Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
0.32s
Untitled California Attorney General Opinion
California Attorney General Reports · Jun 16, 1997
Dist. (1946) 28 Cal.2d 536, 540; Goodman v. Board of Education (1941) 48 Cal.App.2d 731, 734-738.) … (See California Teachers Assn v. Governing Board (1996) 45 Cal.App.4th 1383, 1391-1392; Savage v. Trammell Crow Con., Inc. (1990) 223 Cal.App.3d 1562, 1572-1573; U.C.
Cited 0 timesPublishedUntitled Texas Attorney General Opinion
Texas Attorney General Reports · Jul 2, 1939
Is the ease slnoe the order of the oouuty board reoites that the purported ooneollda- tion was kith the cohourrenoe of the rural high mhool board. … to the order entsred by the Colman County imbool Eoard which doe8 not purport to ‘aonsolldate the two olamen- tary eoboole exoept *‘top the enauin& vear.a In Chastein v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedNew York Attorney General Reports · May 14, 1992
The town board member was appointed to fill a vacancy on that board. … Taxpayers' Association v Town Board, 69 A.D.2d 320 (2d Dept 1979); see also, Matter of Zagoreos v Conklin, 109 A.D.2d 281 , 287 (2d Dept 1985).
Cited 0 timesPublishedFlorida Attorney General Reports · May 2, 1979
Harvey v. Board of Public Instruction, 133 So. 868 (Fla. 1931), and Buck v. McLean, 115 So.2d 764 (1 D.C.A. Fla., 1959). See also Molwin Investment Co. v. … Board of Public Instruction, supra ; and White v. Crandon, 156 So. 303 (Fla. 1934).
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Aug 26, 2003
See, e.g., Brewer v. Fergus, 348 Ark. 577 , 79 S.W.3d 831 (2002). … In Fields v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Mar 23, 2001
Admin. v. Pharmacy Assocs., 333 Ark. 451 , 970 S.W.2d 217 (1998); Stilley v. McBride, 332 Ark. 306 , 965 S.W.2d 125 (1998); Arkansas DOH v. Westark Christian Action, 322 Ark. 440 , 910 S.W.2d 199 (1995); Byrne v. … Young v. Rice, 308 Ark. 593 , 826 S.W.2d 252 (1992); Ragland v. Yeargan, 288 Ark. 81 , 702 S.W.2d 23 (1986).
Cited 0 timesPublishedKansas Attorney General Reports · Nov 6, 2002
The case, however, provides guidance in determining whether members of the Board of INK may delegate their duty to attend Board meetings. 10 Detroit Edison Co. v. … January 25, 2002); Matjasich v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedFlorida Attorney General Reports · Apr 22, 2010
Stat. 10 Hough v. Stembridge , 278 So. 2d 288 (Fla. 3d DCA 1973). And see City of Miami Beach v. Berns , 245 So. 2d 38 (Fla. 1971), Board of Public Instruction of Broward County v. … Leach-Wells v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedUntitled Texas Attorney General Opinion
Texas Attorney General Reports · Jul 2, 1939
Niohols-Steuart v. -ro6by, 89 8. W. 380, 87 Tar. 443. Another I4 that It took title subject to outetsndlng equl- tloa, and to only suoh title as Its wantor Willborn, poasenaed. … Nichols-Steuart V. Crosby, suprk.
Cited 0 timesPublishedLouisiana Attorney General Reports · Aug 23, 1993
respective boards of commissioners. … Nicholls v. Shakespeare, 6 So. 592 (La. 1889).
Cited 0 timesPublishedNew York Attorney General Reports · Feb 2, 1995
Cf ., Matter of MacDonald v Ordway , 219 N.Y. 328 , 332 (1916); Matter of Haller v Carlson , supra , p 830. … The board's function is to analyze the environmental impact of projects referred to them by the planning board and to make recommendations to the planning board.
Cited 0 timesPublishedKansas Attorney General Reports · May 12, 2003
K.S.A. 19-212 authorizes boards of county commissioners to adopt budgets and personnel policies: "The board of county commissioners of each county shall have the power, at any meeting: . . . . " Second . … of County Comm'rs of Lincoln County v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedKansas Attorney General Reports · Jun 1, 2001
1412 (community college board of trustees). 6 Murray v. … See also Blevins v. Board of Douglas County Comm'rs , 251 Kan. 374 , 382 (1992). 9 Id . 10 Attorney General Opinion No. 92-136, citing Wycoff v. Board of County Comm'rs , 191 Kan. 658 , 665 (1963); Gossard v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedFlorida Attorney General Reports · Feb 27, 1985
V, and s 18, Art. … See, e.g., Lang v. Walker, 35 So. 78 , 80 (Fla. 1903); Gessner v. Del-Air Corporation, 17 So.2d 522 (Fla. 1944). And see, Molwin Inv. Co. v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedUntitled Texas Attorney General Opinion
Texas Attorney General Reports · Jul 2, 1964
" & Refining Company v. Railroad W 2d 6,s( 641, s:w:2a 1075. … V. Geppert, Chairman Linward Shivers George Black Jerry Brock Ralph Rash APPROVEDFORTHEiATTORNEYGENERAL BY: Roger !&ler - 1493-
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Jun 29, 2004
Byrd v. State, 240 Ark. 743 , 402 S.W.2d 121 (1966). … Tappan v. Helena Fed. Savings Loan Assn., 193 Ark. 1023 , 103 S.W.2d 458 (1937). Accord, Thompson v. Roberts, 333 Ark. 544 , 970 S.W.2d 239 (1998).
Cited 0 timesPublishedNew York Attorney General Reports · Feb 17, 1998
See, Matter of Kelley v. McGee, 57 N.Y.2d at 538 . … Board of Education, Huntington v. Teachers, 30 N.Y.2d 122 (1972).
Cited 0 timesPublishedNebraska Attorney General Reports · May 1, 1996
Id. at 3 ( citing Hickenbottom v. Hickenbottom, 239 Neb. 579 , 477 N.W.2d 8 (1991)). … No. 96-018 at 4 ( quoting Moyer v. Douglas Lomason Co. , 212 Neb. 680 , 685 , 325 N.W.2d 648 (1982)).
Cited 0 timesPublishedUntitled Texas Attorney General Opinion
Texas Attorney General Reports · Jul 2, 1939
George v. Baker, 40 3. … such contracts have beenapproved by the county superintendent. ..This question was decide& In Miller v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedNew York Attorney General Reports · Sep 18, 1986
v Hinman, 122 Misc.2d 531 , 534 [Sup Ct, Onondaga Co, 1984]). … The decisions of local boards have been set aside based upon a judicial finding of conflicts of interest of board members participating in the decisions ( ibid.; Taxpayers' Association v Town Board, 69 A.D.2d 320 [2d Dept
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna