Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
0.65s
Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion
Texas Attorney General Reports · Jul 2, 1957
-v. IJJ S.W.2d 347 (Tex.Civ.App. 1937, . . … giedman w 131 Tex v. AmericanS&etp Co.'
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Feb 25, 1996
Quinney v. Pittman, 320 Ark. 177 , 895 S.W.2d 538 (1995). … Donoho v. Donoho, 318 Ark. 637 , 887 S.W.2d 290 (1994).
Cited 0 timesPublishedUntitled Texas Attorney General Opinion
Texas Attorney General Reports · Jul 2, 1975
Arnette: On behalf of the Texas State Board of Pharmacy you have asked whether the Board under article 4542a, V. T. C. S. … Section 4 of article 4542a, V. T. C.
Cited 0 timesPublished76 Op. Att'y Gen. 173 · Wisconsin Attorney General Reports · Jul 13, 1987
State v. Smith , 50 Wis.2d 460 , 471-72 , 184 N.W.2d 889 (1971); Elkhorn School Dist. v. East Troy School Dist ., 110 Wis.2d 1 , 4 , 327 N.W.2d 206 (Ct.App. 1982). … Kleczka v. Conta , 82 Wis.2d 679 , 708-09 , 264 N.W.2d 539 (1978).
Cited 1 timesPublishedNew York Attorney General Reports · Apr 13, 1976
And to the same effect are the following authorities: Minot v. Inhabitants of West Roxbury (supra); Anthony v. Adams ( 1 Met. 284 ); Parsons v. Inhabitants of Goshen ( 11 Pick. 396 ); Lemnon v. … City of Newton ( 134 Mass. 476 ); Cornell v. Town of Guilford ( 1 Denio, 510 ); Board of Supervisors v. Ellis, ( 59 N.Y. 620 )."
Cited 0 timesPublishedLouisiana Attorney General Reports · Nov 1, 2005
, and city school boards within their respective districts and of every state board or commission domiciled therein, including levee boards, hospital and asylum boards, education boards, and all state boards and commissions … We also call your attention to the decision rendered in Department of State Civil Service v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedUntitled California Attorney General Opinion
California Attorney General Reports · Aug 23, 1995
(Brown v. Kelly Broadcasting Co., supra, 48 3. 95-513 Cal.3d 711, 724, quoting Moyer v. … Superior Court (1979) 25 Cal.3d 474, 495; Amador Valley Joint Union School District v. State Board of Equalization (1978) 22 Cal.3d 208, 245-246.)
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Dec 5, 2001
Pennington v. Oliver, 245 Ark. 251 , 254 , 431 S.W.2d 843 (1968), quoting Faucette, Mayor v. Gerlach, 132 Ark. 58 , 200 S.W. 279 (1918). The acts of de facto officers are valid. See Appleby v. Belden Corp., 22 Ark. … See e.g., Sitton v. Burnett, 216 Ark. 574 , 226 S.W.2d 544 (1950). In my opinion, therefore, the school board director you describe, during the period he lacks the requisite residence, is ineligible to hold the office.
Cited 0 timesPublished91 Op. Att'y Gen. 145 · Maryland Attorney General Reports · Jul 10, 2006
The Court of Appeals has held that a county board of education "is not part of the executive branch of the county government nor an agency under its control." Board of Education v. … See also Chesapeake Charter, Inc. v. Anne Arundel County Bd. Of Educ., 358 Md. 129 , 136-37 , 747 A.2d 625 (2000) (summarizing the status of a local board); Board of Education of Prince George's County v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedCalifornia Attorney General Reports · Feb 25, 2000
Chapman v. Rapsey (1940) 16 Cal.2d 636 , 641-642 ; 66 Ops.Cal.Atty.Gen. 176 , 177 (1983).) … (Dibb v. County of San Diego (1996) 8 Cal.4th 1200 , 1212 ; 78 Ops.Cal.Atty.Gen. 362 , 364-365 (1995).) A person serving in an advisory capacity does not exercise any sovereign powers. (See Parker v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Dec 22, 2006
See Davis v. Holt , 304 Ark. 619 , 804 S.W.2d 362 (1991) (applying Ark. … See Davis, supra ; Thomas v. Sitton, 213 Ark. 816 , 212 S.W.2d 710 (1948).
