Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
0.47s
Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Jun 5, 2001
See e.g., generally, Kellems v. … Brown, 163 Conn. 478 , 313 A.2d 53 (1972) (court would presume that legislature used terms in a tax statute in light of federal income tax practice and existing regulations) and Goldberg Co. v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedCalifornia Attorney General Reports · Jul 16, 2010
BROWN JR. Attorney General DIANE E. EISENBERG Deputy Attorney General THE HONORABLE SANDRÉ R. … App. 1 , 9 (1925); see also Don v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedUntitled Texas Attorney General Opinion
Texas Attorney General Reports · Jul 2, 1940
It is stated in Brown v. City of Webster City, (Iowa 1902) 88 N. W. 1070: "Generallyspeaking,the acts of a city council can only be shown by Its records, ordin- ances, and resolutions. … In Roland v. Reading School District (Sup. Ct.
Cited 0 timesPublishedTexas Attorney General Reports · Aug 9, 1979
See Chrysler Corp. v. Brown, 47 U.S.L.W. 4434 (U.S. April 18, 1979); Skidmore v. Swift Co., 323 U.S. 134 , 137-140 (1944); Davis, Administrative Law Treatise, §§ 5.01, 5.03 (1958). … In Kee v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedUntitled Texas Attorney General Opinion
Texas Attorney General Reports · Jul 2, 1980
Brown: You request cur opinion as to whether the board of directors of an industrial revenue corporation, when Issuing revenue bonds, may set interest rates … Code S1.103: See also Weisbart & Co. v. First National Bank, 568 F. 2d 391 i;854;ir. 1978mexs.s Banking & his. Co. v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedMissouri Attorney General Reports · Oct 26, 1990
Brown Group, Inc. v. Administrative Hearing Commission, 649 S.W.2d 874 , 881 (Mo. banc 1983). The plain meaning of the statutory language is to be given effect wherever possible. State ex rel. D.M. v. … State v. Windmiller, 579 S.W.2d 730 , 732 (Mo.App. 1979). See also State ex rel. Missouri Highway and Transportation Commission v. Appelquist, 698 S.W.2d 883 , 894 (Mo.App. 1985).
Cited 0 timesPublishedMissouri Attorney General Reports · Feb 26, 1986
Moore v. Brown, 350 Mo. 256 , 267 , 165 S.W.2d 657 , 662 (banc 1942). … Board of Fund Commissioners v. Holman, 296 S.W.2d 492 , 487-488 (Mo. banc 1956). In Barnes v. Bailey, No. 67631 (Mo. Sup. Ct. 2-19-86) (may be subject to motion for rehearing) and Payne v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedLouisiana Attorney General Reports · Mar 12, 1997
John the Baptist Parish Association of Educators v. … Brown , 465 So.2d 674 (La. 1985), the Louisiana Supreme Court held that unless a proposition or question was specifically authorized by the Louisiana Constitution, statute or home rule authority that election was prohibited
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Jul 6, 2000
(c) The twenty-five percent (25%) designated to law enforcement shall be reviewed by: (1) The Advisory Board of the Criminal Justice Institute; (2) One (1) representative for the Prosecution Coordination Commission; (3) Two … Yarbrough v. Witty, 336 Ark. 479 , 987 S.W.2d 257 (1999); Lawhon Farm Servs. v. Brown, 335 Ark. 272 , 984 S.W.2d 1 (1998); Citizens To Establish A Reform Party v. Priest, 325 Ark. 257 , 926 S.W.2d 432 (1996); Henson v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedCalifornia Attorney General Reports · Aug 27, 1998
Brown Act. … (See Marek v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedUntitled California Attorney General Opinion
California Attorney General Reports · Apr 19, 2019
is also empowered to formulate regulations, which become effective upon approval by the Fresno County Board of Supervisors.27 The Board must comply with the Brown Act’s open- 18 Gov. … Brown Act); see also Bd. of Retirement of Kern County Employees’ Retirement Assn. v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedUntitled Texas Attorney General Opinion
Texas Attorney General Reports · Jul 2, 1958
.- - Honorable Lynn Brown, Administrator Texas State Board of Plumbing Examiners 904 Lavaca Austin, Texas Opinion No … Honorable Lynn Brown, page 3.
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Dec 14, 1989
SEE, e.g., BROWN ROOT, INC. v. HEMSTEAD COUNTY SAND GRAVEL, INC., 767 F.2d 464 (8th Cir. 1985). A response to the remaining questions involving the proper form of the agreement is therefore unnecessary. … SEE, e.g., CITY OF HARRISON v. BOONE COUNTY, 238 Ark. 113 , 378 S.W.2d 665 (1964).
Cited 0 timesPublishedUntitled Texas Attorney General Opinion
Texas Attorney General Reports · Jul 2, 1972
Faulk v. City of Tyler, 389 S.W.Zd 706 (Tex.Civ. App. 1965, error ref. n.r.e.). … City of Austin v. Clendennen, 323 S.W.2d 158 (Tex.Civ.App. 1959, error ref. n.r.e.).
Cited 0 timesPublishedUntitled California Attorney General Opinion
California Attorney General Reports · Jan 9, 1990
(Select Base Materials v. Board of Equal. (1959) 51 Cal.2d 640, 645.) … Davis v. City of Berkeley (1988) 47 Cal.3d 512, 516–517.)
Cited 0 timesPublishedUntitled California Attorney General Opinion
California Attorney General Reports · Feb 7, 2020
(“the Board”) alleging that the City failed to consult in good faith with it before placing Measure D on the ballot in violation of the Meyers-Milias-Brown Act (“MMBA”).5 3 https://www.cityofpaloalto.org/civicax … Black v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedMissouri Attorney General Reports · Dec 30, 1991
of education may exempt a school district from this provision if the state board of education determines that circumstances warrant such exemption. … Brown Group, Inc. v. Administrative Hearing Commission, 649 S.W.2d 874 , 881 (Mo. banc 1983).
Cited 0 timesPublishedCalifornia Attorney General Reports · Jul 16, 1998
(See Kenneally v. Medical Board (1994) 27 Cal.App.4th 489 , 495 ; Sagaser v. McCarthy (1986) 176 Cal.App.3d 288 , 305 .) … (See Weber v. City Council of Thousand Oaks (1973) 9 Cal.3d 950 , 958 ; Kenneally v. Medical Board , supra , 27 Cal.App.4th at 495 -496 ; Horeczko v. State Board of Registration (1991) 232 Cal.App.3d 1352 , 1359 .)
Cited 0 timesPublishedUntitled Texas Attorney General Opinion
Texas Attorney General Reports · Jul 2, 1959
Nelson Brown Opinion No. … V, Geppert
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Sep 18, 2003
Ass'n. v. … Brown v. Brown, 96 Ark. 456 , 132 S.W. 220 (1910). When the evidence as to the nature and extent of an agent's authority is in conflict, it is a question of fact for the fact-finder. Southland Mobile Home Corp. v.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna