 495 A.2d 1313 (1985), contending that F.M.C. Stores Co. modified both Matawan Boro. v. … See Gabrellian & Jessourian v. Oakland, 11 N.J.Tax 310, 317-19 (Tax 1990) and Abe Schrader Corp. v. Secaucus, 8 N.J.Tax 390 (Tax 1986).

Opinion No. (1985)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 10, 1985

Marley v. Cannon , 618 P.2d 401 (Okla. 1980). We next examine the Administrative Procedures Act, supra, to ascertain if it grants the Board such authority. … Co. v.

Opinion No. 68-135 (1968) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 11, 1968

Herrin v. Arnold, 183 Okl. 392 , 82 P.2d 979 ;School District No. 24, et al. v. Hodge, 199 Okl. 81 , 133 P.2d 575 ; Hatfield v. Jimerson, Co. Supt., Okl., 365 P.2d 980 . … of the rules and regulations of the State Board of Education.

Opinion No. 78-207 (1978) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 31, 1978

In Zeilenga v. … Groendyke Transport, Inc. v. Gardner, Okl., 353 P.2d 695 (1960). It is further reflected in State v. Oakes, Okl., 281 P.2d 749 , 753 (1955), citing Board of County Commissioners of Creek County v.

Preparatory Training Institute v. City of Trenton

19 N.J. Misc. 543 · New Jersey Tax Court · Sep 9, 1941

Distinguish the situation of the purchasers of government property in New Brunswick v. United States (1928), 276 U. S. 547 , and in Hance v. New Brunswick (Supreme Court, 1929), 7 N. J. Mis. R. 610; 146 Atl. Rep. 763 . … In this case, so far as it exists, the right is vested in the Board of Education of the State of New Jersey. James Hance v. City of New Brunswick, New Jersey Tax Reports 1912-1934, 441 (at p. 444).

EVANS, PATRICIA v. KROGER COMPANY

2025 TN WC 55 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Aug 12, 2025

Code Ann. § 50-6-239(c)(6) (2024); McCord v. Advantage Human Resourcing, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 6, at *7-8, 9 (Mar. 27, 2015). … The Court Clerk will prepare the record for submission to the Appeals Board, and you will receive notice once it has been submitted.

Opinion No. 75-322 (1976) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jan 9, 1976

The doctrine of affinity is explained in the case of State v. Hooper, 140 Kan. 481 , 37 P.2d 52 , as follows: "Degrees of relationship by affinity are computed as are degrees of relationship by consanguinity. … Hettinger v. State Deposit Trust Co. of Baltimore, Md., 79 A. 205 . Accordingly, under the factual situation you outlined in your request, the two board members previously referred to are not related by affinity.

In re Bruno

69 A.3d 780 · Court of Judicial Discipline of Pennsylvania · May 24, 2013

The Board seeks this order under Article V, § 18(d)(2) of the Pennsylvania Constitution. … This type of order is authorized by Article V, § 18(b)(5) of the Constitution and is to be entered in cases where the Board has filed formal charges, and only after “a hearing or hearings.”

In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Proceeding of Bauerdorf

9 Mills Surr. 464 · New York Surrogate's Court · Oct 15, 1912

Drake v. Drake, 134 N. Y. 220 ; Soper v. Brown, 136 id. 244 ; United States Trust Co. v. Tobias, 21 Abb. N. C. 392 . Renotice decree for settlement.

525 Realty Holding Co. v. Borough of Hasbrouck Heights

3 N.J. Tax 206 · New Jersey Tax Court · Aug 21, 1981

The assessments and county board judgment reflect the following: Block 153, Lot 1 Block 133, Lot 11-20 Assessment County Board Assessment County Board Land $ 47,500 $ 47,500 $ 38,000 $ 38,000 Improvements 253,200 137,500 … New Brunswick v.

Velleros, Inc. v. Patterson

2015 NCBC 15 · North Carolina Business Court · Feb 23, 2015

Velleros, Inc. v. Patterson, 2015 NCBC 15. … Baxter v. Jones, 14 N.C.

Opinion No. (1994)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 24, 1994

The Oklahoma Supreme Court was persuaded by the decision in the Montana case of Board of Regents of Higher Education v. … The Baker court was also influenced by the Nebraska case of Board of Regents of University of Nebraska v.