Case law

Hofler v. Spearin, Preston & Burrows, Inc.

51 Misc. 2d 758 · Civil Court of the City of New York · Oct 18, 1966

Whether an employee is engaged in commerce is determined by practical considerations and not by technical conceptions (Mateo v. Auto Rental Co., 240 F. 2d 831 ; Mitchell v. Brown, 224 F. 2d 359 ; Mitchell v. … It was established that this plaintiff was paid for all time on board the boat except for a one-hour meal period in the evening and the ‘ ‘ sleeping time ’ ’ hours from 11 p.m. to 5 a.m., when he was not required on duty.

Baccus v. N.C. Department of Crime Control

North Carolina Industrial Commission · Nov 27, 2007

Brown v. Flowe , 349 N.C. 520 , 507 S.E.2d 894 (1998). … Brown , 349 N.C. at 522 , 507 S.E.2d at 895 . If the language of a statute is unambiguous on its face, then we must construe the statute according to its plain meaning. Lutz v.

Tedford, Daniel v. Energy Savers, LLC

2021 TN WC 236 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Oct 19, 2021

Orman v. Williams Sonoma, Inc., 803 S.W.2d 672, 676 (Tenn. 1991). So, the Court looks to the expert medical evidence to determine if Mr. … The Workers’ Compensation Judge must approve the statement before the record is submitted to the Appeals Board.

In re Benedict's Will

11 N.Y.S. 252 · New York Surrogate's Court · Mar 15, 1889

In Brown v. Clark, 77 N. … Van Cortlandt v. Kip, 1 Hill, 590 , 7 Hill, 346 ; Brown v. Clark, 77 N. Y. 369, 377 . My attention has not been called to any decision in this state adverse to the views herein expressed. The case of Price v.

Girls Friendly Society v. Cape May City

26 N.J. Tax 549 · New Jersey Tax Court · Oct 26, 2012

McQueen v. Brown, 342 N.J.Super. 120, 131 , 775 A.2d 748 (App.Div.2001), aff'd, 175 N.J. 200 , 814 A.2d 1042 (2002) (citing Coletti v. Union Cnty. … See Paterson Rescue Mission v.

Dunbar, Tanya v. Kelly Services, Inc.

2024 TN WC App. 7 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Mar 5, 2024

Brown, noted no “injury” related to these symptoms. He considered the possibility of a deep vein thrombosis, but the diagnostic testing was negative for that condition. … See Mansell v. Bridgestone Firestone N. Am. Tire, LLC, 417 S.W.3d 393, 399 (Tenn. 2013).

Opinion No. (2000)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Oct 18, 2000

Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564 , 570 (1972). Furthermore, ¶ 14 Property interests, of course, are not created by the Constitution. … Id. at 683 (citing Brown's Ferry Waste Disposal Ctr. v.

Bowles v. Bryan

247 S.W. 276 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Jan 24, 1923

Discussing the law as applied to the facts of the case of Browne v. … The necessity for future action on Browne’s part as the condition for the vesture of any interest in his favor made the contract purely executory. Hazlett v. Harwood, 80 Tex. 508 , 16 S. W. 310 ; Tayler v.

In re the Estate of Benson

18 Mills Surr. 443 · New York Surrogate's Court · Feb 15, 1917

It is alleged by the executor that Sarah V. Benson adopted as her daughter Harriet Goodwin Browne. Sarah V. Benson was the mother of the decedent and Harriet Thornburg. … The latter was the mother of Harriet Goodwin Browne. Sarah V. Benson, therefore, was the grandmother of Harriet Goodwin Browne, and the latter was a niece of the decedent.

People v. Seepersad

52 Misc. 3d 400 · Criminal Court of the City of New York · Apr 28, 2016

Subsequently, a different panel of that same Court, in People v Rodriguez ( 135 AD3d 587 [1st Dept 2016]), took a radically different approach, yet made no mention of Brown at all. … People v Miller, 113 AD3d 885, 887 [3d Dept 2014]; People v Daniels, 217 AD2d 448 [1st Dept 1995], citing People v Cortes, 80 NY2d 201 [1992].)

Caddell v. Lufkin Land & Lumber Co.

255 S.W. 397 · Texas Commission of Appeals · Nov 7, 1923

Veramendi v. Hutchins, 48 Tex. 531 ; Box v. Word, 65 Tex. 166 ; Hensel v. Kegans, 79 Tex. 347 , 15 S. W. 275 ; Auerbach v. Wylie, 84 Tex. 615 , 19 S. W. 856 , 20 S. … David Brown.

Cotton, Alan v. HUMACare, Inc.

2016 TN WC App. 44 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Sep 14, 2016

’ COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD Karen Cotton, as surviving spouse of ) Docket No. 2015-02-0061 Alan Lee Cotton, Decedent ) ) v. … State v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 18 S.W.3d 186, 193 (Tenn. 2000). If the rule were otherwise, the “courts might well be projected into the limitless field of advisory opinions.” Id.

In re Maxwell's Estate

3 N.Y.S. 422 · New York Surrogate's Court · Jan 22, 1889

In the case of Thompson v. Brown, Id. 628, the chancellor quotes with approval the opinion of Lord Hardwioke in Knight v. … Bowker v. Pierce, 130 Mass. 262 ; Brown v. French, 125 Mass. 410 ; Harvard College v. Amory, 9 Pick. 446 . The same latitute is allowed by the courts of New Hampshire and Vermont. French v. Currier, 47 N.

Miles, Jerry v. Amley Logistics, Inc.

2018 TN WC 122 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Aug 8, 2018

Code Ann. § 50- 6-239(d)(l) (2017); McCord v. Advantage Human Resourcing, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 6, at *7-8, 9 (Mar. 27, 2015). … The Workers’ Compensation Judge must approve the statement before the record is submitted to the Appeals Board.

Bickford v. State

25 N.E.3d 1275 · Indiana Tax Court · Feb 13, 2015

Lovejoy”), a veterinarian from the State Board of Animal Health, and members of a local rescue organization, Horse Rescue South (“HRS”), went back to Bickford’s home. … Reinbold v. State, 555 N.E.2d 463, 471 (Ind.1990), overruled on other grounds by Wright v. State, 658 N.E.2d 563 (Ind.1995).

Opinion No. (1997)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · May 5, 1997

Dear Senator Brown, ¶ 0 This office has received your request for an Attorney General Opinion. … Under the Act, facilities with large concentrations of livestock are required to obtain a license from the State Board of Agriculture ("the Board"). 2 O.S. Supp. 1996, § 9-208[ 2-9-208 ] (A).

Jackson v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr.

2025 Ohio 5504 · Ohio Court of Claims · Nov 21, 2025

Brown, 2014- Ohio-1810, at ¶ 16. … Brown v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr., 2014-Ohio-1810, ¶ 28 (10th Dist.).

STATE v. MCCLURE

2004 NCBC 8 · North Carolina Business Court · Dec 4, 2004

STATE V. … v.

Grobluskey v. Crossmark Holdings, Inc.

North Carolina Industrial Commission · Dec 6, 2011

Stat. § 9 7-2(6); Brown v. Family Dollar Distrib. Ctr. , 129 N.C. App. 361 , 364 , 499 S.E.2d 197 , 199 (1998). 5. … Stat. § 97-2 (6); Brown v. Family Dollar Distrib. Ctr. , 129 N.C. App. 361 , 364 , 499 S.E.2d 197 , 199 (1998). 6.

Carpenter v. Southern Transit

2018 TN WC App. 10 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Mar 1, 2018

In Black v. … Rather, Southern Transit’s trucks were initially “on a rotation board” and would only produce income when the trucks went out. Southern Transit “ran off the board” until approximately two years ago when Mr.