Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersSAG

10,000+ results

0.65s

  • Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

    Texas Attorney General Reports · Jul 2, 1957

    -v. IJJ S.W.2d 347 (Tex.Civ.App. 1937, . . … giedman w 131 Tex v. AmericanS&etp Co.'

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No.

    Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Feb 25, 1996

    Quinney v. Pittman, 320 Ark. 177 , 895 S.W.2d 538 (1995). … Donoho v. Donoho, 318 Ark. 637 , 887 S.W.2d 290 (1994).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

    Texas Attorney General Reports · Jul 2, 1975

    Arnette: On behalf of the Texas State Board of Pharmacy you have asked whether the Board under article 4542a, V. T. C. S. … Section 4 of article 4542a, V. T. C.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. Oag 41-87, (1987)

    76 Op. Att'y Gen. 173 · Wisconsin Attorney General Reports · Jul 13, 1987

    State v. Smith , 50 Wis.2d 460 , 471-72 , 184 N.W.2d 889 (1971); Elkhorn School Dist. v. East Troy School Dist ., 110 Wis.2d 1 , 4 , 327 N.W.2d 206 (Ct.App. 1982). … Kleczka v. Conta , 82 Wis.2d 679 , 708-09 , 264 N.W.2d 539 (1978).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Opn. No.

    New York Attorney General Reports · Apr 13, 1976

    And to the same effect are the following authorities: Minot v. Inhabitants of West Roxbury (supra); Anthony v. Adams ( 1 Met. 284 ); Parsons v. Inhabitants of Goshen ( 11 Pick. 396 ); Lemnon v. … City of Newton ( 134 Mass. 476 ); Cornell v. Town of Guilford ( 1 Denio, 510 ); Board of Supervisors v. Ellis, ( 59 N.Y. 620 )."

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion Number

    Louisiana Attorney General Reports · Nov 1, 2005

    , and city school boards within their respective districts and of every state board or commission domiciled therein, including levee boards, hospital and asylum boards, education boards, and all state boards and commissions … We also call your attention to the decision rendered in Department of State Civil Service v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

    California Attorney General Reports · Aug 23, 1995

    (Brown v. Kelly Broadcasting Co., supra, 48 3. 95-513 Cal.3d 711, 724, quoting Moyer v. … Superior Court (1979) 25 Cal.3d 474, 495; Amador Valley Joint Union School District v. State Board of Equalization (1978) 22 Cal.3d 208, 245-246.)

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No.

    Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Dec 5, 2001

    Pennington v. Oliver, 245 Ark. 251 , 254 , 431 S.W.2d 843 (1968), quoting Faucette, Mayor v. Gerlach, 132 Ark. 58 , 200 S.W. 279 (1918). The acts of de facto officers are valid. See Appleby v. Belden Corp., 22 Ark. … See e.g., Sitton v. Burnett, 216 Ark. 574 , 226 S.W.2d 544 (1950). In my opinion, therefore, the school board director you describe, during the period he lacks the requisite residence, is ineligible to hold the office.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • (2006)

    91 Op. Att'y Gen. 145 · Maryland Attorney General Reports · Jul 10, 2006

    The Court of Appeals has held that a county board of education "is not part of the executive branch of the county government nor an agency under its control." Board of Education v. … See also Chesapeake Charter, Inc. v. Anne Arundel County Bd. Of Educ., 358 Md. 129 , 136-37 , 747 A.2d 625 (2000) (summarizing the status of a local board); Board of Education of Prince George's County v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (2000)

    California Attorney General Reports · Feb 25, 2000

    Chapman v. Rapsey (1940) 16 Cal.2d 636 , 641-642 ; 66 Ops.Cal.Atty.Gen. 176 , 177 (1983).) … (Dibb v. County of San Diego (1996) 8 Cal.4th 1200 , 1212 ; 78 Ops.Cal.Atty.Gen. 362 , 364-365 (1995).) A person serving in an advisory capacity does not exercise any sovereign powers. (See Parker v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No.

    Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Dec 22, 2006

    See Davis v. Holt , 304 Ark. 619 , 804 S.W.2d 362 (1991) (applying Ark. … See Davis, supra ; Thomas v. Sitton, 213 Ark. 816 , 212 S.W.2d 710 (1948).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1998)

    California Attorney General Reports · Jan 16, 1998

    Statutes are to be blended into each other, even when they are in different codes. ( Meninga v. Raley's, Inc . (1989) 216 Cal.App.3d 79 , 90 ; Austin v. Board of Retirement (1989) 209 Cal.App.3d 1528 , 1532 .) … This construction is consistent with the Board's administrative interpretation. (See Dix v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

    Texas Attorney General Reports · Jul 2, 1974

    Buckeye Power, Inc. v. Environment81 Protection Agency, 481 F. Zd 162 (6th Cir. 1973); Americ8n Express Co. v. U.S., 472 F. Zd 1050 (C.C. P.A. Austin, PItent App. 1973); Willrpoint Cysterr, Inc. v. … See City of Houston v. Blackbird, 394 S. W. Zd 159, 163 (Tex. Sup. 1965); Victory v. St8te, 158 S. W. Zd 760. 766 (Tex. Sup. 1942).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1998)

    Nebraska Attorney General Reports · Aug 18, 1998

    Jolly v. State, 252 Neb. 289 , 562 N.W.2d 61 (1997). See also PLPSO v. Papillion/La Vista School Dist., 252 Neb. 308 , 562 N.W.2d 335 (1997); Southeast Rur. Vol. Fire Dept. v. Neb. … Dept. of Rev., 251 Neb. 852 , 560 N.W.2d 436 (1997); Grand Island Latin Club v. Nebraska Liquor Control Com'n, 251 Neb. 61 , 554 N.W.2d 778 (1996); CenTra, Inc. v. Chandler Ins.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Attorney General Opinion No.

    Kansas Attorney General Reports · Nov 20, 2003

    Miller v. Board of Education (Peabody) , 212 Kan. 482 , Syl. ¶ 6 (1973). 3 U.S.D. No. 380 v. McMillen , 212 Kan. 482 (1993); Peabody , supra . 4 Bd. of Ed. of U.S.D. No. 443, Ford County v. … Berg , 270 Kan. 237 , 238 (2000). 15 State v. Dewey , 22 Kan. App. 2d 963 , 966 (1996). See also Huelsman v. Kansas Department of Revenue , 267 Kan. 456 (1999). 16 K.A.R. 91-22-1a . 17 Bates v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • (2005)

    90 Op. Att'y Gen. 17 · Maryland Attorney General Reports · Jan 5, 2005

    Walker v. State, 125 Md. … Fitzgerald v. Hampton, 467 F.2d 755 (D.C. Cir. 1972). *Page 24

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No.

    Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Dec 19, 2001

    See e.g., Stephens v. Arkansas School for the Blind, 341 Ark. 939 , 20 S.W.3d 397 (2000); Central Southern Companies, Inc. v. Weiss, 339 Ark. 76 , 3 S.W.3d 294 (1999); and Ford v. … See e.g., McDonald v. Pettus, 337 Ark. 265 , 988 S.W.2d 9 (1999); and Brimer v. Arkansas Contractors Licensing Bd., 312 Ark. 401 , 405 , 849 S.W.2d 948 (1993).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

    California Attorney General Reports · Oct 15, 1997

    (Brown v. Kelly Broadcasting Co. (1989) 48 Cal.3d 721, 724.) "In so doing we turn first to the statutory language, since the words the Legislature chose are the best indicators of its intent. … (Rojo v. Kliger (1990) 52 Cal.3d 65, 73.)

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opn. No.

    New York Attorney General Reports · Apr 30, 2003

    Coconato v. … See also Long Island Liquid Waste Ass'n v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opn. No.

    New York Attorney General Reports · Apr 3, 1991

    Requestor: Richard V. Breslin, Esq., County Attorney County of Chenango County Office Building Norwich, New York 13815 Written by: James D. … board.]

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.