Opinion

Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

Court
Texas Attorney General Reports
Filed
Jul 2, 1939
Status
Published
On the bench
Gerald Mann
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

4

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXM

AUPnN

ExeoutivoSeoretery

Stat* Perk8 Board

Au$tin, -%a8

Dear Sir:

opbion Ioo.o-1

Rar huthorlty

t whioh ha8 been abun-

e tha proportiy ori@mll~ oan-

n pnrlourly doolrredby the

hold Sn twrt 18~ sevorelpar-

in a Doelaratioa0r Trulli, alLthou$h

o thm BtatoPark8 Board mado no

slsntlonof 8uoh doolorationand gmo no inrli-

ration that granter wao aotbg Sn aq Oopaolt~

othor them that or role mmer, would t&B Board

u&or the lOS9 Aat haro~aothority to searoythe

Hon. Frank &Inn, ?aEe ,?

property baok to the parties named in the Mola-

retlon of Trust?

As you polnted out In your letter, A. ii. Wlll-

born, joined by his wife, Ida %. %illborn, orl&nall~

convoyed a oertaln traot or land, now known ae the Fall-

lade8 Ytste Perk, to the State Farks Board, by a lpeolal

warranty deed In whloh ha appears to have sated only for

himSelr and not aa trustee for himself and othars. Cn

Jsnuery 7, 1931, more than two yeera prior to tho dato

OS the oonveyanoe, the Bald Xlllborn bad executed a

dsolaratlon of trust on the property.

Th+ deolaratlon of trurt reoltes that as a

result of tha ioreolorure of e vendor's llon on raid

propartr,, he had aoqulred tltlo to the proporty roar the

benotlt of him8alf and the o th e rleventoen tonants In

oommon named therein, all of whom had jointly purohased

the vendor's lien not&r. A. II. Glllborn, tbo original

donor, Is now dord. The other bensrlalal ownera, in-

oludlug tha holrs or Wlllborn and the hairs of those of

the other benefloial ownore who aro also dead, have ro-

questad t&at tho Stats Parka Board reoonvey t&e* undl-

vidod Interest to enoh, rsspeotlvely, by general warrenty

doed.

Tha portlnent part of sanato Bill 298; rhloh

amendaArtlole 6068, ron48 ar follows:

"If title to a site has become vested in

the State for park purposes and tha site i8

doemU unsuitable for a Stats Fark by the State

Parks Board . . . the Board 1s hereby authori-

zed and empowered . . . wltero the lend ha6 baen

donated by a olty, aounty Or othar (Ionor, to

transfer title to suah city or county or other

donor where they wish the site returned to

them . . .; provided that in all lnstanoel, where

the Board aota under authority of this ItatutO,

it must do 80 b a tvio-third8 a/3) vote of the

members o? the i oard, and prot I,d%ltbgtt$

Chairman OS the Board shall ai

mant.8 authorizad u&Or thlf6 A0t% -

Hon. Frank i&Inn, Pago 3

This Act merely ~lvos thr, Board authority to

transfer title to nuoh land to the donor; It 14 allent

as to OeSfUi6 quo trust and hslrr o? the donor. It make8

no provieloa for a warranty of any natwe, and %wdo not

believe that It oan be oonrtrued as authorizing the

Board to @irk any ruoh warranty. Sinoe the Board ao-

qulred title merely by special warranty doad, It oer-

tainlf should not b4 called upon to return more than It

rooelved , anU a reconveyance with a general warranty

would, In effect, b4 (rlvlw more than It reoelved. There-

lore, In amw4r to your first quastion, It 14 our opinion

that the Bosrd has no authority, at least In the Instant

ease, to execute a warranty doad.

Co heve also reached the oonolueion that und4r

the Aot, the Board has no authority to make a oonveysnoo

of title to me Intereot of any o? the oeatulr que trust

4xoept that of the donor, A. 8. Willborn, 4lnoe under our

Interpretation of the tranaaotion, the Board auqulred title

only to hle Intorest. Ono of the reaaone for our Inter-

pretation la, that aa the State peld nothing ?or th4 land,

It oannot quall?y as a bona iId4 purohaaer for value.

Niohols-Steuart v. -ro6by, 89 8. W. 380, 87 Tar. 443.

Another I4 that It took title subject to outetsndlng equl-

tloa, and to only suoh title as Its wantor Willborn,

poasenaed. Nichols-Steuart V. Crosby, suprk.

In the abaenoe of a wrItten authorization iron

the seventeen other ben4rlolarIea named In the Dealaration,

the oonveyenoe to the State Perk8 Board, as to their Int-

ereata, I4 invalid under Artlola 1288, B. 0. S. of Texas,

1983, whloh requires that all oonveyanoee of land, aa well

ss the authority of ago&e to aonvey land, shall be in

writing.

The Bill makea no epeoifio provirion for 00~

teysnoe to the heirs of the deoeesed donors. Eowevar ,

the obvious objoot of th4 Bill Ie to dlveat ths Board o?

title to land whioh Is un&itablo for park pUposea, and

to pcrmlt euoh land to be put to other ua44.

Wa assume that the negotiations preoedlng th4

oonveyanoe disoloee that the land was OrIginallY oonveyed

?or the purpose of oonverting It Into a park althoueh 4uoh

intent wms not 4xpresaed In the instrument. W4 believe

Eon. Frank Quinn, Page 4

that Senate Bill 890 was Intended to authorize a reoon-

veyanoe to the donors where auoh use la not made of the

land beoauae of uDlultabIllty and for which reeaon the

Stats Parka Board dealres to return t&e lend. The death

of the orl,@nal donor does not defeat the purpooe of the

statute but m4rely ontltles the doq’a heir6, deVim846

or loge i repre84ntatIves to r4oelve the reoonveyanoe.

Therefore, beaed upon our aasumptlon that the

donor*8 original purpose ln oonveyiri& the property now

kncwn a8 Pellaadea State Park wa8 for oonverting It into

a park, It is our opinion that the Board hae the.authorl-

tp to reoonvey suah title aa It r4oelved to the property,

namely, title to the undivided lntereet of A. H, Willborn.

In your statement 0s raotm, you stats that the

heirs of A. H. Klllborn desire th0 reoonveyanoo Of hi8

Intereat; it Is our opinion that the are entitled to

same. However, the deed to A. li. WI1 Iborn’s lnterost

is made to hlr satate. A oonveyenoe to either would,

In our opinion, be propor.

The deeds aooompanplng your lettor and returned

herewith are ln general warranty form. hlao, there era

dOads to the verlour other Intoroots lnoluded under the

Deolaration o? Trust. It follow8 from our opinion that

none of the deodrr should be ex@outed, the one to t&o

Wlllborn estate beoause not In proper form and the othera

both beoauae not In proper form and beoause they purport

to oonvey an Interest not held by the State Perks Board.

;$ruatlng that this 8atl~?6OtOrlly an8wefl your

Inquiry, we are

Your4 very truly

ATTORY GXNB3ALOB TBXfiS

Asalstant

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.