Opinion

Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

Court
Texas Attorney General Reports
Filed
Jul 2, 1972
Status
Published
On the bench
Crawford Martin
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 3.5%

The opinion

Honorable David P. Bell Opinion No. M-1059

Executive Director

Texas Industrial Accident Board Re: Whether the City of Bryan

State Finance Building falls under the jurisdiction

Austin, Texas 78711 .of the Industrial Accident

Board when it has elected by

its code to become self-

insured and attempted to pro-

vide workmen's compensation

benefits outside the Board's

Dear Mr. Bell: operation.

The City of Bryan contends that the Texas Industrial

Accident Board does not have jurisdiction over industrial injuries

to employees of the City. The City's workmen's compensation code,

in Section 1, provides that the City is not entitled to avail

itself of the general provisions of the Workmen's Compensation Act

of the State. We do not have any information concerning when this

section was enacted by the City. You have asked our opinion whether

under the existing law the City falls within the jurisdiction of

the Industrial Accident Board under the above facts.

In 1952 Article III, Section 61, of our Texas Consti-

tution was adopted; it authorized the Legislature to enact laws

providing workmen's compensation insurance for municipal employees.*

*Article III, Section 60, of the Constitution of Texas, which was

adopted on November 6, 1962, provides:

"Sec. 60. The Legislature shall have the

power to pass such laws as may be necessary to

enable all counties and other political subdivisions

of this State to provide Workman's Compensation

Insurance, including the right to provide its own

insurance risk, for all employees of the county or

political subdivision as in its judgment is necessary

or required: and the Legislature shall provide suit-

able laws for the administration of such insurance

-5169-

Hon. David P. Bell, page 2 (M-1059)

Thereafter, Article 8309e-2, Vernon's Civil Statutes,

concerning workmen's compensation insurance for municipal em-

ployees was enacted by the Legislature. Section 1 of this

Article reads as follows:

"Section 1. By virtue of the provision of

Section 61, Article III, Constitution of the State

of Texas, granting the Legislature power to pass

such laws as may be necessary to enable all cities,

towns, and villages of this state to provide for

workmen's compensation insurance, including the

right to provide its own insurance risk, for all

city, town and village employees as in its judg-

ment is necessary or required, and to provide for

the administration of such insurance in the cities,

towns, and villages, of this state, and to pro-

vide for the payment of all costs, charges, and

premiums on such policies of insurance and the

benefits to be paid thereunder, provision is made

as hereinafter set forth."

Article 8309e-2, in Section 2, defines a "city" to mean

any duly and legally incorporated city in the State of Texas and

defines "Board" to mean the Industrial Accident Board of the State

of Texas. The procedure for the payment of workmen's compensation

benefits to city employees is set out in the statute and Section

7 provides that all questions arising under the Act shall be

determined by the Board.

A municipality is a political subdivision of the State

in the counties or political subdivisions of this

State and for the payment of the costs, charges

and premiums on such policies of insurance and the

benefits to be paid thereunder." (Emphasis added.)

Article III, Section 60, was amended by the inclusion in that

Section of employees of all "political subdivisions" in the pre-

vious language that related to only county employees. (See

Comment -- 1962 Amendment under Article III, Section 60, Consti-

tution of Texas.)

-5170-

Hon. David P. Bell, page 3 (M-1059)

and its incorporation embraces nothing more than the creation of

a governmental agency which becomes invested with such powers as

the law confers. Faulk v. City of Tyler, 389 S.W.Zd 706 (Tex.Civ.

App. 1965, error ref. n.r.e.).

Article XI, Section 5, of the Texas Constitution express-

ly provides that no city charter or ordinance shall contain any

provision inconsistent with the State Constitution or general

laws enacted by the Legislature. A home rule city cannot enact

rules and regulations contrary to the Constitution and the general

laws of the State. City of Austin v. Clendennen, 323 S.W.2d 158

(Tex.Civ.App. 1959, error ref. n.r.e.). In this case the court

expressly held that the City of Austin was a self-insurer under

the provisions of Article 8309e, Vernon's Civil Statutes.

Neither the charter nor an ordinance of a city can

legally contain anything inconsistent with the general laws en-

acted by the Legislature. Janus Films, Inc. v. City of Fort

Worth, 354 S.W.2d 597 (Tex.Civ.App. 1962), application for writ

of error ref. n.r.e. in 358 S.W.2d 589 (Tex.Sup. 1962).

It is our opinion that the Texas Industrial Accident

Board has jurisdiction over industrial injuries to employees of

the City of Bryan.

SUMMARY

By virtue of Article 8309e-2, Vernon's Civil

Statutes, the Texas Industrial Accident Board has

jurisdiction over industrial injuries to employees

of the City of Bryan.

V truly yoprs,

ey General of Texas

Prepared by Jack Sparks

Assistant Attorney General

-5171-

. .

Hon. David P. Bell, page 4 (M-1059)

APPROVED:

OPINION COMMITTEE

Kerns Taylor, Chairman

W. E. Allen, Co-Chairman

Fisher Tyler

Melvin Corley

Scott Garrison

Glenn Brown

SAM MCDANIEL

Staff Legal Assistant

ALFRED WALKER

Executive Assistant

NOLA WHITE

First Assistant

-5172-

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.