Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
0.72s
Hubler Realty Co. v. Hendricks County Assessor
938 N.E.2d 311 · Indiana Tax Court · Nov 29, 2010
STANDARD OF REVIEW The party seeking to overturn a final determination of the Indiana Board bears the burden of demonstrating its invalidity. Osolo Twp. Assessor v. Elkhart Maple Lane Assocs., 789 N.E.2d 109, 111 (Ind. … That determination was well within the purview of the Indiana Board; this Court will not reverse it absent an abuse of discretion. 5 See, e.g., Stinson v. Trimas Fasteners, Inc., 923 N.E.2d 496, 498-99 (Ind.
Cited 36 timesPublishedRose v. Ohio Rehab. Servs. Comm.
2010 Ohio 852 · Ohio Court of Claims · Feb 5, 2010
[Cite as Rose v. Ohio Rehab. Servs. Comm., 2010-Ohio-852.] … Armstrong v. Best Buy Company, Inc., 99 Ohio St.3d 79, 81, 2003- Ohio-2573, citing Menifee v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedPeyton v. N.Y.C. Bd. of Standards & Appeals
106 N.Y.S.3d 707 · Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · Aug 29, 2019
Motion by The Real Estate Board of New York, Inc. for leave to file a brief amicus curiae on the appeal herein granted and the proposed brief is accepted as filed.
Cited 0 timesPublishedWittemyer v. Multnomah County Assessor
Oregon Tax Court · Jul 24, 2012
of property tax appeals (Board), should be sustained. … Plaintiff appealed all of the values to the Board, and the Board sustained the values. (Id.) Plaintiff timely appealed the Board’s decision to this court.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedFlorida Ass'n of Nurse Anesthetists v. Department of Professional Regulation
21 Fla. Supp. 2d 239 · State of Florida Division of Administrative Hearings · Mar 14, 1986
Plantation Residents Association, Inc. v. School Board of Broward County, 424 So.2d 879 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982); School Board of Broward County v. Grameth, 375 So.2d 340 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979(. … Florida Beverage Corporation v. Wynne, 306 So.2d 200 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975); Grove Isle, Ltd. v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedMadison County Assessor v. Sedd Realty Company
125 N.E.3d 676 · Indiana Tax Court · May 22, 2019
STANDARD OF REVIEW The party seeking to overturn an Indiana Board final determination bears the burden of demonstrating its invalidity. Osolo Twp. Assessor v. … See CVS Corporation (#6689-02) v. Monroe Cty. Assessor, 83 N.E.3d 1281, 1284 (Ind.
Cited 7 timesPublished8 Cow. 43 · Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · Oct 15, 1827
The case of Brown v. Wotton, (Cro. Jac. 73,) holds a different doctrine. That was an action of trover for certain plate. The defendant pleaded a judgment against J. S.; and had him in execution for the damages. … Brown v. Wotton, Cro James, 73; Adam v. Broughton, 2 Strange, 278; Murrell v. Johnson, 1 Hen. & Munf. 450; and Floyd v.
Cited 13 timesPublishedMeridian Towers East & West v. Washington Township Assessor
805 N.E.2d 475 · Indiana Tax Court · Mar 25, 2004
ANALYSIS AND OPINION Standard of Review This Court gives great deference to final determinations of the Indiana Board when it acts within the seope of its authority. Wittenberg Lutheran Vill. Ein-dowment Corp. v. … See Heart City Chrysler v. State Bd. of Tax Comm'rs, 714 N.E.2d 329, 333 (Ind.
Cited 18 timesPublished153 Misc. 2d 84 · Civil Court of the City of New York · Jan 14, 1992
They have sued members of the board of directors, the cooperative corporation and the contractor who worked on the premises. … (Fay’s Drug Co. v British Am. Dev. Corp., 140 AD2d 810 [3d Dept 1988]; Roblee v Corning Community Coll., 134 AD2d 803 [3d Dept 1987].)
Cited 1 timesPublishedLinus Oakes, Inc. v. Department of Revenue
15 Or. Tax 186 · Oregon Tax Court · Jul 20, 2000
See Linus Oakes, Inc. v. Dept. of Rev. 14 OTR 412 (1998). Thereafter, the parties had the property appraised to determine its real market value, and evidence of value was submitted at trial. … After those deductions, Brown had an indicated value by the cost approach of $9,360,000. Applying the direct sales comparison approach, Brown used four sales, one in Oregon and three in California.
Cited 1 timesPublishedBrowning-Ferris Industries of Elizabeth, New Jersey, Inc. v. Director, Division of Taxation
3 N.J. Tax 16 · New Jersey Tax Court · Jun 18, 1981
Plaintiffs Browning-Ferris Industries of Elizabeth, New Jersey, Inc. and Browning-Ferris Industries of South Jersey, Inc. … A case which is of recent origin and very informative upon this phase of taxation is Salem Co. v. State Board, 97 N.J.L. 386 , 117 A. 401 ; affirmed 98 N.J.L. at 570, 119 A. 926 , [7 N.J.Misc. at 26-27, 144 A. 7 .]