Cited 0 timesPublishedCalifornia Attorney General Reports · Jan 16, 1998
Statutes are to be blended into each other, even when they are in different codes. ( Meninga v. Raley's, Inc . (1989) 216 Cal.App.3d 79 , 90 ; Austin v. Board of Retirement (1989) 209 Cal.App.3d 1528 , 1532 .) … This construction is consistent with the Board's administrative interpretation. (See Dix v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedUntitled Texas Attorney General Opinion
Texas Attorney General Reports · Jul 2, 1974
Buckeye Power, Inc. v. Environment81 Protection Agency, 481 F. Zd 162 (6th Cir. 1973); Americ8n Express Co. v. U.S., 472 F. Zd 1050 (C.C. P.A. Austin, PItent App. 1973); Willrpoint Cysterr, Inc. v. … See City of Houston v. Blackbird, 394 S. W. Zd 159, 163 (Tex. Sup. 1965); Victory v. St8te, 158 S. W. Zd 760. 766 (Tex. Sup. 1942).
Cited 0 timesPublishedNebraska Attorney General Reports · Aug 18, 1998
Jolly v. State, 252 Neb. 289 , 562 N.W.2d 61 (1997). See also PLPSO v. Papillion/La Vista School Dist., 252 Neb. 308 , 562 N.W.2d 335 (1997); Southeast Rur. Vol. Fire Dept. v. Neb. … Dept. of Rev., 251 Neb. 852 , 560 N.W.2d 436 (1997); Grand Island Latin Club v. Nebraska Liquor Control Com'n, 251 Neb. 61 , 554 N.W.2d 778 (1996); CenTra, Inc. v. Chandler Ins.
Cited 0 timesPublishedKansas Attorney General Reports · Nov 20, 2003
Miller v. Board of Education (Peabody) , 212 Kan. 482 , Syl. ¶ 6 (1973). 3 U.S.D. No. 380 v. McMillen , 212 Kan. 482 (1993); Peabody , supra . 4 Bd. of Ed. of U.S.D. No. 443, Ford County v. … Berg , 270 Kan. 237 , 238 (2000). 15 State v. Dewey , 22 Kan. App. 2d 963 , 966 (1996). See also Huelsman v. Kansas Department of Revenue , 267 Kan. 456 (1999). 16 K.A.R. 91-22-1a . 17 Bates v.
Cited 0 timesPublished90 Op. Att'y Gen. 17 · Maryland Attorney General Reports · Jan 5, 2005
Walker v. State, 125 Md. … Fitzgerald v. Hampton, 467 F.2d 755 (D.C. Cir. 1972). *Page 24
Cited 0 timesPublishedArkansas Attorney General Reports · Dec 19, 2001
See e.g., Stephens v. Arkansas School for the Blind, 341 Ark. 939 , 20 S.W.3d 397 (2000); Central Southern Companies, Inc. v. Weiss, 339 Ark. 76 , 3 S.W.3d 294 (1999); and Ford v. … See e.g., McDonald v. Pettus, 337 Ark. 265 , 988 S.W.2d 9 (1999); and Brimer v. Arkansas Contractors Licensing Bd., 312 Ark. 401 , 405 , 849 S.W.2d 948 (1993).
Cited 0 timesPublishedUntitled California Attorney General Opinion
California Attorney General Reports · Oct 15, 1997
(Brown v. Kelly Broadcasting Co. (1989) 48 Cal.3d 721, 724.) "In so doing we turn first to the statutory language, since the words the Legislature chose are the best indicators of its intent. … (Rojo v. Kliger (1990) 52 Cal.3d 65, 73.)
Cited 0 timesPublishedNew York Attorney General Reports · Apr 30, 2003
Coconato v. … See also Long Island Liquid Waste Ass'n v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedNew York Attorney General Reports · Apr 3, 1991
Requestor: Richard V. Breslin, Esq., County Attorney County of Chenango County Office Building Norwich, New York 13815 Written by: James D. … board.]
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna