Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
2.24s
Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion: KP-0434
Texas Attorney General Reports · Feb 24, 2023
Dist. v. Standley, 280 S.W.2d 578, 583 (Tex. 1955) (quoting Dunbar v. Brazoria Cnty., 224 S.W.2d 738, 740 (Tex. Civ. App.—Galveston 1949, writ ref’d)). An emolument is “a pecuniary profit, gain or advantage.” … GA-0738 (2009) at 2). 2 See Tilley v. Rogers, 405 S.W.2d 220, 224 (Tex. Civ. App.—Beaumont 1966, writ ref’d n r.e.)
Cited 0 timesPublishedNew York Attorney General Reports · Feb 2, 1995
Cf ., Matter of MacDonald v Ordway , 219 N.Y. 328 , 332 (1916); Matter of Haller v Carlson , supra , p 830. … The board's function is to analyze the environmental impact of projects referred to them by the planning board and to make recommendations to the planning board.
Cited 0 timesPublishedUntitled Texas Attorney General Opinion
Texas Attorney General Reports · Jul 2, 1942
board of equalization..At the same meeting said council shall fix the time for the meeting of suoh board. … This canon of statutory construction is illustrated by the cese of Graham v. Lasater, 26 S. W. 472, holding that under Sayles Civil Statutes, Article 1517a.
Cited 0 timesPublishedFlorida Attorney General Reports · Dec 16, 1986
See also Gryzik v. … City of Orlando v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Jul 27, 2004
Raley v. Wagner, 346 Ark. 234 , 57 S.W.3d 683 (2001); Dunklin v. Ramsay, 328 Ark. 263 , 944 S.W.2d 76 (1997). … Stephens v. Arkansas Sch. for the Blind, supra (citing State v. McLeod, 318 Ark. 781 , 888 S.W.2d 639 (1994)). The basic rule of statutory construction is to give effect to the intent of the General Assembly. Ford v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedKansas Attorney General Reports · Jun 1, 2001
1412 (community college board of trustees). 6 Murray v. … See also Blevins v. Board of Douglas County Comm'rs , 251 Kan. 374 , 382 (1992). 9 Id . 10 Attorney General Opinion No. 92-136, citing Wycoff v. Board of County Comm'rs , 191 Kan. 658 , 665 (1963); Gossard v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedFlorida Attorney General Reports · Feb 27, 1985
V, and s 18, Art. … See, e.g., Lang v. Walker, 35 So. 78 , 80 (Fla. 1903); Gessner v. Del-Air Corporation, 17 So.2d 522 (Fla. 1944). And see, Molwin Inv. Co. v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedTexas Attorney General Reports · Jun 10, 1977
We believe that general laws governing expenditures by cities and counties would be applicable to such a board, e.g. V.T.C.S. art. 2368a. Compare Attorney General Opinion C-359 (1964) with V-1100 (1950). … SUMMARY The authority of a city-county recreation board to expend funds as well as the applicability of city charter provisions are matters to be determined by agreement between the city and county on whose behalf the board
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Jun 29, 2004
Byrd v. State, 240 Ark. 743 , 402 S.W.2d 121 (1966). … Tappan v. Helena Fed. Savings Loan Assn., 193 Ark. 1023 , 103 S.W.2d 458 (1937). Accord, Thompson v. Roberts, 333 Ark. 544 , 970 S.W.2d 239 (1998).
Cited 0 timesPublishedNebraska Attorney General Reports · May 1, 1996
Id. at 3 ( citing Hickenbottom v. Hickenbottom, 239 Neb. 579 , 477 N.W.2d 8 (1991)). … No. 96-018 at 4 ( quoting Moyer v. Douglas Lomason Co. , 212 Neb. 680 , 685 , 325 N.W.2d 648 (1982)).
Cited 0 timesPublishedUntitled Texas Attorney General Opinion
Texas Attorney General Reports · Jul 2, 1947
T0 B, Warden, Member Opinion No, V-310 State Board of Control Austin, Texas Re : Authority of the Board of Control to collect for … Warden, Page 4, V-310 eSecp 6.
Cited 0 timesPublishedUntitled Texas Attorney General Opinion
Texas Attorney General Reports · Jul 2, 1965
That the applicant 18 under twenty- one t21) years of age; or v(b). ?! … V. Cfeppert, Chairman ‘Milton Richardson Qllbetit J. Pena Sam Kelley Thomas W. Hack APPROVED FOR TRR ATTORNEY QERERAL BY T. B. Wri&t -2679-
Cited 0 timesPublishedNew York Attorney General Reports · Sep 18, 1986
v Hinman, 122 Misc.2d 531 , 534 [Sup Ct, Onondaga Co, 1984]). … The decisions of local boards have been set aside based upon a judicial finding of conflicts of interest of board members participating in the decisions ( ibid.; Taxpayers' Association v Town Board, 69 A.D.2d 320 [2d Dept
Cited 0 timesPublishedFlorida Attorney General Reports · Dec 20, 1990
Greenberg v. Florida State Board of Dentistry , 297 So.2d 628 (Fla. 1st DCA 1974); Florida Industrial Commission v. National Trucking Company , 107 So.2d 397 (Fla. 1st DCA 1958). 9 State ex rel. Greenberg v. … Florida Board of Dentistry, supra; State v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co ., 47 So. 969 (Fla. 1908). 10 St. Regis Paper Company v. State , 237 So.2d 797 (Fla. 1st DCA 1970); Florida Industrial Commission v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedMissouri Attorney General Reports · Apr 26, 1982
City of Willow Springs v. Missouri State Librarian, 596 S.W.2d 441 , 445 (Mo. banc 1980). In addition, we are to assign the words and phrases employed by the legislature their usual, plain and ordinary meaning. … Ashcroft v. Union Electric Co., 559 S.W.2d 216 , 221 (Mo.App. 1977). We find no express statutory provision granting authority to such a board to acquire legal title to property.
Cited 0 timesPublishedLouisiana Attorney General Reports · Nov 13, 2009
No member of the board of aldermen shall hold any other office or employment under the municipal government while he is a member of the board . . . … V. The incompatibility provisions of La.R.S. 42:64 should always be reviewed for applicability. La.R.S. 42:64 sets forth certain combinations of offices and employments which are deemed to be incompatible.
Cited 0 timesPublishedUntitled Texas Attorney General Opinion
Texas Attorney General Reports · Jul 2, 1968
aside as would a like contract between two individuals, as such rules are set out in the case of Stevenson v. … Section 19 of Article 542l.mprovides certain prerequisites to the declaring of a forfeiture by the Veterans' Land Board. Automatic forfeiture is not specified, but forfeiture operates at the discretion of the Board.
Cited 0 timesPublished70 Op. Att'y Gen. 48 · Wisconsin Attorney General Reports · Mar 19, 1981
La Follette v. … Thomson v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedNebraska Attorney General Reports · May 17, 2001
Board. … California v. Cabazon Band of Mission Indians , 480 U.S. 202 (1987).
Cited 0 timesPublishedFlorida Attorney General Reports · May 5, 2008
Sincerely, Bill McCollum Attorney General BM/tgh 1 See Board of Public Instruction of Broward County v. Doran , 224 So. 2d 693 (Fla. 1969); Canney v. … Board of Public Instruction of Alachua County , 278 So. 2d 260 (Fla. 1973). 2 See, e.g., Times Publishing Company v. Williams , 222 So. 2d 470 , 473 (Fla. 2d DCA 1969), disapproved in part on other grounds, Neu v.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna