Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersSAG

10,000+ results

6.67s

  • Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

    Texas Attorney General Reports · Jul 2, 1947

    V-205 Comptroller of Public Accounts Austin, Texas Re: State Available School Fund, ap- … date, V-204, copy of which is attached hereto for your information.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Ago

    Florida Attorney General Reports · Jun 17, 1976

    (See Board of Public Instruction of Duval County v. City of Jacksonville, 86 So.2d 887 (Fla. 1956); City of Titusville v. Board of Public Instruction of Brevard County, 258 So.2d 836 (4 D.C.A. … See Board of Public Inst. v. Little River Val. Drain. Dist., 119 So.2d 323 (3 D.C.A. Fla., 1960); City of Coral Gables v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No.

    Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Jul 5, 2001

    While the Planning Board may thus recommend zoning, such recommendations are not binding until adopted by the Quorum Court. Accord Rickman v. Mobbs, 253 Ark. 969 , 490 S.W.2d 129 (1973). … of the Board, as it may do pursuant to A.C.A. § 14-17-203 (f).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • 108OAG81

    Maryland Attorney General Reports · Sep 22, 2023

    Board of County Comm’rs v. Perennial Solar, LLC, 464 Md. 610, 619 (2019) (quoting Howard County v. Potomac Elec. Power Co., 319 Md. 511, 522 (1990)). … E.g., Elsberry v. Stanley Martin Cos., 482 Md. 159, 181 (2022) (quoting Building Materials Corp. of Am. v. Board of Educ., 428 Md. 572, 585 (2012)).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Ago

    Florida Attorney General Reports · May 13, 2003

    Holloway v. Sheats , 83 So. 508 , 509 (Fla. 1919). And see, State ex rel. Clyatt v. Hocker, 22 So. 721 (Fla. 1897). 3 See, State v. Florida State Turnpike Authority , 80 So.2d 337 , 338 (Fla. 1955); State ex rel. … Gibbs v. Gordon , 189 So. 437 (Fla. 1939); City of Riviera Beach v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Ago

    Florida Attorney General Reports · Sep 21, 1982

    Ervin v. Capital Weekly Post, 97 So.2d 465 (Fla. 1957); Greenleaf and Crosby Co. v. Coleman, 158 So. 421 (Fla. 1934). … Alsop v. Pierce, 19 So.2d 799 (Fla. 1944); Devin v. City of Hollywood, 351 So.2d 1022 (Fla. 1976).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion Number

    Louisiana Attorney General Reports · Nov 13, 2009

    No member of the board of aldermen shall hold any other office or employment under the municipal government while he is a member of the board . . . … V. The incompatibility provisions of La.R.S. 42:64 should always be reviewed for applicability. La.R.S. 42:64 sets forth certain combinations of offices and employments which are deemed to be incompatible.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1999)

    California Attorney General Reports · Jul 26, 1999

    (See Hall v. City of Taft (1956) 47 Cal.2d 177 , 183 ; City of Orange v. Valenti (1974) 37 Cal.App.3d 240 , 244 ; Town of Atherton v. … Lawler v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

    Texas Attorney General Reports · Jul 2, 1939

    Under the provisions of Article 4550a, supra, the State Board of Dental Examiners is authorized to employ a secretary who shall receive a salary to be fixed by the Board to aid the Board in performing the duties prescribed … Jams V.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No.

    Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Oct 9, 1998

    See Leathers v. Cotton, 332 Ark. 49 , 961 S.W.2d 49 (1998). Accordingly, I must conclude that the Board is required to establish and maintain only one interest-bearing account. … See, e.g. , Death and Permanent Total Disability Trust Fund v. Whirlpool Corp. , 39 Ark. App. 62 , 837 S.W.2d 293 (1992).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

    Texas Attorney General Reports · Jul 2, 1958

    The provision, quoted above on the Motor Pool, authorizes the Board to maintain and operate a Motor Pool to serve the institutions under its supervision and authorizes the Board to establish rules and regulations as in its … V. Geppert.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Informal Opinion No.

    New York Attorney General Reports · Sep 26, 1989

    v Hinman, 122 Misc.2d 531 , 534 [Sup Ct, Onondaga Co, 1984]). … The decisions of local boards have been set aside based upon a judicial finding of conflicts of interests of board members participating in the decisions ( ibid .; Taxpayers' Association v Town Board, 69 A.D.2d 320 [2d Dept

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Attorney General Opinion No.

    Kansas Attorney General Reports · Jun 29, 2004

    fine, unless all moneys received by the Board from the licensee accrue to the Board's fee fund, the purpose of allowing the Board to "recoup expenses" is diminished. … K.S.A. 75-2170a. 3 Jones v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1998)

    California Attorney General Reports · Mar 5, 1998

    (See Walters v. Weed (1988) 45 Cal.3d 1 , 7 ; Smith v. Smith (1955) 45 Cal.2d 235 , 239 ; DeMiglio v. Mashore (1992) 4 Cal.App.4th 1260 , 1268 ; Fenton v. … As stated in City of Campbell v. Mosk (1961) 197 Cal.App.2d 640 , 650 : `The exercise of the discretion of the Attorney General in the grant of such approval to sue calls for care and delicacy.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion Number

    Louisiana Attorney General Reports · Oct 26, 2000

    State v. Harcis , 154 So. 628 (La. 1934). … In State v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

    Texas Attorney General Reports · Jul 2, 1950

    V-1011. County Attorney Grimes county Rer Authority of County School’ Anderson, Texas Board under Art. … Art, 2922-18, V. C.S.; A. G, Opinions Was, v-855 and 856.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion Number

    Louisiana Attorney General Reports · Jun 8, 2000

    R.S. 33:4861.1 , et seq.; State v. Opelousas Charity Bingo, 462 So.2d 1380 (La.App. 3rd Cir. 1985); and Theriot v. Terrebonne Parish Police Jury, 436 So.2d 515 (La. 1983). … See, e.g., U.S. v. Sosseur, 181 F.2d 873 , 875 (7th Cir. 1950); U.S. v. Casserino, 180 F. Supp. 288 , 289 (E.D.N.Y. 1960).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 178-81 (1981)

    Missouri Attorney General Reports · Dec 17, 1981

    In our view, the presiding judge of the county court is not a regular member of the board or an ex-officio member of the board in the normal sense under Section 162.301 .3 but is only considered a member of the board for … State v. Reid, 28 S.W. 172 (Mo.Sup. 1894). Therefore, Section 105.458 would not apply to the presiding judge in the situation you have presented.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Attorney General Opinion No.

    Kansas Attorney General Reports · Mar 27, 1997

    Board of Morton County Commr's , 247 Kan. at 660 ; State, ex rel., v. Hines , 163 Kan. 300 , 304 , 182 P.2d 865 (1947)." Finney , 254 Kan. at 654-55 . … Tompkins v. Bise , 259 Kan. 39 (1996).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Attorney General Opinion No.

    Kansas Attorney General Reports · Jul 21, 2006

    As stated in Heatherman v. … County Commissioners v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.