Opinion

Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

Court
Texas Attorney General Reports
Filed
Jul 2, 1968
Status
Published
On the bench
Crawford Martin
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

Hon. J. Manley Head Opinion No. M-181

Executive Secretary

Texas Board of Chiropractic Re: Whether under Article 459Oc.

Examiners V.C.S., the Texas State Board

Downtowner Office Building of Examiners in the Basic Sci-

300 E. 11th St., Suite L-7 ences has the authority or

Austin, Texas 78701 discretion to deny a certif-

icate of proficiency to an

applicant who presents a

transcript of credits show-

ing satisfactory completion

of sixty or more semester

hours of college credits as

prescribed by Section 16-a

of the Act and who is other-

wise qualified by law, and

Dear Mr. Head: related questions.

In connection with the current procedures on issu-

ance of certificates, the Texas State Board of Examiners in

the Basic Sciences has advised you that it will be the policy

of said Board to deny certification by waiver when the appli-

cation is based on college work carried simultaneously with,

or in addition to a normal course of study in a professional

school.

In your request for an opinion from this office you

state the following:

"Upon studying Section 16a of the Minimum

Standards Law, under which the Texas State

Board of Examiners in the Basic Sciences op-

erate and codified as 459Oc. V.T.C.S.. we

find the following language:

-~'I

'Sec. 16-a. The Board shall issue a

certificate of proficiency to any person

-865-

Hon. J. Manley.Head, Page 2 (M-181)

who is otherwise qualified by law and who

shall present to the Board a transcript of

credits certifying that such person has

satisfactorily completed sixty (60) semester

hours or more of college credits at a col-

lege or university which issues credits

acceptable to the University of Texas lead-

ing t,ward a Bachelor of Arts or a Bachelor

,of Science Degree; said college or univer-

sity credits shall include the satisfactory

completion of all the subjects enumerated

in Section 1 of this Act with an average

of seventy-five percent (75%) or better in

each of such courses: and the University

.of Texas shall offer at the Main University

at Austin, Texas, beginning with the fall

semester 1949, courses in each of the enu-

erated subjects.'

"Heretofore, certificates of proficiency

have been granted to students upon proper pre-

sentation of their credentials as required by

law. Such certificates were then presented to

the Texas Board of Chiropractic Examiners prior

to examination as required by law.

"My questions are as follows:

"(1) Under the statute, does the Texas

State Board of Examiners in the Basic Sciences

have the authority to withhold, challenge, delay,

or deny a certificate of proficiency to any per-

son who is otherwise qualified by law.and who

presents to the Board transcripts of credits

certifying that such person has satisfactorily

completed sixty (60) semester hours or more of

college credits acceptable to and approved by

the University of Texas?

"(2) As used in Section 16a, do the words

'satisfactorily' and 'satisfactory' apply to

-866-

Hon. J. Manley Head, page 3::.(M:lSl).

.~.

the University of Texas or do they relate and

apply to the.Texas State Board of Examiners in

the Basic Sciences?

"(3) Does the Texas State Board of Exam-

iners in the Basic Sciences have the legal

right or authority to.reject, modify, change,

withhold, delay, or~refuse to grant a .person

a certificate of proficiency in the Basic

Sciences when such person has complied with

the .requirementsas stated in Section 16a

of the Minimum~Standards Law, codified,as

459oc, -v;T.c.s.?"

.,

'.Section 4 of Article 459Oc, Vernon's Civil Statutes,

provides thatthe Board shall make such~rules and regulations,

not inconsistent with the.law, as hit deems expedient to carry

this Act into effect. It is not the function of the Board to

enlarge or modify the statutory requirements laid down by the

legislature in Article 459Oc, Section 16-a. In 1 Tex,Jur.Zd

652, Administrative Law, Section 6, it is stated:

"Generally the powers of an admfnistra-

tive agency are derived entirely from legisla-

tive enactment. 'The agency has only such powers

as are expressly conferred on it by statute to-

gether with those necessarily implied from pow-

ers and duties expressly given or imposed.

"Although a statute conferring administra-

tive authority will generally be liberally con-

strued, the agency must not go beyond the clear

intent of the legislature. It may not enlarge

its powers by its own orders, or exercise a

power expressly conferred not upon it, but

upon another agency or arm of government."

The rules and regulations adopted by an agency must be with-

in the clear intent of the statute, and not in excess of the

powers delegated. 1 Tex.Jur.2d 657,~Administrative Law, Sec-

tion ll.:.The'language of Article 459Oc neither expressly nor

Hon. J. Manley Head, page 4 (M-181) ~:

impliedly gives the Board any discretionary powers to impose

requirements upon applicants other than those requirements set

out in thit statute itself.

We answer the three questions contained in your let-

ter as follows:.

(1) Under,the provisions of Section 16-a,of Arti-

cle 459Oc, the Texas State Board of Examiners in the Basic

Sciences does not have the authority to withhold, challenge,

delay, or deny a certificatesof proficiency to any person who is

otherwise qualified by law and who presents.to the Board Wan-

-scripts of credits certifying that such .personhas satisfactorily

comple~tedsixty',(60)semester hours or'more o.fcollege credits

acceptable to and approved by the University of Texas,

(2) As used in Section 16-a of said Articlg~4590c,

the words "satisfactorily" and ,"satisfactory"apply ,tothe Uni-

versity.of Texas and not to the ~Texas State Board of Examiners

in the Basic Sciences;

(3) The Texas State Board of Examiners in the Basic

Sciences does not have the legal right or authority to reject,

modify, change, withhold, delay. or refuse to grant a person

a certLficate of proficiency in the basic sciences when such

person has complied with the requirements as stated in Section

16-a of Article,4590c.

SUMMARY

The Texas State Board of Examiners in the

Basic Sciences does not have the anthorlty or

discretion to deny a certificate of proficiency

to an applicant who is otherwise qualified by

law and who shall present to the Board a tran-

script of credits showing satisfactory com-

pletion of sixty (60) or more semester hours

of college credits as prescribed by Section

16-a of Article 4590c,yernon's~Civil Statutes.

:,

-868-

.

Hon. J. Manley Head, page i (M-181)

& truly yours..

FORD C. MARTIN

orney General of Texas

Prepared by.J+ck Sparks

.Assistant Attorney General

APPROVED:

: OPINION COMMITTEES

Hawthorne~Phillips. Chairman

.KernsTaylor, Co-Chairman

W. V. Geppert

,Ralph Rash

Neil Williams

Lonny Zwiener

Roger,Tyler

A. J. CARUBBI. JR.

Staff Legal Assistant

,.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.