Opinion

Lee,Courtney v. Federal Express Corp.

  • 2021 TN WC 258
Court
Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims
Filed
Dec 21, 2021
Status
Published
On the bench
Deana C. Seymour
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

FILED

Dec 21, 2021

07:15 AM(CT)

TENNESSEE COURT OF

WORKERS' COMPENSATION

CLAIMS

TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION

IN THE COURT OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION CLAIMS

AT MEMPHIS

COURTNEY LEE, ) Docket No. 2020-08-0214

Employee, )

v. )

FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP., )

Employer, ) State File No. 109468-2019

and )

INDEMNITY INS. CO. OF NORTH )

AMERICA, )

Carrier. ) Judge Deana Seymour

COMPENSATION ORDER

Courtney Lee injured her neck and back pulling a box. The authorized physician

treated Ms. Lee conservatively for cervical and lumbar strains but could not find anything

objective to explain her ongoing complaints. Ms. Lee sought additional medical,

temporary disability, and permanent disability benefits, and the Court held a

Compensation Hearing on December 10, 2021. Based on the proof, the Court awards

medical benefits to the extent Ms. Lee’s compensable injury requires additional treatment

but denies her request for temporary and permanent disability benefits.

History of Claim

Ms. Lee injured her neck and back pulling a box at work on November 2, 2019.

She received conservative treatment with a nurse practitioner, who referred her to an

orthopedist. Federal Express offered a panel, and she chose Dr. Frederick Wolf.

Dr. Wolf treated Ms. Lee with medication, physical therapy, and restricted duty.

He ordered x-rays and MRIs, which were normal except for pre-existing mild facet

arthropathy. Dr. Wolf found nothing to explain Ms. Lee’s complaints of arm and leg

numbness, so he returned her to full duty in December 2019.

1

Ms. Lee next saw Dr. Wolf in January 2020. She told Dr. Wolf she reinjured her

back when she returned to work. He ordered an MRI of her pelvis and thoracic spine, a

repeat MRI of her lumbar spine, and an EMG nerve conduction study of both upper and

lower extremities. All test results were within normal limits.

Dr. Wolf released Ms. Lee at maximum medical improvement on January 23 due

to no objective findings that her condition is work-related. He did not assign restrictions,

and he noted he had nothing further to offer. Later, in a C-32, Dr. Wolf determined that

Ms. Lee retained no permanent impairment. However, he wrote that lifting a box at work

was, more likely than not, “primarily responsible for the injury or primarily responsible

for the need for treatment.”

Ms. Lee disagreed with Dr. Wolf’s diagnoses and disability conclusion and sought

unauthorized treatment for her ongoing symptoms. Records from Delta Health Center

suggested she was diagnosed with cervical and lumbar radiculopathy. However, she did

not obtain a C-32 or deposition from her unauthorized providers to causally relate these

conditions to her work injury.

Ms. Lee testified that she continues to suffer pain in her neck, back, and legs. She

has been referred for further diagnostic testing and treatment, but she cannot afford to pay

out-of-pocket. She maintained that she still does not know what is wrong with her, and

she asked the Court to order benefits so she could find out.

Federal Express did not dispute the work incident occurred but argued that Ms.

Lee’s current need for treatment did not relate to it. Further, Federal Express relied on Dr.

Wolf’s conclusions that Ms. Lee could return to full-duty work and retained no

permanent impairment. It argued that it provided all benefits the law required, including

medical and temporary disability benefits while Ms. Lee was under the care of authorized

providers.

Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law

Ms. Lee must prove all elements of her claim by a preponderance of the evidence

at a Compensation Hearing. Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-239(c)(6) (2021).

To obtain the requested relief, she must prove that her current condition arose

primarily from work. Specifically, this means she must show “to a reasonable degree of

medical certainty that the [incident] contributed more than fifty percent (50%) in causing

the . . . disablement or need for medical treatment, considering all causes.” Tenn. Code

Ann. § 50-6-102(14)(C). Medical evidence is generally required to prove a causal

relationship, “[e]xcept in the most obvious, simple and routine cases.” Berdnik v.

Fairfield Glade Com’ty Club, 2017 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 32, at *10-11 (May

2

18, 2017). The Court finds Ms. Lee’s alleged injury is not routine, and medical evidence

is required to show a causal relationship.

Here, Dr. Wolf related Ms. Lee’s injury to her employment. His C-32 stated that

Ms. Lee’s employment activity of lifting a box at work was, more likely than not,

“primarily responsible for the injury or primarily responsible for the need for treatment.”

Of import, Dr. Wolf’s opinion is presumed correct because Ms. Lee chose him from a

panel. See Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-102(14)(E). Therefore, Ms. Lee is entitled to

continuing medical treatment with Dr. Wolf for any work-related condition.

Turning to Ms. Lee’s request for temporary disability benefits, she must show (1)

total disability from working as the result of a compensable injury; (2) a causal

connection between the injury and the inability to work; and (3) the duration of the period

of disability. Shepherd v. Haren Constr. Co., Inc., 2016 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd.

LEXIS 15, at *13 (Mar. 30, 2016). However, Ms. Lee has not provided evidence to

satisfy these factors. Based on the medical evidence, her unauthorized providers never

took her off work or placed her under restrictions. When she was taken off work and

placed on restrictions shortly after her accident, she received disability benefits while she

treated with her authorized providers.

Moreover, Dr. Wolf returned her to full-duty work in December 2019 and then

placed her at maximum medical improvement on January 23, 2020. Temporary disability

benefits end upon returning to work or reaching maximum medical improvement. Jewell

v. Cobble Const. & Arcus Restoration, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 1, at *21-

22 (Jan. 12, 2015). Ms. Lee has not provided any medical proof to oppose Dr. Wolf’s

determinations regarding her return to work or maximum medical improvement date.

Thus, she has not shown she is entitled to additional temporary disability benefits.

Further, she has not proven entitlement to permanent disability benefits. The only

medical proof on permanent impairment is Dr. Wolf’s C-32, which concluded that Ms.

Lee retains no permanent impairment. Therefore, the Court cannot award her permanent

disability benefits.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED as follows:

1. Federal Express shall continue to provide medical treatment with Dr. Frederick

Wolf for any work-related condition as provided by Tennessee Code Annotated

section 50-6-204.

2. Ms. Lee’s request for temporary and permanent disability benefits is denied.

3. Federal Express shall prepare and file a statistical data form SD2 within ten

business days of the date of this order.

3

4. The filing fee is taxed to Federal Express under Tennessee Compilation Rules and

Regulations 0800-02-21-.07 (August 2019), which shall be paid within five

business days of entry of this order.

5. Unless appealed, this order shall become final thirty days after issuance.

ENTERED December 20, 2021.

____________________________________

JUDGE DEANA C. SEYMOUR

Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims

APPENDIX

Technical Record

1. Petition for Benefit Determination

2. Dispute Certification Notice (filed August 13, 2020)

3. Request for Expedited Hearing, along with Ms. Lee’s affidavit

4. Expedited Hearing Order Denying Requested Relief

5. Scheduling Order

6. Employer’s Motion for Summary Judgment

7. Order Denying Request to Set Hearing

8. Employee’s Pre-Hearing Statement (Two filings)

9. Employee’s Request for Stipulations

10. Pre-Hearing Conference Order

11. Employee’s Pre-Hearing Statement (Addendum)

12. Employee’s Witness List

13. Employer’s Pre-Hearing Statement, along with Employer’s Exhibit and Witness

Lists

14. Dispute Certification Notice (filed November 9, 2021)

Exhibits

1. Delta Health Center record dated April 7, 2020

2. Delta Health Center lab record dated December 7, 2021

3. Earning records (Collective)

4. South Sunflower County Hospital record dated March 13, 2020

5. Excerpts from Exhibit A to Federal Express’s Motion for Summary Judgment

6. Employment records from Federal Express related to its termination procedure

(Collective)

7. Bolivar County Summons to Tenant

4

8. DeSoto Family Medical Center record dated November 12, 2019

9. Delta Health Center records (Collective)

10. Dr. Wolf’s C-32 Final Medical Report

11. Delta Health Center record dated April 7, 2021

12. Emails between Ms. Lee and Sedgwick from TNComp filing 61228 (filed

September 6, 2021) and Emails between Ms. Lee and OrthoSouth and Sedgwick

from TNComp filing 61114 (filed August 31, 2021) (Collective)

13. Wage Statement

14. Choice of Physician Form with emails between Ms. Lee and adjuster

15. DeSoto Family Medical Center records from Federal Express’s Medical Record

Designation

16. OrthoSouth records from Federal Express’s Medical Record Designation

17. MidSouth Imaging records from Federal Express’s Medical Record Designation

18. Dispute Certification Notice dated November 9, 2021

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of this Order was sent as shown on December 21, 2021.

Name Certified Email Service sent to:

Mail USPS

Courtney Lee, X X X Courtney Lee

Self-Represented 506 Yale Street

Employee Cleveland, MS 38732

clee32102@gmail.com

Preston Dennis, X preston@thehuntfirm.com

Employer’s Attorney

_____________________________________

PENNY SHRUM, COURT CLERK

Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims

5

Compensation Hearing Order Right to Appeal:

If you disagree with this Compensation Hearing Order, you may appeal to the Workers’

Compensation Appeals Board or the Tennessee Supreme Court. To appeal to the Workers’

Compensation Appeals Board, you must:

1. Complete the enclosed form entitled: “Notice of Appeal,” and file the form with the

Clerk of the Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims within thirty calendar days of the

date the compensation hearing order was filed. When filing the Notice of Appeal, you

must serve a copy upon the opposing party (or attorney, if represented).

