Opinion

Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

Court
Texas Attorney General Reports
Filed
Jul 2, 1951
Status
Published
On the bench
Price Daniel
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 3.5%

The opinion

Hon. Paul H. Brown

Fire Insurance Commissioner

Board of Insurance Commissioners

Austin, Texas

Opinion NO. v-1336.

Re: Constitutionalityof a rider

in the general appropriation

bill prescribing the method

of handling expense money

collected pursuant to Art.

Dear Sir: 4898, V.C.S.

You have requested an opinion of this of-

fice regarding the constitutionalityof the following

rider in the general appropriationbill for the bien-

nium ending August 31, 1953:

“Provided also that such sums as are

received by the Fire Division as provided

by Article 4898 R.C.S. shall be deposited

to the DepartmentalSuspense Account in

the State Treasury. Expenses of State Bm-’

ployees incident to the investigations

shall be paid from travel expenses herein-

above appropriatedand such travel expense

appropriationshall be reimbursed for the

actual amounts ex ended under the provi-

sions of Article t898 R.C.S.-by a transfer

from the amount on deposit in the Depart-

mental Suspense Account.‘I (H.B. 426 Acts

R.S. 1951, ch. 499, p. 1238, at

Your first question is as follows:

“Is this ri’dervoid and of no effect

by virtue of Section 35, Article 3 of the

Constitutionby reason of the fact that

the subject matter thereof is not quoted

in the caption of H.B. No. 4261 (Refer-

ence Attorney General’s opinion v-1254,

dated August 25, 1951, and cases cited.)”

Hon. Paul H. Brown, page 2 (~-1.336)

The general rule as to captions is stated

an Antonio and A. P. RY. v. Statq 128 Tex. 33,

;? z.W.2.d680, 688 (1936), as followsl

II The generality of the title

.. .

is no objection to it so long as it is

not made a cover to legislationwhich by

no fair intendment can be considered as

having a necessary or proper connection.

Jo v. City of Terre11 (Tex.Civ.App,)

13g S.W. 213, 215; city of Aransas Pass

v. Keeling, Atty. Gen., 112 Tex. 339,

247 s.w. 818.

"'It would be burdensome if not in-

tolerable to require that the title

should be as full as the act itself. The

word "title" implies that no such require-

ment exists. The purpose of the constitu-

tion-1 provision is merely to reasonably

apprise the legislatorsof the contents

of tne bill, to the end that surprise and

fraud in legislationmay be prevented.'

Doeppenschmidtv. I. & G. N. R.R. Co.,

100 Tex. 532, 101 S.W. 1080, 1~181.~~

Thus, so long as the title gives notice of

the contents of the body of the act, there is no evil

in generality. However, when the caption provisions

are narrow and restrictive,portions of the act broad-

er than the caption are unconstitutional. Att'y Gen.

Op. V-1253 (1951).

We are of the opinion that the rider in

question properly falls under the following portion

of the caption to the general appropriationact: "An

Act . . . prescribingcertain specific procedures,

rules, regulations,restrictionsand limitations re-

lating to and governing the expendituresof appropria-

tions made herein . . .I1 The rider acl;;pr+aEe;thgor

funds collected by virtue of Article

certain designateduses and sets up the piocGd&g'for

utilizing the appropriation. The title provision is

general in form, but it gives sufficientnotice of

what is attempted by the riderj hence there is no vio-

lation of Article III, Section 35 of the Texas Consti-

tution.

Hon. Paul H. Brown, page 3 (v-1336)

The remainder of your questions,deal with

the means of utilizing the required deposit, and

the answers depend on a determinationof whether this

rider attempts to incorporategeneral legislation

within an appropriationbill or to altar, amend, or

repeal a general statute. If the rider does make

it is unconstitutional. Att'y Gen.

:;:hvz2;Y3;i). If not, the rider provisions must

be followed.

Pour questions are as follows:

"1s the rider invalid, illegal and in-

effective by reason of the fact that it at-

tempts to or does, in a general appropria-

tion bill repeal, modify, or amend an

existing iaw, to wit: Article 48981

"Does the rider effectuallyrequire an

insurance company requesting an investiga-

tion of a fire and the State Insurance Com-

mission to deposit in the State Treasury

the funds evidencing the expenses of the

State Fire Marshall or other suitable person

to act for him, which funds are for expenses

as provided in Article 48981

"Are such funds, as provided in Article

4898 as expenses for the State Fire Marshal

or other suitable person designated to act

for him under the General Statute Article

4898, such funds as become subject to legis-

lative control or regulationby rider direc-

tion to an appropriationbill?"

Article 4898, V.C.S., provides:

"If for any reason the State.Pire.Mar-

shall is unable to make any required investi-

gation in person, he may designate the fire

marshal of such city or town or some other

suitable person to act for him; and such per-

son so designated shall have the same author-

ity as is herein given the State Fire Mar-

shal with reference to the particular matter

to be investigatedby him, and shall receive

such compensationfor his services as the

State Insurance Commission may allow. If the

Hon. Paul H. Brown, page 4 (v-1336)

investigationof a fire is made at the

request of an insurance company, or at

the request of a policyholder sustain-

ing loss, or at the request.of the mayor,

town clerk or chief of the fire depart-

ment of any city, village or town in

which the fire occurred, then the expenses

of the Fire Marshal, clerical expenses,

witnesses and officers fees incident and

necessary to such investigationshall be

paid by such insurance company, or such

policyholderof such city or town as the

case may be, otherwise the expenses of

such investigationare to be paid as part

of the expenses of the State Insurance

Commission. The party or parties, company

or companies, requesting such investiga-

tion, shall before such investigationis

commenced deposit with the State Insur-

ance Commission,an Amount of money in

the judgment of sdid Commission sufficient

to defray the expenses of said Fire Mar-

shal in conducting such investigation.”

The money that is required to be deposited

does not at the time of deposit become the property

of the State, since at that time its status is unde-

termined. Only that portion of the deposit equal to

the actual expenses of the investigatorwill become

State property, and the remainder, if any, continues

to be the property of the person or firm requestlng

the investigation. The Legislature has, by general

statute (Art. 4388, V.C.S.) provided for the hand-

ling of funds “the status oh which is undetermined,l*

as follows:

“The State Treasurer shall receive

daily from the head of each Department

each of whom is specificallycharged w$th

the duty of making same daily, a detailed

list of all persons remitting money the

status of which is undetermined or which

is awaiting the time when it can finally

be taken into the Treasury, together with

the actual remittanceswhich the Treasurer

shall cash and place in his vaults or in

legally authorized depository banks, if

the necessity arises. The report from the

Hon. Paul H. Brown, page 5 (~4336)

General Land Office shall include all

money for interest, principal

. and

leases of school, university, asylum

and other lands. A deposit receipt

shall be issued by the Comptrollerfor

the daily total of such remittances

from each Department; and the cashier

of the Treasurer’sDepartment shall

keep a cash book1 to be called Isus-

pense cash book, in which to enter

these deposit receipts, and any others

issued for cash received for which no

deposit warrants can be issued or when

their issuance is delayed. As soon as

the status of money so placed with the

Treasurer on a deposit receipt is de-

termined, it shall be transferredfrom

the suspense account by placing the por-

tion of it belonging to the State in

the Treasury by the issuance of a depos-

it warrant, and the part found not to

belong to the State shall be refunded.

When deposit warrants are issued, they

shall be entered in this cash book, as

well as any refunds, and the balance

shall represent the aggregate of the

items still in suspense. Refunds shall

be made in a manner similar to that in

present use, except that separate ser-

ies of warrants shall be used for mak-

ing such refunds, to be called ‘refund

warrants,1 and such warrants shall be

written and signed by the Comptroller

and counter-signedby the ,Treasurerand

charged against the suspense funds to’

which they apply. Such warrants shall

then’be returned to the Comptroller and

delivered by him to the person entitled

to receive them.”

By the

A,.. . terms of the above

_. Article,

. when the

status or tne aepositea money is aeterminea,--inyour

case, when the investigator% expense account is ap-

proved,--theTreasurer will transfer by warrant an

amount equal to the total of the expense account to the

Fire Insurance DivisionlsTravel Expense Account, from

which a warrant may be issued to the investigator,and

by a refund warrant return the remainder, if any, to

Hon. Paul H. Brown, page 6 (v-1336)

the person or firm requesting the investigation.

Q&Die1 v. Richcrq& 118 S.W.2d 935 (Tex. Civ. App.

1938), and Att'y Gen. Op. O-945 (1940).

The rider in question does not attempt to

alter, amend, or repeal any general statute. The

provision requiring the money to be deposited to the

Department Suspense Account is in compliancewith

Article 4388, V.C.S. This portion of tk rider mere-

ly reiterates the general statute and has no other

legal effect. Att'y Gen. Op. C-1837 (1940). The ap-

propriation in the rider is for the purposes set out

by Article 4898, V.C.S. and as such is proper and

valid. Att'y Gen. Op. f-1267 (1951). Therefore, you

are advised that the method of operation provided by

Article 4388, V.C.S., and the rider to the general

appropriationbill is the proper method of handling

and accounting for the funds in question.

The title to the general appropriation

bill for the biennium ending August 31, 1953,

is sufficientlybroad and general to include

the rider (H.B. 426 Acts 52nd Leg. R.S.

1951 ch. 499 pe 1328 at p* 1373)'regulat-

ing $he dispo&tion of'funds deposited with

the Board of Insurance Commissionersto de-

fray the anticipated expenses of a fire in-

vestigator.

The rider does not attempt to alter,

amend or repeal a general statute

ly reiterates the requirementsof k?"4$%~-

V.C.S., a general statute prescribingthe

method for handling funds "the status of which

is undetermined.n

Yours very truly,

APPROVED: PRICE DANIEL

Attorney General

C. K. Richards

Trial & Appellate Division

Jesse P. Luton, Jr. ,,rw~d~

Reviewing Assistant E. Wa Thode

Assistant

Charles D. Mathews

First Assistant

EW.:wb

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.