Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersSAG

10,000+ results

0.80s

  • Ago

    Florida Attorney General Reports · Dec 13, 1996

    Thus, the school board may reject a nominated employee only for good cause. The term "good cause" is not defined in the statute. In Spurlin v. … Stephens v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No.

    Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Jul 16, 1991

    Wiseman v. Affolter, 192 Ark. 509 , 92 S.W.2d 388 (1936). … See Donovan v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

    Texas Attorney General Reports · Jul 2, 1990

    ssioners Court of U&&G& Countv v. Martin 471 Civ. … While wsioners Court of Harris Countv v. Full.f&~r ton, 596 S.W.ld 572 (Tex. Civ.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1996)

    Nebraska Attorney General Reports · Aug 21, 1996

    The Nebraska Supreme Court has held that the Pardons Board has "unfettered discretion" to grant or deny an application for clemency. Otey v. State , 240 Neb. 813 , 828-30 (1992). … Stenberg v. Moore , 249 Neb. 589 , 595 (1996).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 40-82 (1982)

    Missouri Attorney General Reports · Apr 26, 1982

    City of Willow Springs v. Missouri State Librarian, 596 S.W.2d 441 , 445 (Mo. banc 1980). In addition, we are to assign the words and phrases employed by the legislature their usual, plain and ordinary meaning. … Ashcroft v. Union Electric Co., 559 S.W.2d 216 , 221 (Mo.App. 1977). We find no express statutory provision granting authority to such a board to acquire legal title to property.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion Number

    Louisiana Attorney General Reports · Nov 16, 2006

    To that end, seldom, if ever, do the board members serve exactly six years. … For instance, if a board — member was appointed October 23, 2002, his term would expire October 22, 2007. Moreover, we base our opinion upon the decision of the appellate court's ruling in Clark v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

    Texas Attorney General Reports · Jul 2, 1947

    Board of Wster Engineers - Page 3, V-82 to the amendment of October 18, 1941. … Board of Water Engineers - Page 8, v-82 1942, olearly carry the irrigationuse on all except 1.787acrea beyond the watershed.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion Number

    Louisiana Attorney General Reports · Feb 24, 1992

    This statute has, on several occasions, been interpreted by Louisiana courts as a limit on the amount of time boards may contract with employees. See Andrepont v. … Lake Charles Harbor and Terminal District, 586 So.2d 722 (La.App. 3d Cir. 1991), Hayden v. Richland Parish School Board, 554 So.2d 164 (La.App. 2d Cir. 1989), Shows v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Ago

    Florida Attorney General Reports · Dec 22, 1978

    Landis v. … Hall v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

    Texas Attorney General Reports · Jul 2, 1947

    Woods State Superintendent of Public Instruction Department of Education Austin, Texas Opinion NO. v-181 Attention: Hon. T. M. … Woods, page 4 v-181 didates who receive the largest number of votes, are elected as trustees of the consolidated dis- trict board.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Ago

    Florida Attorney General Reports · May 7, 1980

    S.; thus, the district school board operates as a continuing body. Cf . Daly v. … See also Johnson v. Johansen, 338 So.2d 1300 (1 D.C.A.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1992)

    Missouri Attorney General Reports · Jan 28, 1992

    Furthermore, such section provides that the board shall exercise all powers of the board without delegation thereof to any other body or entity or association or to less than a quorum of the board. In Pearson v. … Louis County v. Board of Education of Pattonville Consolidated School District R-3, 315 S.W.2d 873 , 877 (Mo.App., St.L. 1958).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opn. No.

    New York Attorney General Reports · Jun 18, 1980

    Beebe v Supervisors of Sullivan County, 64 Hun 377 (3d Dept, 1892) unanimously affd on op below 142 N.Y. 631 (1894); Wood v Town of Whitehall, 120 Misc. 124 (Sup Ct, Washington Co) unanimously affd on op below 206 App. … Shirey v Pearson, 121 Misc. 26 (Sup Ct, Cayuga Co) affd without op 207 App. Div. 888 (4th Dept, 1923); Macrum v Hawkins, 141 Misc. 358 (Sup Ct, Suffolk Co, 1931) affd 235 App.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion Number

    Louisiana Attorney General Reports · Oct 16, 2009

    of Directors of the Industrial Development Board of the City of Gonzales, Louisiana, Inc. v. … All Taxpayers, Property Owners, Citizens of the City of Gonzales, et al. , 2005-2298 (La. 9/6/06), 938 So.2d 11 (the " Cabela's " case), the Louisiana Supreme Court abandoned its prior analysis in City of Port Allen. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1998)

    California Attorney General Reports · Mar 5, 1998

    (See Walters v. Reed (1988) 45 Cal.3d 1 , 7 ; Smith v. Smith (1955) 45 Cal.2d 235 , 239 ; Fenton v. … PUBLIC INTEREST As stated in City of Campbell v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion Number

    Louisiana Attorney General Reports · Dec 21, 2000

    Who has the authority to withdraw the petition for reduction of the Terrebonne Parish School Board and to establish the School Board districts the same as the councilmanic districts that was submitted to the Terrebonne Parish … See , for example, Connick v. City of New Orleans , 543 So.2d 66 (La.App. 4 Cir. 1989), and State ex. Re. Hutton v. City of Baton Rouge , 47 So.2d 665 (La. 1950).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

    Texas Attorney General Reports · Jul 2, 2000

    GOV’TCODEANN. 5 2308.255(b)(2) (V emon 2000). In addition, board members who represent the private sector “must reasonably represent the industrial and demographic composition of the business community.” … Board, we do not consider your second question, which assumes that the person is ineligible to serve on the board.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Ago

    Florida Attorney General Reports · May 18, 1978

    Greenberg v. Florida State Bd. of Dent., 297 So.2d 638 (1 D.C.A. Fla., 1974), cert. dismissed , 300 So.2d 900 (Fla. 1974). The board is authorized pursuant to s. 458.041(2), F. … Rawls v. State, 122 So. 222 (Fla. 1929); Gavagan v. Marshall, 33 So.2d 682 (Fla. 1948). Additionally, statutes dealing with compensation to public officials are required to be strictly construed. Pridgeon v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 126-76 (1976)

    Missouri Attorney General Reports · Sep 22, 1976

    Smith v. Bowman, 170 S.W. 700, 703 (Spr.Ct.App. 1914). See also Witmer v. Nichols, 8 S.W.2d 63 (Mo. 1928); Smith v. Hendricks, 136 S.W.2d 449 (Spr.Ct.App. 1939); and Nodaway County v. Kidder, 129 S.W.2d 857 (Mo. 1939). … The basis for this prohibition is discussed by the Missouri Supreme Court in Witmer v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Ago

    Florida Attorney General Reports · Nov 21, 2007

    And see State v. … Sea Isle Hotel, 56 So. 2d 341 , 342 (Fla. 1952); Thayer v. State , 335 So. 2d 815 , 817 (Fla. 1976).

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.