Case law

Opinion Number

Louisiana Attorney General Reports · Nov 9, 1993

In Connecticut Board of Pardons v. Dumschat, 452 U.S. 458 , 101 S.Ct. 2460 (1981), the United States Supreme Court interpreted a similar Connecticut statute concerning pardons. … Von Scheppf v. Louisiana Board of Pardons, 536 So.2d 528 (La.App. 1 Cir. 1988). Likewise, Louisiana statutes do not grant inmates a right to make unlimited pardon applications.

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Apr 14, 1997

By means of this document, the State Board would relinquish all claim to the property and would transfer all such claim to the College. Smith v. Olin Industries, 224 Ark. 606 , 275 S.W.2d 439 (1955). … See Little Rock Chamber of Commerce v. Pulaski County, 113 Ark. 439 , 168 S.W. 848 (1914); Ops. Att'y Gen. Nos. 94-168 ; 93-070; 92-022.

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports · Nov 5, 1993

Accord, Spillis Candela Partners, Inc. v. Centrust Savings Bank, 535 So.2d 694 (3 D.C.A. Fla., 1988). 2 Board of Public Instruction of Broward County v. … Doran, 224 So.2d 693 (Fla. 1969). 3 See, Board of Public Instruction of Broward County v. Doran, supra; Canney v. Board of Public Instruction of Alachua County, 278 So.2d 260 (Fla. 1973).

Opinion No. (1983)

Nebraska Attorney General Reports · May 9, 1983

We will answer your questions concerning the general character of the board before proceeding to your further questions with respect to LB 59. The Nebraska Supreme Court in Anderson v. … In this respect, the board acts as an entity in that the majority vote of the board determines what action the board will order with respect to tax rates. That entity concept, however, extends only to the final result.

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Jun 8, 1990

If they have not been legally appointed, are the contracts which have been entered into by the county board legal because of defacto status of the board members? … See, generally, Pierce v. Edington, 38 Ark. 150 (1981); Appleby v. Belden Corp., supra. The foregoing opinion, which I hereby approve, was prepared by Assistant Attorney General Elisabeth A. Walker.

Opinion Number

Louisiana Attorney General Reports · Sep 5, 1996

R.S. 33:4727 states that the local legislative body may provide for the appointment of a board of adjustment. However, in Coogan v. … We also find it pertinent to recognize in Lafourche Parish Council v.

Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

Texas Attorney General Reports · Jul 2, 1987

You suggest that JM-670 is in conflict with a recent Texas Supreme Court opinion, Central Education Agency,of Texas et al v. Upshur County Commissioners Court et al, 30 ,Tex. Sup. Ct. … Obviously, section 19.008 does not apply to these districts nor was it relevant to the litigation involving the Union Grove I.S.D. and Gilmer 1.S.D; in Central Education Agency of Texas v.

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports · Feb 17, 1983

Reino v. State, 352 So.2d 853 (Fla. 1977); Alligood v. Florida Real Estate Commission, 156 So.2d 705 (2 D.C.A. Fla., 1963); Van Pelt v. Hilliard, 78 So. 693 (Fla. 1918). … Milazzo v. State, 377 So.2d 1161 (Fla. 1979); Tatzel v. State, 356 So.2d 787 (Fla. 1978).

Opinion Number

Louisiana Attorney General Reports · Feb 10, 2011

*Page 2 A "political subdivision" is defined by La.R.S. 13:5102 (B)(1) as including: [a]ny parish, municipality, special district, school board, sheriff, public board, institution, department, commission, district, corporation … Boyce Assistant Attorney General JDC: EAB 1 See also Kohler v. Housing Authority of New Orleans , 2000-2558 (La.App. 4 Cir. 3/6/02) , 812 So.2d 851 . 2 La. Atty. Gen. Op.

Opn. No.

New York Attorney General Reports · May 17, 1990

v Hinman, 122 Misc.2d 531 , 534 [Sup Ct, Onondaga Co, 1984]). … The decisions of local boards have been set aside based upon a judicial finding of conflicts of interests of board members participating in the decisions ( ibid.; Taxpayers' Association v Town Board, 69 A.D.2d 32 [2d Dept

Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

Texas Attorney General Reports · Jul 2, 1947

Reed McDonald - Page 2 (V-01) Article 139, Powers of Board, provides as fol- lows: “The Board shall have power: “1. … Reed McDonald - Page 4 (V-01) on donated lands.

Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

Texas Attorney General Reports · Jul 2, 1957

This article placer the burden of fact findlng upon the Board 8nd it ie for the Board to determine tihether 8 violation hen occurred. … V. Geppert .

Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

Texas Attorney General Reports · Jul 2, 1963

C- 142 Administrator Texas Liquor Control Board Re: Whether under the current Austin, Texas appropriations bill the LIquorControl Board is … V. Geppert, Chairman Linward Shivers Bradv Coleman Ben harrison Pat Bailey APPROVED FOR THE ATTORNEY GENERAL BY: Stanton Stone -697-

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports · Oct 25, 1983

Loftin v. McMillan, 45 So. 882 (Fla. 1908). See also , American Bakeries Co. v. Haines City, 180 So. 524 (Fla. 1938); State v. Gay, 29 So.2d 623 (Fla. 1947); Fidelity Gas Co. of New York v. … And see , Villery v.

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports · Oct 30, 1985

Compare, Neu v. … Herald Publishing Co., 462 So.2d 821 (Fla. 1985) (Sunshine Law applies to meetings between city council and city attorney held for purposes of discussing settlement of pending litigation to which city was party); Blackford v.

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports · Aug 6, 1986

county); Broward County v. … Holly v. Auld, 450 So.2d 217 (Fla. 1984); State v. Egan, 287 So.2d 1 (Fla. 1973); Tropical Coach Line, Inc. v. Carter, 121 So.2d 779 (Fla. 1960); Maryland Casualty Co. v. Sutherland, 169 So. 679 (Fla. 1936).

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports · Aug 21, 1981

See Bath Club, Inc. v. Dade County, 394 So.2d 110 , 112 (Fla. 1981); State v. Florida State Turnpike Authority, 80 So.2d 337 (Fla. 1955); State ex rel . Gibbs v. Gordon, 189 So. 437 (Fla. 1939); Amos v. … by a member of the enforcement board who fails to attend 2 of 3 successive meetings without cause and without prior approval of the board's chairman.

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Jun 29, 1998

Arkansas courts have long interpreted the above-quoted statutory provision as allowing school boards wide latitude in formulating the rules and policies that govern their school systems. See, e.g. , Safferstone v. … Tucker, 235 Ark. 70 , 72 , 357 S.W.2d 3 , 4 (1962); Isgrig v. Srygley, 210 Ark. 580 , 197 S.W.2d 37 (1946). See also Springdale Board of Education v.

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Apr 28, 2008

Att'y Gen. 2006-219 at n. 4, citing Thompson v. Roberts, 333 Ark. 544 , 970 S.W.2d 239 (1998) and Op. Att'y Gen. 2006-066 . … Nos. 94-446 and 94-283, citing Van Hovenberg v. Holman, 201 Ark. 370 , 44 S.W.2d 719 (1940); Madden v. United States Associates, 40 Ark. App. 143 , 844 S.W.2d 374 (1992); Acme Brick Co. v.

Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

Texas Attorney General Reports · Jul 2, 1967

M-30 Chairman, State Board of Reglstration for Profeskional Engineers Re: Construction of John Ii. … V. Geppert,~ Co-Chairman Mario Obledo John Banks Pat Bailey Houghton Brownlee John Reeves STAFF LEGALASSISTART A. J:Carubbl, Jr. - 133 - -’