Cited 2 timesPublishedNorth Carolina Industrial Commission · Jan 5, 1995
Browne, has migraine headaches with visual blurring and visual aura for which he has been seen by Dr. Timothy Martin and Dr. … G.S. § 97-2 (19); G.S. § 97-25 ; See Braswell v. Pitt County Memorial Hospital , 106 N.C. App. 1 , 415 S.E.2d 86 (1992); Forrest v. Pitt County Board of Education , 100 N.C.
Cited 0 timesPublishedLumbermen's Reciprocal Ass'n v. Henderson
15 S.W.2d 565 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Mar 27, 1929
Fire & Life Assurance Corp. v. La Fair (Tex. Civ. App.) 294 S. W. 247 , Burton v. McGuire (Tex. Civ. App.) 3 S.W.(2d) 576 , Tinsley v. Rusk County, 42 Tex. 40 , and Robertson v. DuBose, 76 Tex. 1 , 13 S. … In view of what has been said herein above and in such cases as Mingus v. Wadley, 115 Tex. 551 , 285 S. W. 1084 , and Oilmen’s Reciprocal Ass’n v. Franklin, 116 Tex. 59 , 286 S.
Cited 36 timesPublished135 Misc. 2d 73 · Criminal Court of the City of New York · Mar 25, 1987
The People place their reliance on People v Gaggi ( 104 AD2d 422 , appeal dismissed 65 NY2d 636 ), People v Brown ( 113 AD2d 812 ) and People v Gadsden (NYLJ, Jan. 21, 1982, at 13, col 3). … The court has examined People v Gaggi (supra), People v Brown (supra) and People v Gadsden (supra) (including the record on appeal for People v Gaggi and People v Brown) and finds that these cases are distinguishable from
Cited 2 timesPublished11 Or. Tax 67 · Oregon Tax Court · Aug 12, 1988
Dept. of Treas., 155 Mich App 778 , 401 NW2d 62 (1986); Comm. of Rev. v. Plymouth Home National Bank, 394 Mass 66, 473 NE2d 1139 (1985). As the court found in Brown v. … Memphis Bank & Trust Co. v. Garner, supra.
Cited 1 timesPublished176 Misc. 2d 226 · New York Court of Claims · Oct 1, 1997
Tea Co., 208 AD2d 111 (1st Dept 1995); Brown v Brown, 87 AD2d 680 (3d Dept 1982), supra; Loeb v Teitelbaum, 77 AD2d 92, amended 80 AD2d 838 (2d Dept 1981); Brown v Town of Henrietta, 118 Misc 2d 133 (Sup Ct 1983), supra Terminations … v *234 Brown, 87 AD2d 680 , supra).
Cited 3 timesPublished627 N.E.2d 880 · Indiana Tax Court · Jan 20, 1994
Fesler v. Bosson (1920), 189 Ind. 484, 492 , 128 N.E. 145, 147 (emphasis added). See also Indiana State Board of Tax Comm'rs v. … The Government Petitioners, though, do not lack standing, and the State Board can therefore find no relief under T.R. 12(B)(6). The State Board claims this court's decision in Marion County Board of Review v.
Cited 40 timesPublishedState of Delaware v. Steven Wu
Delaware Court of Common Pleas · Mar 27, 2026
Under that metric, it is clear there is no ambiguity in the phrase ° Coastal Barge Corp. v. Coastal Zone Industrial Control Board, 492 A. 2d 1242, 1246 (Del. 1985). 7 Arnold y. … Fletcher Brown Mansion vy. City of Wilmington, 34 A.3d 1055, 1059 (Del. 2011). 8 Arnold, 49 A.3d at 1183. ° State v. Taye, 54 A. 3d 1116, 1117 (Del. 2009); 11 Del.
Cited 0 timesPublishedIn re Ancillary Letters of Administration With the Will Annexed of McShane
8 Mills Surr. 277 · New York Surrogate's Court · Jul 15, 1911
Campbell v. Tousey, 7 Cow. 64 . See Brown v. Brown, 4 Edw. Ch. 343 ; s. c. 1 Barb. Ch. 189 . McNamara v. Dwyer, 7 Paige 239 . Gulick v. Gulick, 33 Barb. 92 ; s. c. 21 How. Pr. 22 . … Morrell v. Dickey, 1 Johns. Ch: 153. Chapman v. Fish, 6 Hill, 554 . Vroom v. Van Horne, 10 Paige, 549 . Brown v. Brown, 2 Edw. Ch. 343 . Vermilya v. Beatty, 6 Barb. 429 .
Cited 1 timesPublishedKildsig v. Warrick County Assessor
998 N.E.2d 764 · Indiana Tax Court · Oct 8, 2013
STANDARD OF REVIEW The party seeking to overturn a final determination of the Indiana Board bears the burden of demonstrating its invalidity. Hubler Realty Co. v. Hendricks Cnty. Assessor, 938 N.E.2d 311, 313 (Ind. … A final determination of the Indiana Board is contrary to law if it violates a statute or rule of substantive or procedural law. Shelbyville MHPI, LLC v. Thurston, 978 N.E.2d 527, 529 (Ind. Tax Ct.2012).
Cited 10 timesPublished
Ask Donna