Case law

Opinion Number

Louisiana Attorney General Reports · Jan 25, 2001

Fire and police civil service boards A. … Finally, you ask if there are members of the Board who are ineligible, what steps are to be taken. In accordance with Lehmann v.

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports · Oct 29, 1982

CITY'S MINIMUM HOUSING AND COMMERCIAL PROPERTY APPEALS BOARD, CREATED BY CITY ORDINANCE, MAY BE COMBINED SO THAT THE CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD MAY PERFORM THE FUNCTIONS OF BOTH BOARDS. … See , State v. Florida State Turnpike Authority, 80 So.2d 337 (Fla. 1955); State v. Gordon, 189 So. 437 (Fla. 1939); Amos v. Mathews, 126 So. 308 (Fla. 1930); AGO's 081-72, 080-97, 080-12.

Opinion Number

Louisiana Attorney General Reports · Mar 21, 1997

light of Dagenhardt v. … The parish and city school boards may grant additional sick leave, without loss of pay, or with such reduction of pay as they may establish and fix. In Dagenhardt v.

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports · Jun 27, 1996

Under similar circumstances, the Supreme Court of Florida, in State v. … Stat. 10 See, State v. Miami Beach Redevelopment Agency, 392 So.2d 875 (Fla. 1980). 11 650 So.2d 14 (Fla. 1995). 12 Section 288.9602 , et seq., Fla. Stat. 13 650 So.2d at 19 , citing State v.

Opn. No.

New York Attorney General Reports · Apr 14, 1980

therein; one of the town board members voted against the resolution and the other town board members voted for it. … In a like situation to that which you describe, it was held in Brechner v Inc.

Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

Texas Attorney General Reports · Jul 2, 1964

Based upon such petition the "further procedure" aumorized by the State Board of Education is the ordering of an election by the CommissionersCourt. … V. Geppert, Chairman Ed Boldlng Jerry Brock Edward Moffett Milton Richardson APPROVED FOR THE ATTORNEY GENERAL BY: Stanton Stone -1323-

Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

Texas Attorney General Reports · Jul 2, 1958

to the Board its ability to make such disposition under the ruled and regulations set up by the Board, as provided for herein...." … V. Geppert

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports · Jul 19, 1974

Accord: State v. … It was there held that the board could not lawfully delegate to its chief supervisor the power to adopt rules and regulations for the conduct of the hearings of the board. Accord: Blitch v.

Opinion Number

Louisiana Attorney General Reports · Aug 20, 1999

In Lentini v. … In Lamkin v.

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Feb 4, 1991

Legislative Research Commission v. Brown, 664 S.W.2d 907 (Ky. 1984), (construing language identical to Art. 4, §§ 1 and 2). … Beck v. Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission, 160 Fla. 1 , 133 So.2d 594 , (1948) and State ex el. Public Utilities Commission of Ohio v. Controlling Board of Ohio, 130 Ohio St. 127 , 197 N.E. 129 (1935).

Informal Opinion No.

New York Attorney General Reports · Sep 28, 1987

It is contrary to public policy for an appointing board to appoint one of its members to a position ( Wood v Town of Whitehall, 120 Misc. 124 [Sup Ct, Washington Co, 1923], affd 206 App. Div. 786 [3d Dept, 1923]). … the appointment of a former board member to a position ( ibid .).

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Oct 2, 1991

. 2 See Charles Johnson, County Judge, et al. v. … Unlike advisory boards, administrative boards may exercise administrative powers granted by county ordinance. A.C.A. § 14-14-705 . Administrative board members must be appointed by the county judge.

Opinion No. Oag 15-87, (1987)

76 Op. Att'y Gen. 60 · Wisconsin Attorney General Reports · Mar 31, 1987

In Town of Sun Prairie v. … Unless county board approval is obtained pursuant to section 60.62 (3), section 61.34 (1) therefore cannot be construed to permit a town with village powers to engage in the process of zoning. In Beck v.

Opinion No. (2007)

California Attorney General Reports · Feb 15, 2007

BROWN JR. Attorney General GREGORY L. GONOT Deputy Attorney General THE HONORABLE NOREEN EVANS, MEMBER OF THE STATE ASSEMBLY, has requested an opinion on the following questions: 1. … (See City of Inglewood-Los Angeles County Civic Center Authority v. Superior Court (1972) 7 Cal.3d 861 , 866 ; Taylor Bus Service, Inc. v. San Diego Board of Education (1987) 195 Cal.App.3d 1331 , 1341-1342 .)

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Jun 2, 1992

Does the County Board have any discretion or option to make a decision, or is the County Board absolutely required to grant the petition, regardless of condition? 2. … Love v. Hill, 297 Ark. 96 , 759 S.W.2d 550 (1988); Stone v. State, 254 Ark. 1011 , 498 S.W.2d 634 (1973).

Opinion No. (1980)

Nebraska Attorney General Reports · Jun 26, 1980

While administrative boards generally operate under authority granted them by the Legislature, a long standing custom or practice may rise to the level of compulsory rules. See Adickes v. E. H. … Constitutional Law § 489 (1955); Accord, Gregory v. Barr, 203 F.2d 364 (1953). (The discriminatory application of a statute which is on its face nondiscriminatory is unlawful.)

Attorney General Opinion No.

Kansas Attorney General Reports · Jan 29, 1993

board or any three members thereof. . . . … McGraw v. Marion County Planning Commission , 174 N.E.2d 757 , 760 (1961).

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports · Feb 5, 2002

e.g., School Bd. of Collier County v. … Ass'n , 559 So.2d 1197 , 1198 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990); Sulcer v. McFatter, 497 So.2d 1349 , 1350 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986) (school board has full governmental authority). 3 Id . 4 Cf., City of Miami v.

Opinion Number

Louisiana Attorney General Reports · Jul 2, 2003

See City of Port Allen v. La. Risk Management, et al. , 439 So.2d 399 (La. 1983). … See discussions in United States v. American Library Association , 2003 WL 21433656 , ___ S.Ct. ___ (June 23, 2003); Cornelius v.

Attorney General Opinion No.

Kansas Attorney General Reports · Oct 15, 2007

Attorney General Opinion No. 99-43 (resolution expressing concern for the safety of the city's water resources); International Ass'n of Firefighters v. … It would seem that local officials in a particular gaming zone would be uniquely qualified to testify on these issues. 33 State v.