Opinion

Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

Court
Texas Attorney General Reports
Filed
Jul 2, 1965
Status
Published
On the bench
Waggoner Carr
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

Hovember 30, 1965

Hr. Fred P. Bolub Opinion lfo. C-554

County Attorney

Hatagorda County Re: Yhefher, under the sub-

Bay City, Texas mitted facts, the Mational

Hall, through its Board of

Director5 can qualify under

Article 667, Vernon’s Penal

Code, 80 as to be entitled

to secure a license to sell

pear Hr. Holub: beer.

In your request for an opinion of this office, you state

the following facts:

“In Hatagorda County, Texas, we have

three mutual Insurance lodges in the Bless-

ing, Texas, area, known as S.P.J.S.T.,

K.J.Z.T. and K.J.T. S.P.J.S.T. is a mutual

Insurance company for men, women and cbll-

dren; K.J.Z.T. is a mutual insurance company

of women members of the Catholic religion

and K.J.T. Is a mutual insurance company of

men members of the Catholic religion. Each

of these three companies has a lodge here in

this County and all three lodge6 comprise of

quite a large membership.

"Because nane of these three lodges owned

a meeting hall, they decided to buy one to-

gether and call it The Mational Hall. They

bought an old school house and about two or

three acres of land near Blessing, Texas, and

each of these three lodges holds their month-

ly meetings in this hall. This has been going

on f3ome 20 years. The operation of the hall '

itself ia done by a board of directors known

aa The Hational Hall Board of Directors and it

appears that each of the three above lodges

sends or appoints annually two or three mem-

bers to the Board of Directors so that each

lodge haa equal representation on the opera-

tion of the hall.”

-2675-

Honorable Fred P. Holub, Page 2 (O-554)

You go on to state that The Datlonal Hall is in no way

incorporated but desires to make applioation through its Board

of Director8 for a beer license a8 an "organization." You ask

whether OF not this "organisafion" can qualify a8 an applicant.

Article 667, Section 5, Vernon's Penal Code, begins:

"Any person may file an application for

a license a8 a Manufacturer, Distributor or

Retail Dealer of beer In vacation or in term-

time with the County Judge of.the county in

which the applicant desires to engage in such

business. The County Judge shall refuse to

approve the application for such license if

he has reasonable grounds to believe and finds

any of the following to be true:

,I

. . .lr (Emphasis supplied)

Article 667, Section l(h), Vernon's Penal Code pro-

vides:

"(h). The term 'person' shall mean and

refer to any natural person or association

of natural $ersona, trustee, re5 9 ver,

partnership, corporation, or anization or

the manager, agent, servan +--T--

or emp oyee of

any of them." (Emphasis supplied)

The word "organization" connote8 a rather broad, generic

term and is not specifically defined in the Texas Liquor Con-

trol Act. Webster's Third tiew International Dictionary define8

an "orkzanieatlon" as "a RTOUD of veople that has a more or les,s

consta% membership, a b&y bf officers, a purpose, and usually

a set of regulations* among others. Under the facts as set out,

it would appear that The National Hall is an "organization" by

almost any definition. Under Section 5 and Section l(h) of

Article 667, supra, The Hational Hall would be technically qual-

ified as an applicant for a beer license.

It should further be noted that in the definition of

persons contained In Section l(h) of Article 667 set out above

that an "association of natural persons" Is a "person' who may

file an application, and presumably the Board of Dlreototis of

The Hational Hall would c$xalify under such definition. In addi-

tion, It follows that a manager, agent, servant, or employee"

of the Board of Director8 would be a "person" who could file an

application a8 a retail dealer of beer, and that the Chairman of

the Board would be such an "agent!' If so authorized by the Board.

