Case law

No.

Colorado Attorney General Reports · Apr 9, 1980

See , Andrews v. Nevada State Board of Cosmetology , 467 P.2d 96 (Sup.Ct. of Nev. 1970). … Greenburg v. Florida Board of Dentistry , 297 So.2d 628 (Fla.App. 1974).

Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

Texas Attorney General Reports · Jul 2, 1959

TEXAS Honorable Ned Price, Chairman Inauf3triaik~iaent Board Walton Building Austin, Texas opinion w. … V. Ceppert

Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

Texas Attorney General Reports · Jul 2, 1950

V-1011. County Attorney Grimes county Rer Authority of County School’ Anderson, Texas Board under Art. … Art, 2922-18, V. C.S.; A. G, Opinions Was, v-855 and 856.

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports · Jun 17, 1976

(See Board of Public Instruction of Duval County v. City of Jacksonville, 86 So.2d 887 (Fla. 1956); City of Titusville v. Board of Public Instruction of Brevard County, 258 So.2d 836 (4 D.C.A. … See Board of Public Inst. v. Little River Val. Drain. Dist., 119 So.2d 323 (3 D.C.A. Fla., 1960); City of Coral Gables v.

Opinion No. (2004)

California Attorney General Reports · Oct 13, 2004

Code, § 31450-31898; "Act") 1 authorizes counties to establish independent retirement systems for their employees. (§ 31500; 80 Ops.Cal.Atty.Gen 36 (1997); see Traub v. … Section 31580.2 states: "In counties in which the board of retirement, or the board of retirement and the board of investment, have appointed personnel pursuant to Section 31522.1 or 31522.5, or both, the respective board

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Nov 2, 2004

In Williams-El v. … Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564 , 569 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 2705 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972).

Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

Texas Attorney General Reports · Jul 2, 1975

The Texas Private Employment Agency Regulatory Board was created by article 5221a-6, V. T. C. … The powers of the Board are set out in section 15 of the statute, sub- sections (a) and (c) of which read: (a) The board is authorized to establish and promulgate a schedule of permissible

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Feb 28, 1997

Business Improvement Dist. v. … Moses v. Dautartas, 53 Ark.

Opinion Number

Louisiana Attorney General Reports · May 16, 2007

*Page 2 In the case of Bourgere v. … Inasmuch as we consider injunctive relief clearly proper under the rationales of Lentini v. City of Kenner , 252 La. 413 , 211 So.2d 311 (La. 1968) and Caddo Parish School Bd. v.

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports · Jan 10, 1978

Finn v. Finn, 312 So.2d 726 , 730 (Fla. 1975). Accord : Hillsborough County v. Pierce, 149 So.2d 912 , 917 (2 D.C.A. … Bair v. Central and Southern Florida Flood Con. Dist., 144 So.2d 818 , 820 (Fla. 1962). See also Town of Palm Beach v.

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Oct 9, 1995

and act as a judicial tribunal); and Byrd v. … See Rubens v. Hodges, 310 Ark. 451 , 837 S.W.2d 465 (1992), and Loyd v. Keathley, 284 Ark. 391 , 682 S.W.2d 739 (1985).

Attorney General Opinion No.

Kansas Attorney General Reports · Feb 19, 2002

Andrews v. Bd. of County Comm'rs of Cowley County , 207 Kan. 548 , 550 (1971). See also Justice , 17 Kan. App. 2d at 110 . 3 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 1973 et seq . 4 See Hayes v. Rogers , 24 Kan. 143 (1880); Keating v. … Mitchell v. Bd. of County Comm'rs of Reno County , 158 Kan. 573 (1944) (population disparity); State ex rel. v. Bd. of County Comm'rs of Montgomery County , 125 Kan. 379 (1926) (population disparity); State ex rel. v.

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Sep 24, 2003

The bylaws will therefore generally be determinative of whether a particular matter is within the board's power to direct. But cf. Preston v. Bass, 13 Ark. … See e.g., Mountain Home School District No. 9 v. T.M.J. Builders, Inc., 313 Ark. 661 , 858 S.W.2d 74 (1993).

Opinion No.

Texas Attorney General Reports · Aug 18, 1987

You suggest that JM-670 is in conflict with a recent Texas Supreme Court opinion, Central Education Agency of Texas et al. v. … of a majority of its board of trustees.

Attorney General Opinion No.

Kansas Attorney General Reports · Nov 12, 2004

You explain that although the Board has developed a reimbursement table for appointed attorney fees 1 the Board has not developed such a table for other types of defense services. … Co-op., Inc. v. State Corp. Com'n , 29 Kan.App.2d 652 , 660-61 (2001) (internal citations omitted).

Opinion No. (1996)

Nebraska Attorney General Reports · Nov 4, 1996

City of Schuyler v. Cornhusker Public Power Dist. , 181 Neb. 704 , 707 , 150 N.W.2d 588 , 590-91 (1967). See also Committee Records on LB 220, 73rd Neb. … Southern Nebraska Rural Public Power Dist. v. Nebraska Electric Generation and Transmission Cooperative, Inc. , 249 Neb. 913 , 920 , 546 N.W.2d 315 , 321 (1996).

Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

Texas Attorney General Reports · Jul 2, 1966

Gordon Lloyd, page 2 (C-704) is vested with the same discretion in the investment of its funds as is vested In the University of Texas Board of Re- gents in the investment of the funds entrusted to that Board. … V. Geppert, Chairman Job Reeves J. C. Davis Malcolm Quick Roy Johnson APPROVED FOR THE ATTORNEY QBNBRAL By: T. B. Wright -3402-

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports · Jan 25, 1979

See Missouri Gravel Co. v. … Crandon v. Hazlett, 26 So.2d 638 (Fla. 1946); Gessner v. Del-Air Corp., 17 So.2d 522 (Fla. 1944); White v. Crandon, 156 So. 303 (Fla. 1934); State ex rel . Burr v. Jacksonville Terminal Co., 71 So. 474 (Fla. 1916).

Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

Texas Attorney General Reports · Jul 2, 1949

Saps, page 2 (V-937) -. this State; . … Sapp, page 4 (V-937) apply for serriae retlrsmsntbensflts, he would then have had the right to shoose the mmnner in which his ser,Hoe r&frame& mllowauoe should be paid.

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports · Mar 16, 1987

Such a procedure would appear to constitute a variance from the statutorily prescribed method of appointing members of code enforcement boards without authorization by statute. See, Alsop v. … See also, Dobbs v. Sea Isle Hotel, 56 So.2d 341 (Fla. 1952), and Ideal Farms Drainage District v.