Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
0.61s
Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Apr 14, 2000
other matters as the boards' membership and organization, election of board members, vacancies, and the boards' powers and duties. … Glover v. Henry, 231 Ark. 111 , 115 , 328 S.W.2d 382 (1959) (concluding that the plan under Ark.
Cited 0 timesPublishedColorado Attorney General Reports · Apr 9, 1980
See , Andrews v. Nevada State Board of Cosmetology , 467 P.2d 96 (Sup.Ct. of Nev. 1970). … Greenburg v. Florida Board of Dentistry , 297 So.2d 628 (Fla.App. 1974).
Cited 0 timesPublishedNebraska Attorney General Reports · Jan 22, 1998
First of all, in Board of Regents of the University of Nebraska v. … Spire v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Dec 23, 2003
Regulations of the Arkansas Board of Corrections, Regulation 7.9 (Meritorious Good Time), V(B) (Definitions). … See Cave City Nursing Home, Inc. v. Arkansas DHS, 351 Ark. 13 , 89 S.W.3d 884 (2002).
Cited 0 timesPublishedFlorida Attorney General Reports · Jun 17, 1976
(See Board of Public Instruction of Duval County v. City of Jacksonville, 86 So.2d 887 (Fla. 1956); City of Titusville v. Board of Public Instruction of Brevard County, 258 So.2d 836 (4 D.C.A. … See Board of Public Inst. v. Little River Val. Drain. Dist., 119 So.2d 323 (3 D.C.A. Fla., 1960); City of Coral Gables v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedNew York Attorney General Reports · Feb 17, 1999
The chairpersons of the participating counties' governing boards appoint members to the MOSA board. … Ryan v. Green , 58 N.Y. 295 (1874). In that case the Court held that two offices are incompatible if one is subordinate to the other or if there is an inherent inconsistency between the two offices.
Cited 0 timesPublishedCalifornia Attorney General Reports · Mar 20, 1997
Buckley v. … Although Buckley v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedFlorida Attorney General Reports · Jul 29, 2010
Fla. 88-36 (1988) (notice required to be given to the "violator" of a code requires notification to all owners of property owned by more than one person). 12 See Henley v. … McDonald , 971 So. 2d 998 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008), Monroe County v. Whispering Pines Associates , 697 So. 2d 873 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997), and City of Gainesville Code Enforcement Board v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedCalifornia Attorney General Reports · Jul 26, 1999
(See Hall v. City of Taft (1956) 47 Cal.2d 177 , 183 ; City of Orange v. Valenti (1974) 37 Cal.App.3d 240 , 244 ; Town of Atherton v. … Lawler v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedUntitled Texas Attorney General Opinion
Texas Attorney General Reports · Jul 2, 1939
Under the provisions of Article 4550a, supra, the State Board of Dental Examiners is authorized to employ a secretary who shall receive a salary to be fixed by the Board to aid the Board in performing the duties prescribed … Jams V.
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Oct 9, 1998
See Leathers v. Cotton, 332 Ark. 49 , 961 S.W.2d 49 (1998). Accordingly, I must conclude that the Board is required to establish and maintain only one interest-bearing account. … See, e.g. , Death and Permanent Total Disability Trust Fund v. Whirlpool Corp. , 39 Ark. App. 62 , 837 S.W.2d 293 (1992).
Cited 0 timesPublishedFlorida Attorney General Reports · Mar 2, 1978
SUMMARY: A member of the Board of Trustees of the Dade County Public Health Trust may also serve on the Board of Business Regulation, since membership on the board of trustees does not constitute a public office. … Holloway v. Sheats, 83 So. 503 (Fla. 1919); emphasis supplied.]
Cited 0 timesPublishedKansas Attorney General Reports · Jun 29, 2004
fine, unless all moneys received by the Board from the licensee accrue to the Board's fee fund, the purpose of allowing the Board to "recoup expenses" is diminished. … K.S.A. 75-2170a. 3 Jones v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedLouisiana Attorney General Reports · Oct 2, 2009
On behalf of the Assumption Parish School Board ("Board"), you have asked for our opinion on several matters related to the selection of the official journal for the Board. … Broadmoor, L.L.C. v. Ernest N. Morial New Orleans Exhibition Hall Authority , 04-0211 (La.3/18/04), 867 So.2d 651 , 656 .
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Jan 12, 2004
Additionally, according to my understanding, the Rule you have alluded to is currently the subject of an action pending in the Pulaski County Circuit Court ( Arkansas Psychology Association v. … Arkansas Board of Examiners in Psychology (No. 2003-4543)).
Cited 0 timesPublishedUntitled Texas Attorney General Opinion
Texas Attorney General Reports · Jul 2, 1950
V-1011. County Attorney Grimes county Rer Authority of County School’ Anderson, Texas Board under Art. … Art, 2922-18, V. C.S.; A. G, Opinions Was, v-855 and 856.
Cited 0 timesPublishedFlorida Attorney General Reports · Oct 11, 1984
City of Miami v. … See, Edgerton v. International Company, 89 So.2d 488 (Fla. 1956); State ex rel. Greenberg v. Florida State Board of Dentistry, 297 So.2d 628 (1 D.C.A.Fla., 1974), cert. denied, 300 So.2d 900 (Fla. 1974).
Cited 0 timesPublishedFlorida Attorney General Reports · Mar 4, 1985
The board of adjustment shall have not less than 5 nor more than 10 members. Members of the board of adjustment shall be appointed by the governing body." … See, Bath Club, Inc. v. Dade County, 394 So.2d 110 , 112 (Fla. 1981); State v. Florida State Turnpike Authority, 80 So.2d 337 (Fla. 1955); State ex rel. Gibbs v. Gordon, 189 So. 437 (Fla. 1939); Amos v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedUntitled Texas Attorney General Opinion
Texas Attorney General Reports · Jul 2, 1947
Carlos Ashley, page2 (V-42) “1, Does the Superintendentof any eleemoay- nary lastitutfon,or the Board of Control, have authority ^.. - to place for adoptioa a clrlldlawfully … eces~si%yfor the Board of Gcantrol to approve OP eonseat.
Cited 0 timesPublishedMissouri Attorney General Reports · Dec 17, 1981
In our view, the presiding judge of the county court is not a regular member of the board or an ex-officio member of the board in the normal sense under Section 162.301 .3 but is only considered a member of the board for … State v. Reid, 28 S.W. 172 (Mo.Sup. 1894). Therefore, Section 105.458 would not apply to the presiding judge in the situation you have presented.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna