Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersSS

10,000+ results

0.43s

  • Parker v. Bailey

    15 S.W.2d 1033 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Apr 10, 1929

    The case of Whitaker v. Browning (Tex. Civ. App.) 155 S. W. 1197 , in which a writ of error was refused, appears to hold to the contrary, and is cited as the latest expression of the Supreme Court Upon the question. … It is unimportant, therefore, whether the Whitaker-Browning Case is to be distinguished from the Byrd Case.

    Cited 43 timesPublished
  • Washington Park Cemetery Ass'n v. Marion County Assessor

    9 N.E.3d 271 · Indiana Tax Court · May 9, 2014

    the Marion County Property Tax Board of Appeals (PTA-BOA). … State v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Millburn Township v. Short Hills Associates

    23 N.J. Tax 311 · New Jersey Tax Court · Feb 6, 2007

    See State by Comm’r of Transp. v. … Ass’n v. Cresskill Borough, 15 N.J.Tax 629 (Tax 1996); Mori v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • In re Application for the Probate of the Will of Backus

    1 Mills Surr. 313 · New York Surrogate's Court · Nov 15, 1899

    See Burnham v. Comfort, 108 N. Y. 540 ; Matter of Dowd, 58 How. Pr. 109 ; Brown v. Brown, 16 Barb. 569 ; McNaughton v. McNaughton, 34 N. Y. 203 ; Adams v. Winne, 7 Paige, 100 -101; Vandemark v. Vandemark, 26 Barb. 418 .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (2003)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 28, 2003

    Riley v. … ROGERS Assistant Attorney General 1 See Morris v. City of Oklahoma City, 299 P.2d 131 , 137-38 (Okla. 1956); Bd. of County Comm'rs v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Marion County Assessor v. Square 74 Associates, LLC

    Indiana Tax Court · Feb 14, 2024

    See Allen v. Scherer, 452 N.E.2d 1031, 1034 (Ind. Ct. … See, e.g., CVS Corp. #6640-02 v. Madison Cnty.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Hudson, Dylan K. v. Coca Cola North American

    2026 TN WC 72 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · May 22, 2026

    Hudson, Docket No. 2025-10-5104 Employee, v. … Edwards v. Peoplease, LLC, No. W2024-01034-SC-R3-WC, 2025 Tenn. LEXIS 514, at *19-20 (Tenn. Dec. 22, 2025). Here, Dr.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Guatemala, Concepion v. Tyson Foods, Inc.

    2022 TN WC 11 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Feb 8, 2022

    Eaves v. Ametek, Inc., 2018 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 53, at *8-9 (Sept. 14, 2018). … To appeal to the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board, you must: 1.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Pitney v. Kelly

    21 N.J. Misc. 405 · New Jersey Tax Court · Nov 8, 1943

    See Colonial Life Insurance Co. v. State Board of Tax Appeals, 126 N. J. L. 126 (at p. 129); 18 Atl. Rep. (2d) 625; Plainfield v. State Board of Tax Appeals, 127 N. J. L. 5; 20 Atl. … See Plainfield v. State Board of Tax Appeals, 127 N. J. L. 5 (at p. 6); 20 Atl. Rep. (2d) 651; City Holding Co. v. State Board of Tax Appeals, 127 N. J. L. 168 (at p. 169); 21 Atl.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1997)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jan 27, 1997

    Berry v. Board of Governors of Registered Dentists, 611 P.2d 628 , 632 (Okla. 1980). … Independent School District No. 89 of Oklahoma County v. Oklahoma City Federation of Teachers, 612 P.2d 719 , 722 (Okla. 1980) (citing Rogers v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • White, Shalanda v. Federal Express Corp.

    2024 TN WC 53 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Jul 24, 2024

    Scott v. Integrity Staffing Solutions, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 24, at *6 (Aug. 18, 2015). She must show by a preponderance of the evidence that she is entitled to the requested benefits. Willis v. … In Ernstes, the Appeals Board instructed that trial courts evaluating the issue of notice should consider the following: A.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Lee,Courtney v. Federal Express Corp.

    2021 TN WC 258 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Dec 21, 2021

    To appeal to the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board, you must: 1. … The appealing party has fifteen calendar days after the date of that notice to submit a brief to the Appeals Board. See the Practices and Procedures of the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • CHARWOOD LLC v. Bartholomew County Assessor

    906 N.E.2d 946 · Indiana Tax Court · May 14, 2009

    Oil, Inc. v. Madison Twp. Assessor, 818 N.E.2d 1006 (Ind. Tax Ct.2004); Lindemann v. Wood, 799 N.E.2d 1230 (Ind. Tax Ct.2003); Wetzel Enter. v. State Bd. of Tax Comm'rs, 694 N.E.2d 1259 (Ind. Tax Ct.1998); Kent Co. v. … The Petitioners also maintained that the only case supporting the PTABOA's interim reassessments, Lakeview Country Club, Inc. v. State Board of Tax Commissioners, 565 N.E.2d 392 (Ind.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Town of West Orange v. Estate of Goldman

    2 N.J. Tax 582 · New Jersey Tax Court · Jun 25, 1981

    The quality of that evidence falls far short of that required to overturn the presumption of correctness attending the county board judgment. Aetna Life Ins. Co. v. Newark, 10 N.J. 99 , 89 A.2d 385 (1952). … Schwartz v. Essex Cty. Bd. of Tax., 129 N.J.L. 129 , 28 A.2d 482 (Sup.Ct. 1942). Judgment will be entered affirming the judgment of the Essex County Board of Taxation.

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • Anderson., Myron v. 84 Lumber Company

    2024 TN WC App. 47 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Dec 9, 2024

    the Appeals Board deems appropriate, in cases that are not legally and/or factually novel or complex.” … Semich v. AT&T Services, Inc., No. 2021-06-0997, 2023 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 28, at *7-8 (Tenn. Workers’ Comp. App. Bd. June 8, 2023) (quoting Johnson v. Nissan N. Am., Inc., 146 S.W.3d 600, 605 (Tenn. Ct.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (2000)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 18, 2000

    If the Board members are public officials, their salaries may not be increased during their terms of office. ¶ 8 The Supreme Court of Oklahoma in Oklahoma City v. Century Indem. … Summey v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • In re Ballentine

    121 A.3d 611 · Court of Judicial Discipline of Pennsylvania · Aug 4, 2015

    The Board has. established by clear and convincing evidence that Judge Bal-lentine’s conduct violated Article V, § 17(b) of the Pennsylvania Constitution. 4. … Judge Ballentine is subject to discipline under Article V, Section 18(d)(1) of the Pennsylvania Constitution. V.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (2005)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 30, 2005

    Smith v. … See also Carter Oil Co. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Jones, Kenneth M. v. Valero Memphis Refinery

    2024 TN WC 37 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Apr 25, 2024

    Jones’s claim to temporary disability benefits, the Appeals Board laid out the requirements for eligibility for these benefits in Jones v. Crencor Leasing and Sales, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. … The Court Clerk will prepare the record for submission to the Appeals Board, and you will receive notice once it has been submitted.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1993)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jan 11, 1993

    Anderson v. … Burdick v. Takushi, 112 S.Ct. at 2063 , quoting from Bullock v. Carter, 405 U.S. 134 , 143 , 92 S.Ct. 849 , 31 L.Ed.2d 92 (1972). Also see Anderson v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.