Case law

Opn. No.

New York Attorney General Reports · Dec 21, 1982

The Crime Victims Compensation Law creates no legally cognizable cause of action or right of recovery ( Mtr. of Gryziec v Zweibel, 74 A.D.2d 9 , 13 [4th Dept, 1980]; Johnson v Nissman, 39 A.D.2d 578 [2d Dept, 1972]). … Generally, local laws that do not prohibit what State law permits or allow what State law forbids are not considered inconsistent ( Wholesale Laundry Board of Trade, Inc. v City of New York, 17 A.D.2d 327 [1st Dept, 1962]

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Oct 29, 1998

Byrd v. State, 240 Ark. 743 , 745 , 402 S.W.2d 121 (1966). … Tappan v. Helena Fed. Savings Loan Assn., 193 Ark. 1023 , 1025 , 103 S.W.2d 458 (1937).

Opinion No. (1998)

California Attorney General Reports · Jun 23, 1998

In Cumero v. Public Employment Relations Board , supra , 49 Cal.3d at 591 , the court stated: ". . . … San Antonio Community College District v. Public Employment Relations Board (1989) 210 Cal.App.3d 178 ; Santa Monica Community College District v. Public Employment Relations Board (1980) 112 Cal.App.3d 684 ).

Opinion Number

Louisiana Attorney General Reports · Aug 27, 2010

"BUDDY" CALDWELL Attorney General By: _______________________ DENISE BROU FITZGERALD Assistant Attorney General JDC/DBF/lbw 1 Manuel v. La. … Farms, Ltd. v. Exxon Mobil Corp. , 2007-2371 (La. 7/1/08), 998 So.2d 16 .

Attorney General Opinion No.

Kansas Attorney General Reports · Feb 22, 1996

Fatzer, Attorney General, v. Board of Regents , 167 Kan. 587 (1949). … Gen. v. Armory Board et. al ., 174 Kan. 369 (1953).

Opinion Number

Louisiana Attorney General Reports · May 13, 2005

The first circuit discussed the burden of proof requirements of Article 1846 in Pennington Const., Inc. v. R.A. … Prestridge v. Elliott, 2003-94 (La.App. 3 Cir. 6/4/03) , 847 So.2d 789 also considered the issue of whether there were corroborating circumstances sufficient to establish an oral contract to be a question of fact.

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports · Sep 19, 1978

See also Turk v. … Greenberg v. Florida State Board of Dentistry, 297 So.2d 628 (1 D.C.A. Fla., 1974), cert. dismissed , 300 So.2d 900 (Fla. 1974); Gessner v. Del-Air Corporation, 17 So.2d 522 (Fla. 1944).

Opinion No. (2001)

Nebraska Attorney General Reports · Dec 26, 2001

V. City of Lincoln, 243 Neb. 178 , 186 , 498 N.W.2d 102 , 108 (1993). … Lincoln Dairy Co. v. Finigan, 170 Neb. 777 , 104 N.W.2d 227 (1960). The amount of authority which the Department and the Board would have is dependent upon the existence of a federal pork assessment scheme. If the U.S.

Attorney General Opinion No.

Kansas Attorney General Reports · Feb 3, 2000

counties to establish a juvenile corrections advisory board for the purpose of formulating a comprehensive plan for juvenile correctional services and making recommendations to the board or boards of county commissioners … of County Commissioners , 2. 18 Funding Instructions issued by the Kansas Juvenile Justice Authority in July, 1999, subsection D. 19 K.S.A. 1998 Supp. 75-6104 (v).

Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

Texas Attorney General Reports · Jul 2, 1978

See also art. 67Old, S 27(a)(5); but see Penal Code S 1.08; Attorney General Opinion V-429 (1947) (county possesses no general police power to regulate traffic). … (1977)(assessment of road tax not dependent= outstanding bond indebtedness); H-990 (1977) (county may not charge tolls for ferry); WW-1482 (1962) (county may not assess fees on motorboats using county park); V-

Attorney General Opinion No.

Kansas Attorney General Reports · Feb 7, 2000

We do not believe that the Board members meet any of the typical tests for being employees; the issue is whether the Board members are officers of the state. In Durflinger v. … "See also Steere v. Cupp , 226 Kan. 566 , 572 , 602 P.2d 1267 (1979). Two years before Sowers , this court in Miller v.

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports · May 2, 1979

Harvey v. Board of Public Instruction, 133 So. 868 (Fla. 1931), and Buck v. McLean, 115 So.2d 764 (1 D.C.A. Fla., 1959). See also Molwin Investment Co. v. … Board of Public Instruction, supra ; and White v. Crandon, 156 So. 303 (Fla. 1934).

Opinion Number

Louisiana Attorney General Reports · Nov 8, 2010

Regents of the University of California v. Bakke , 438 U.S. 265 , 290-91 (1978), quoting Hirabayahshi v. United States , 320 U.S. 81,100 (1943). With respect to pre-employment inquiries, the U.S. … as this practice could unnecessarily expose the school board to liability.

Opinion No. Oag 97-77, (1977)

66 Op. Att'y Gen. 318 · Wisconsin Attorney General Reports · Nov 25, 1977

In Davidson v. … In Nevens v.

Opinion No. (2003)

California Attorney General Reports · Feb 20, 2003

The board may pay from any available funds such compensation as it deems proper for these special services. . . ." In Darley v. … Union v. Board of Trustees (1996) 47 Cal.App.4th. 1661 [management of a college bookstore determined to be a "special service"].)

Opinion No. (2002)

Nebraska Attorney General Reports · Apr 23, 2002

Stenberg v. Moore, 249 Neb. 589 , 544 N.W.2d 344 (1996). … "In Ruge v.

Attorney General Opinion No.

Kansas Attorney General Reports · Jan 23, 1995

Ullrich v. Board of Thomas County Commissioners , 234 Kan. 782 , 788-89 (1984). The computers remain the property of the unified school district and may be used only for school purposes. … Communication by computer terminals among the board members does not involve physical presence of members, therefore, it is not a "gathering or assembly" according to the Kansas Supreme Court in Stephan v.

Attorney General Opinion No.

Kansas Attorney General Reports · Jan 23, 1995

Attorney General Opinion No. 94-105 and Bruns v. Kansas Board of Technical Professions are related in that both deal with a regulatory board's authority to interpret legislation. … The Kansas Supreme Court has long given judicial deference to an administrative board's interpretation of a statute that it enforces. Blue v. McBride , 252 Kan. 894 , 923 (1993); Kansas Board of Regents v.

Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

Texas Attorney General Reports · Jul 2, 1968

in the Basic Sciences when such person has complied with the .requirementsas stated in Section 16a of the Minimum~Standards Law, codified,as 459oc, -v;T.c.s.?" … V. Geppert ,Ralph Rash Neil Williams Lonny Zwiener Roger,Tyler A. J. CARUBBI. JR. Staff Legal Assistant ,.

Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

Texas Attorney General Reports · Jul 2, 1970

There is always a strong presumption in favor oi the validitv of the statute and the acts verformed thereunder, Department of Health, State of New Jersey v. Gwens- Co;x&g Fiber Glass Corporation, ~100 N.J. … Houston Compressed Steel Corporation v. The State of Texas, S.W.Zd (Tex.Civ.App., Houston, June 25, 1970, Rehearingoverruled, July 23, 1970).