Case law

S. Axelrod Co. v. Mel Dixon Studio, Inc.

122 Misc. 2d 770 · Civil Court of the City of New York · Oct 7, 1983

The Loft Board may only apply the policy declared by the Loft Law and the rules and standards laid down in that statute. (See Matter of Small v *777 Moss, 279 NY, at p 297 ; cf. … (Matter of Small v Moss, 279 NY, at pp 298-299.) The adoption of a primary residence requirement by the" Loft Board is thus in derogation of article 7-C.

Opinion No. (2010)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 29, 2010

Menefee v. Askew , 107 P. 159 , 162(Okla. 1910). … Draper v.

In re Sullivan

135 A.3d 1164 · Court of Judicial Discipline of Pennsylvania · Jan 14, 2016

The Judicial Conduct Board is empowered by Article V, § 18 of the Constitution of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania to file formal charges alleging ethical misconduct on the part of judges, justices or justices of the peace … “The CJD has original jurisdiction over actions alleging judicial wrongdoing prosecuted by the Board. See Pa. Const. Art. V, § 18(b)(5).

Big Moose Development Inc. v. Multnomah County Assessor

Oregon Tax Court · Jan 11, 2013

Defendant was represented by Jeff Sanders (Sanders), Oregon Registered Appraiser III, and Jeff Brown (Brown), Residential Appeals Lead Appraiser, Multnomah County Assessor‟s office. … Plaintiff appealed the assessor‟s values to the Multnomah County Board of Property Tax Appeals (Board) and the Board sustained the values.

In Re Nakoski Ex Rel. Magisterial District 06-3-01

742 A.2d 260 · Court of Judicial Discipline of Pennsylvania · Jun 3, 2001

The cases cited by the Board are: Matter of Glancey, 518 Pa. 276 , 542 A.2d 1350 (1988); Matter of Cunningham, 517 Pa. 417 , 538 A.2d 473 (1988); Judicial Inquiry and Review Board v. … In Commonwealth v.

Frisina v. City of Newark

15 N.J. Tax 357 · New Jersey Tax Court · Jul 24, 1995

Sites v. … Ltd. v.

Evesham Township v. Nye

3 N.J. Tax 183 · New Jersey Tax Court · Aug 10, 1981

timely filed. *186 In support of his position defendant cites Passaic v. … White v. Tax Appeals Bd., 123 N.J.L. 350, 353 , 8 A.2d 819 (Sup.Ct.1939); Fahey v. Jersey City, 52 N.J. 103, 107 , 244 A.2d 97 (1968).

Opinion No. (2000)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 4, 2000

See Sharp v. … See Nauni v.

In re the Construction of the Will of Searle

13 Misc. 2d 912 · New York Surrogate's Court · Aug 19, 1958

Y. 283 ; Brown v. Quintard, 177 N. Y. 75 ).” … Dwight v. Fancher, 245 N. Y. 71 ; Matter of Tamargo, 220 N. Y. 225 ; Matter of Smith, 254 N. Y. 283 ; Brown v. Quintard, 177 N. Y. 75 ; Matter of Deane, 4 N Y 2d 326; Matter of Bloomberg, 6 A D 2d 132).

Opinion No. (1990)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 8, 1990

ROTRAMEL V. PUBLIC SERVICE CO., 546 P.2D 1015, 1017 (OKLA. 1975). TEXAS OKLAHOMA EXPRESS V. SORENSON, 652 P.2D 285, 257 (OKLA. 1982) (DICTA). … SEE, MARYLAND CASUALTY COMPANY V. KING, 381 P.2D 153 (OKLA. 1963).

Pettiford, Charles v. Express Services, Inc.

2020 TN WC 1 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Jan 7, 2020

. § 20-16-101; see also Rye v. Women’s Care Ctr. of Memphis, MPLLC, 477 8.W.3d 235, 264 (Tenn. 2015). If Express Services satisfies its burden, then Mr. … Inds., Inc. v. Sloan, 1988 Tenn. App. LEXIS 592, *4 (Tenn. Ct. App.

In Re McCarthy

828 A.2d 25 · Court of Judicial Discipline of Pennsylvania · Jul 14, 2003

An Amended Complaint was filed on October' 11, 2002, raising seven counts of public conduct which the Board alleged would subject the Respondent to discipline under the Pennsylvania Constitution, Article V, § 18(d)(1). … Counts 1 and 3 of the Board’s Complaint allege that said conduct brings the judicial office into disrepute in violation of Section 18(d) of Article V of the Pennsylvania Constitution.

People v. NYRA & Barterama, Inc.

126 Misc. 2d 783 · Criminal Court of the City of New York · Aug 31, 1984

Mindful of the Court of Appeals decision in Namro I, I adopt the procedure announced in People v Brown, ( 40 NY2d 381 [1976]), and subsequently codified in CPL 290.10 (1) (b). 4 This *794 mechanism will insure appellate review … (United States v Scott, 437 US 82 [1978]; People v Brown, 40 NY2d 381 ; People v Marin, 102 AD2d 14 [2d Dept 1984].)

CCP Crestview 1505 LLC v. Multnomah County Assessor

Oregon Tax Court · Mar 28, 2024

The subject property’s 2021-22 tax roll real market value, sustained by the board of property tax appeals (board), was $10,561,070. (Compl at 3.) Its maximum assessed value and assessed value were each $7,435,440. … Rivers Edge, 359 Or at 827; see also Powell Street I, LLC v.

Spiotta Bros. v. Township of Mine Hill

1 N.J. Tax 42 · New Jersey Tax Court · Mar 4, 1980

Township’s contention that taxpayer cannot question the 1977 county board judgment by reason of its failure to file a cross-appeal is clearly erroneous. In Hackensack v. … Co. v. Newark, 10 N.J. 99 , 89 A.2d 385 (1952). The testimony here with regard to the 1975 county tax board judgment falls far short of satisfying that criteria.

A N Associates, Inc. v. Quotron Systems, Inc.

159 Misc. 2d 515 · Civil Court of the City of New York · Sep 27, 1993

(Barrister Referrals v Windels, Marx, Davies & Ives, 169 AD2d 622 [1st Dept 1991].) … (Greene v Hellman, 51 NY2d, at 206 ; see also, Simon v Electrospace Corp., 28 NY2d 136 [1971] [applying same framework where plaintiff was "finder of business opportunities”].)

Holt, Jeremy v. Professional Touch Cleaning of the Tri-Cities

2024 TN WC 51 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Jul 22, 2024

Bullard v. Facilities Perf. Grp., 2018 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 37, at *7 (Aug. 7, 2018). Typically, an employer furnishes medical treatment after an injury at work under section 50-6-204. … The Court Clerk will prepare the record for submission to the Appeals Board, and you will receive notice once it has been submitted.

Opinion No. 80-032 (1980) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 1, 1980

As the Court noted in Oklahoma County Excise Board v. … Board of Education v.

Opinion No. (1992)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 30, 1992

JACKSON V. INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 16, 648 P.2D 26, 29 (OKLA. 1982). … CAVE SPRINGS PUBLIC SCHOOL DISTRICT I-30 V. BLAIR, 613 P.2D 1046 (OKLA. 1980).

Neal, Wendy v. Moore Construction Co. Inc.

2019 TN WC 88 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · May 30, 2019

CLAIMS AT NASHVILLE WENDY NEAL, ) Employee, ) Docket No. 2017-06-1025 ) v. … To appeal to the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board, you must: 1.