Case law

Retreat Cooperative, Inc. v. Joseph P. O'Connor, Marion County Assessor

Indiana Tax Court · Jan 20, 2015

The second requirement, that a case be an initial appeal of the Indiana Board’s final determination, includes the exhaustion of administrative remedies requirement. See State Bd. of Tax Comm’rs v. … See Johnson v.

Indemnity Ins. Co. of North America v. Williams

99 S.W.2d 905 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Jan 6, 1937

Dave Jones v. Texas Employers Insurance Association (Tex.Com.App.) 99 S.W.(2d) 903 , this day decided. … See Texas Employers Insurance Association v. Guidry (Tex.Com.App.) 99 S.W.(2d) 900 , this day decided.

Opinion No. (2010)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 29, 2010

Menefee v. Askew , 107 P. 159 , 162(Okla. 1910). … Draper v.

1125-1127 Clinton Avenue Associates v. Town of Irvington

2 N.J. Tax 386 · New Jersey Tax Court · Apr 28, 1981

judgment “freeze” statute, the court in Newark v. … This case is distinguishable from the factual situation in Snyder v.

Perkins v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.

299 S.W. 213 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Oct 26, 1927

These agreements were signed and filed with the Industrial Accident Board and approved by the board. … Jordan v. Dennis, 7 Metc. (Mass.) 590; Gilman v. Thompson, 11 Vt. 643 , 34 Am. Dec. 714 .

City of Woodburn v. Domogalla

1 Or. Tax 292 · Oregon Tax Court · Apr 30, 1963

It and one or two state boards of tax appeal, as well as Senator Musa’s personal background in administrative proceedings as a certified public accountant, were the influencing factors in the choice in 1949 of the board of … State ex rel Appling v. Chase, 224 Or 112, 116, 355 P2d 631 (1960). A court with less than general jurisdiction would be scarcely more than a substitute for a board of tax appeals.

Holt, Jeremy v. Professional Touch Cleaning of the Tri-Cities

2024 TN WC 51 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Jul 22, 2024

Bullard v. Facilities Perf. Grp., 2018 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 37, at *7 (Aug. 7, 2018). Typically, an employer furnishes medical treatment after an injury at work under section 50-6-204. … The Court Clerk will prepare the record for submission to the Appeals Board, and you will receive notice once it has been submitted.

YEOMAN, DAMIEN v. TRANSWOOD LOGISTICS, INC.

2025 TN WC 49 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Jul 30, 2025

IN THE COURT OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION CLAIMS AT KNOXVILLE DAMIEN YEOMAN, ) Docket No. 2024-30-2931 Employee, ) v. … Ernstes v. Printpack Inc., 2023 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 25, at *34 (June 6, 2023).

Dennis, Christopher v. Memphis Light, Gas & Water

2019 TN WC App. 56 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Dec 23, 2019

Bates v. Command Ctr., Inc., No. 2014-06- 0053, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 10, at *3 (Tenn. Workers’ Comp. App. Bd. Apr. 2, 2015). … Akard v. Akard, No. E2013-00818-COA-R3-CV, 2014 Tenn. App. LEXIS 766, at *11 (Tenn. Ct. App. Nov. 25, 2014); see also Bucher v. Diversco, No. 2015-05-0184, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 46, at *9 (Tenn.

Opinion No. (2007)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 12, 2007

V. … Id .; Marley v. Cannon , 618 P.2d 401 , 405 (Okla. 1980).

Gary II LLC v. Lake County Assessor

Indiana Tax Court · Mar 13, 2025

Co. v. Riley, 299 N.E.2d 173, 174 (Ind. 1973) (considering zoning for future use as probative valuation evidence). The Indiana Board found that Gary II did not support its claim with probative evidence. … Inland Steel Co. v. State Bd. of Tax Comm’rs, 739 N.E.2d 201, 212 (Ind.

Evesham Township v. Nye

3 N.J. Tax 183 · New Jersey Tax Court · Aug 10, 1981

timely filed. *186 In support of his position defendant cites Passaic v. … White v. Tax Appeals Bd., 123 N.J.L. 350, 353 , 8 A.2d 819 (Sup.Ct.1939); Fahey v. Jersey City, 52 N.J. 103, 107 , 244 A.2d 97 (1968).

Prospect Hill Apts. v. Flemington

1 N.J. Tax 224 · New Jersey Tax Court · Nov 26, 1979

Newark v. Fischer, 3 N.J. 488 , 70 A.2d 733 (1950); Clairol, Inc. v. Kingsley, 109 N.J. Super. 22 , 262 A.2d 213 (App.Div. 1970), aff'd 57 N.J. 199 , 270 A.2d 702 (1970). Cf. Danis v. Middlesex Cty. … White v. Violent Crimes Comp. Bd., 76 N.J. 368 , 379 , 388 A.2d 206 , 211 (1978).

Shurina, George v. FedEx Ground

2025 TN WC App. 64 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Dec 30, 2025

Gregory Joseph Shurina, Decedent Employee State File No. 16323-2021 v. … In Grose v. Stone, No. W2023-00090-COA-R3-CV, 2024 Tenn. App. LEXIS 186 (Tenn. Ct. App.

First Baptist Church v. City of Fort Worth

26 S.W.2d 196 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Apr 9, 1930

Biencourt v. Parker, 27 Tex. 558 ; Odem v. Sinton Independent School District (Tex. Com. App.) 234 S. W. 1090 . … See, also, Allen v. Fidelity Co., 269 Ill. 234 , 109 N. E. 1035 ; Hatfield v. Mingo County Court, 80 W. Va. 165 , 92 S. E. 245 ; State v. Powell, 109 Ohio St. 383 , 142 N. E. 401 .

Jackson v. Township of Neptune

15 N.J. Tax 498 · New Jersey Tax Court · Mar 27, 1996

N.J.S.A. 2A:34-3 sets out the requirements for a judgment of divorce from bed and board. In Lavino v. … In [divorce from bed and board] the marital bond subsists____” Id. at 639 , 130 A.2d 369 (citations omitted); Weinkrantz v. Weinkrantz 129 N.J.Super. 28, 32 , 322 A.2d 184 (App. Div.1974); Mueller v.

Vela v. Shacklett

12 S.W.2d 1007 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Jan 23, 1929

Dec. 240 ; Brown v. Vandyke, 8 N. J. Eq. 795, 55 Am. Dec. 250 ; Goodale v. Wallace, 19 S. D. 405, 103 N. W. 651 , 117 Am. St. Rep. 962 , 9 Ann. Cas. 545; Cook v. Courtright, 40 Ohio St. 248 , 48 Am. Rep. 681 ; Brown v. … Cook v. Courtright, 40 Ohio St. 248 , 48 Am. Rep. 681 ; Hawley v. Howell, 60 Iowa, 79 , 14 N. W. 199 ; Borner v. Prescott, 150 Wis. 197 , 136 N. W. 552 ; Cutler v. Madison County, 56 Miss. 115 .

Carbone v. Carbone

166 Misc. 924 · New York Family Court · Mar 17, 1938

(Van Dover v. Van Dover, 247 App. Div. 813 ; Stevens v. Stevens, 248 id. 344; affd., 273 N. Y. 157 .) The Court of Appeals affirmed the determination by the Appellate Division in the case of Brown v. Brown ( 242 App. … Under Starbuck v. Starbuck (supra) and Brown v. Brown (supra) she cannot be heard in derogation of the decree which resulted from the proceeding instituted by her.

Romag Realty Corp. v. Saunders

77 Misc. 2d 11 · Civil Court of the City of New York · Jan 9, 1974

(Maguire v. Ardea Realty Corp., 279 App. Div. 904 ; Tomblin v. 1459 Univ. Corp., N. Y. L. J.; March 26, 1953, p. 1014, col. 3, affd. 283 App. Div. 653 ; Romanisky v. Siglon Realty Corp., 122 N. Y. S. 2d 171; Harris v. … As was stated in Matter of Cantelli v.

SELLS, GREGORY S. v. NOVOLEX HOLDINGS, LLC

2025 TN WC 78 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Nov 7, 2025

The Appeals Board set out the standard of proof in an expedited hearing in Buchanan v. Carlex Glass Co., 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. … This case also bears some similarity to the Board’s recent decision in McGuire v. TC Restaurants, LLC, No. 2025-60-0654, 2025 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS __, slip op. at 4-5 (Nov. 5, 2025).