2. You must pay, via check, money order, or credit card, a $75.00 filing fee within ten

calendar days after filing of the Notice of Appeal. Payments can be made in-person at

any Bureau office or by U.S. mail, hand-delivery, or other delivery service. In the

alternative, you may file an Affidavit of Indigency (form available on the Bureau’s

website or any Bureau office) seeking a waiver of the filing fee. You must file the fully-

completed Affidavit of Indigency within ten calendar days of filing the Notice of

Appeal. Failure to timely pay the filing fee or file the Affidavit of Indigency will

result in dismissal of your appeal.

3. You bear the responsibility of ensuring a complete record on appeal. You may request

from the court clerk the audio recording of the hearing for a $25.00 fee. A licensed court

reporter must prepare a transcript and file it with the court clerk within fifteen calendar

days of the filing the Notice of Appeal. Alternatively, you may file a statement of the

evidence prepared jointly by both parties within fifteen calendar days of the filing of the

Notice of Appeal. The statement of the evidence must convey a complete and accurate

account of the hearing. The Workers’ Compensation Judge must approve the statement

of the evidence before the record is submitted to the Appeals Board. If the Appeals

Board is called upon to review testimony or other proof concerning factual matters, the

absence of a transcript or statement of the evidence can be a significant obstacle to

meaningful appellate review.

4. After the Workers’ Compensation Judge approves the record and the court clerk transmits

it to the Appeals Board, a docketing notice will be sent to the parties. The appealing

party has fifteen calendar days after the date of that notice to submit a brief to the

Appeals Board. See the Practices and Procedures of the Workers’ Compensation

Appeals Board.

To appeal your case directly to the Tennessee Supreme Court, the Compensation Hearing

Order must be final and you must comply with the Tennessee Rules of Appellate

Procedure. If neither party timely files an appeal with the Appeals Board, the trial court’s

Order will become final by operation of law thirty calendar days after entry. See Tenn.

Code Ann. § 50-6-239(c)(7).

For self-represented litigants: Help from an Ombudsman is available at 800-332-2667.

NOTICE OF APPEAL

Tennessee Bureau of Workers’ Compensation

www.tn.gov/workforce/injuries-at-work/

wc.courtclerk@tn.gov | 1-800-332-2667

Docket No.: ________________________

State File No.: ______________________

Date of Injury: _____________________

___________________________________________________________________________

Employee

v.

___________________________________________________________________________

Employer

Notice is given that ____________________________________________________________________

[List name(s) of all appealing party(ies). Use separate sheet if necessary.]

appeals the following order(s) of the Tennessee Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims to the

Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (check one or more applicable boxes and include the date file-

stamped on the first page of the order(s) being appealed):

□ Expedited Hearing Order filed on _______________ □ Motion Order filed on ___________________

□ Compensation Order filed on__________________ □ Other Order filed on_____________________

issued by Judge _________________________________________________________________________.

Statement of the Issues on Appeal

Provide a short and plain statement of the issues on appeal or basis for relief on appeal:

________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________

Parties

Appellant(s) (Requesting Party): _________________________________________ ☐Employer ☐Employee

Address: ________________________________________________________ Phone: ___________________

Email: __________________________________________________________

Attorney’s Name: ______________________________________________ BPR#: _______________________

Attorney’s Email: ______________________________________________ Phone: _______________________

Attorney’s Address: _________________________________________________________________________

* Attach an additional sheet for each additional Appellant *

LB-1099 rev. 01/20 Page 1 of 2 RDA 11082

Employee Name: _______________________________________ Docket No.: _____________________ Date of Inj.: _______________

Appellee(s) (Opposing Party): ___________________________________________ ☐Employer ☐Employee

Appellee’s Address: ______________________________________________ Phone: ____________________

Email: _________________________________________________________

Attorney’s Name: _____________________________________________ BPR#: ________________________

Attorney’s Email: _____________________________________________ Phone: _______________________

Attorney’s Address: _________________________________________________________________________

* Attach an additional sheet for each additional Appellee *

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, _____________________________________________________________, certify that I have forwarded a

true and exact copy of this Notice of Appeal by First Class mail, postage prepaid, or in any manner as described

in Tennessee Compilation Rules & Regulations, Chapter 0800-02-21, to all parties and/or their attorneys in this

case on this the __________ day of ___________________________________, 20 ____.

______________________________________________

[Signature of appellant or attorney for appellant]

LB-1099 rev. 01/20 Page 2 of 2 RDA 11082

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.