-2676-

Honorable Fred P. Holub, Page 3 (C-554)

In considering Article 667, Section 5, SubSectiOn 2,

it should be observed that provision is made that .the county

judge Shall refuse to approve an application if he finds any

of the following to be true:

n a). That the applicant 18 under twenty-

one t21) years of age; or

v(b). ?!bat the applicant 18 indebted to the

State for any taxea, fees or penalties imposed

by this Act or by any rule or regulation of the

Board; or

"(c). That the place or manner In which the

applicant for a Retail Dealer's License may con-

duct his businelsa is of such nature which baaed

on the general welfare, health, peace, morals,

and safety of the people, and on the public

Benee of decency, warrants a refusal of the ll-

cenae; or

"(d). That the applicant $8 in the habit

of using alcoholic beverage8 to excess, or la

physically or mentally Incompetent; or

I". T!hat the applicant Is not a citizen

of the United States or has not been a citizen

of Texas for a period of three (3) years &a-

mediately preceding the flllng of hi8 applica-

tion, provided, however, that this Paragraph

(e) shall not apply to any person who has been

issrted a license or a renewal thereof on OF be-

fore September 1, 1948; or

"(f). That the applicant ha8 been finally

convicted of a felony during the two (2) years

next preceding the filing of his application; or

"(g). That the applicant is not of good

moral obaracter, t&t his reputation for being

a peaceable, law-abiding citizen in the com-

munity where he resides'~is bad; or

"(h). Itf a corporation, that the applicant

la not incorporated under the laws of this

State; or that at least fifty-one percent (51%)

of the stock of such corporation Is not owned

at all times by citizens who have resided with-

in this State for a peT;z;.of three (3) years

I .

Honorable Fred P. Holubj Page 4 (C-554)

and who posse88 the qualifications required

of other applicants for liaenseca; provided,

however, that this paragraph (h) shall not

ever apply to any holder of a Dletrlbutor~s

License in force and effect on January 1,

1953, OF amy renewal thereof; provided fur-

ther that this paragraph shall not apply to

applications for Beer Retailer'8 On-Premise

Licenses for railway dining, buffet or "club

COWS, WhiCh 1iOenScS may be iSSUed for a fee

Of Five Dollar8 ($5) fQr each car, psJnaemt

of which fee and application for which li-

centse shall be made direct to the Board."

Obviously, The Datlonal Hall as an "organization"

would not be able to meet these personal qualifications a6

you Indicate that a part of the member&Lp Is comprised of

Individuals who are under twenty-one (21) years of age.

The Board of Directors of The llational Hall acting in their

official capacity as Board of Director8 would not be able to

qualify under the personal requirements as a "manager, agent,

servant or employee" of the Blational Hall; Oui Per Alium Facit

Per Selpaum Facere Videtur. (He who does a thi by an agent

is considered a8 dolng it himself.) Co.Litt. 2% ; Broom,

r&x. 817. However, the individual members of the Board of Di-

rectors of the National Hall acting individually and not as

the Board of DireCtOrB, but rather a8 an naasoCiation of nat-

ural persons" could presumably qualify,under the requirements

of Subsection 2, Section 5 of Article 667 which are enumerated

above. In addition to the above requirements, the individual

DirectOrB would have to prove to the eatiefactlon,of the County

Judge that the lleense would not be used or displayed in the

operation of the buslneas conducted for the benefit of any per-

son not authorized by law to have an interest in said license.

Or stated more simply, that the license would be used only for

the benefit of the Individual members of the Board of Director8

and not for the benefit of The Hational Hall a8 a whole.

We therefore hold that the Board of Directors of The

Datlonal Hall acting individually could properly make appli-

cation for a license au a retail dealer of beer as an "asso-

elation of natural per8ons" and would be qualified to receive

such license if the individual Directors met the requirements

of Subsection 2, Section 5 of Article 667 which are enumerated

above. We further hold that a "mamager, agent, servant or em-

ployeen of the individual Directors could make an application

and be qualified to receive a beer license should he meet the

tests specified in Article 667, Section 5, 8ubsection 2.

-2678-

. .

Honorable Fred P. Holub, Page 5 (C-554)

SUMMARY

The Board of Directors acting indi-

vidually and not In their official capa-

city a8 Board of Directors of an unin~

oorporated organization would be an

“association of natural persons” witNn

the term person as defined by Article

667, Vernon’s Penal Code, and as such,

the individual DFrectors or a “manager,

agent, semant, or employee” of the in-

dividual Directors may qualify for a

beer lic’ense,

Yours very truly,

WAOQOHEFi

CARR

Attorney General of Texas

Assistant Attorney General

DHC/dt

APPROVED :

OPmIOl8 comm

W. V. Cfeppert, Chairman

‘Milton Richardson

Qllbetit J. Pena

Sam Kelley

Thomas W. Hack

APPROVED FOR TRR ATTORNEY QERERAL

BY T. B. Wri&t

-2679-

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.