Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
0.94s
Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Mar 20, 2000
In Boston v. … See Yarbrough v. Witty, 336 Ark. 479 , 484 , 987 S.W.2d 257(1999); Lawhon Farm Servs. v. Brown, 335 Ark. 272 , 948 S.W.2d 1 (1998); Citizens To Establish A Reform Party v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedUntitled California Attorney General Opinion
California Attorney General Reports · Feb 5, 1992
Board of Supervisors (1981) 122 Cal.App.3d 813, 823-825; Sacramento Newspaper Guild v. … (See Krausen v. Solano County Junior College Dist. (1974) 42 Cal.App.3d 394, 404; Lucas v. Board of Trustees (1971) 18 Cal.App.3d 988, 991; Cozzolino v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedUntitled Texas Attorney General Opinion
Texas Attorney General Reports · Jul 2, 1960
Catron v, Brown,- 350-MO: 864, 171 SOW.266-1 ; 16 AmDJur.# Elections, B 166. In other stateus the manner of determining the arrangement of party columns 1s usually prescrlbed,by at&tutc. … V, Crppert, Chairman W. Ray Scrugga Wallace Flnfrock Howard Maya Leon F. Peaek REVIEWED FOR TRE ATTORNEY GENERAL BY: Leonard Passmore
Cited 0 timesPublishedLouisiana Attorney General Reports · Nov 7, 2002
Resolution of the Board of Commissioners of Terrebonne Parish Consolidated Waterworks District No. 1 of October 7, 2002; 2. Letter dated March 28, 2002, from Robert J. … Prejeant to John Brown, attorney for the original contractor; and 3.
Cited 0 timesPublishedLouisiana Attorney General Reports · Feb 14, 2011
Austin: You have requested an opinion from this Office related to the ownership of certain dedicated streets within the geographical jurisdiction of the Sewerage Water Board of New Orleans ("the Board"). … See also Brown v. Wood , 451 So.2d 569 (La. App. 2 Cir. 1984) (the nonuse of the property by its owner cannot amount to acquisitive prescription in favor of another party not actually in possession). 9 La.C.C.
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Mar 17, 2000
A Morrilton Councilman, Perry Brown, has stated that he feels that we should set officers by a specific ordinance, the number of officers even if we are arbitrarily high. … Compare A.C.A. § 14-51-304 (Repl 1998) (stating, with regard to cities having a civil service system, that "[t]he city council or board shall from time to time fix the number of employees and the salaries. . . .")
Cited 0 timesPublishedCalifornia Attorney General Reports · Nov 30, 2010
BROWN JR. Attorney General TAYLOR S. CAREY Deputy Attorney General THE HONORABLE ALAN LOWENTHAL, MEMBER OF THE STATE SENATE, has requested an opinion on the following questions: 1. … Chapman v. Rapsey , 16 Cal. 2d 636 , 642 (1940); People ex rel. Deputy Sheriffs' Assn . v. Co. of Santa Clara , 49 Cal. App. 4th 1471 , 1481 (1996); 81 Ops.Cal.Atty.Gen. 344 , 345 (1998). 2 2005 Cal.
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Apr 14, 1997
See generally Page v. Highway 10, Water Pipe Line Improv. Dist. … See, e.g., Brown v. City of Stuttgart, 312 Ark. 97 , 847 S.W.2d 710 (1993); Op. Att'y Gen. 94-030 .
Cited 0 timesPublishedFlorida Attorney General Reports · Jul 26, 1984
v. … Fla., 1978); Bernhardt v. State, 288 So.2d 490 (Fla. 1974); State ex rel. Roberts v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedKansas Attorney General Reports · Aug 13, 2003
Stout, 267 Kan. 234 , 238 (1999), quoting Lambeth v. Levens, 237 Kan. 614 , 621 (1985). 13 Lambert v. U.S.D. No. 237, Smith County , 204 Kan. 381 , 383 (1969). 14 State ex rel. Beck v. … No. 4, Brown County , 169 Kan. 351 (1950) (notice did not state that the building was to be moved). 20 Henson , 150 Kan. at 612 . 21 City of Chanute v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedLouisiana Attorney General Reports · Jun 6, 2000
unexpired term of Sheriff, Tensas Parish, on December 17, 1999.] • Recall Petition to the governor for the purpose of recalling Rickey Aaron Jones, Sheriff, Parish of Tensas, designating Bryan Mack Miles, Chairman and Arlone Brown … Bradford v. Board of Supervisors of Elections , 128 So.2d 468 (La.App. 3 Cir. 1961). This statutory language followed the Supreme Court's decision in Ponds v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedCalifornia Attorney General Reports · Dec 31, 2010
BROWN JR. Attorney General DANIEL G. … Chapman v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedFlorida Attorney General Reports · Apr 9, 1982
See Board of Commissioners v. Board of Pilot Commissioners, 42 So. 697 (Fla. 1906); Brown v. Winton, 197 So. 543 (Fla. 1940); AGO's 080-93, 071-28. … Harris v. Wiecking, 61 So. 125 (Fla. 1913) and State ex rel . Davis v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedCalifornia Attorney General Reports · Oct 24, 2001
As the Court of Appeal noted in Board of Trustees v. … (See, e.g., Allen v. Payne (1934) 1 Cal.2d 607 , 608-609 [no power to hire investigator]; Board of Trustees v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedColorado Attorney General Reports · Apr 2, 1984
Catron v. Board of County Commissioners , 18 Colo. 553 , 33 P. 513 (1893); In re Breene , supra . … People v. Brown , supra , 485 P.2d at 524 ; In Re Amendments of Legislative Bills , supra , 19 Colo. at 359 .
Cited 0 timesPublishedFlorida Attorney General Reports · Dec 19, 1984
See, Board of Commissioners v. Board of Pilot Commissioners, 42 So. 697 (Fla. 1906); Brown v. Winton, 197 So. 543 (Fla. 1940); AGO's 82-83, 80-93, 71-28. … In Brumby v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedCalifornia Attorney General Reports · Mar 8, 2007
BROWN JR. Attorney General GREGORY L. … Thus, in People v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedCalifornia Attorney General Reports · Oct 18, 2007
BROWN JR. Attorney General MARC J. … (a); Fenton v. Board of Directors (1984) 156 Cal.App.3d 1107 , 1113-1114 ; 79 Ops.Cal.Atty.Gen. 21 , 25-26 (1990).)
Cited 0 timesPublishedCalifornia Attorney General Reports · Jul 18, 2007
BROWN JR. Attorney General DANIEL G. … (See, e.g., Ventura County Deputy Sheriffs' Assn. v. Board of Retirement (1977) 16 Cal.4th 483 , 490 ; Hittle v. Santa Barbara County Employees' Retirement Assn. (1985) 39 Cal.3d 374 , 390 .)
Cited 0 timesPublishedTexas Attorney General Reports · Nov 14, 1984
See Parker v. Brown, 425 S.W.2d 379 , 381 (Tex.Civ.App.-Tyler 1968, no writ) (question of residence is to be judicially determined); see also Mills v. … See Brown v. Patterson, supra. By construing article 1.05 in favor of the residency of the applicant, the statutory purpose will not be frustrated.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna