Opinion

Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

Court
Texas Attorney General Reports
Filed
Jul 2, 1974
Status
Published
On the bench
John Hill
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

.

THE ATTORXEY GEXERAL

OF TEXAS

December 9, 1974

The Honorable Ihvid Finncy, Ch8irm8a

State Affrirr Committee Opinion No. H- 467

House of Reprerent8tives

P. 0. Box 2910, Capitol Strtion Re: Whether the Libr8ry

Aumtin, Texan 78767 Bo8rd of the City of

Irving ir covered by

the Open Meetingr kw,

art. 6252-17. V. T.C.S.,

8s amended by the 63rd

Dear Repreaentrtive Finney: Legial8ture.

You have 8sked our opinion aa to the 8pplicability of the Texas Open

Meetings LOW, Article 6252-17, V. T. C.S; , to the Library Barrd of the

City of Irving.

The purpore of the Open Meetiagr L8w i8 to open to the public the

deliberation of public businerr by those government81 bodice covered

by the Act. Government81 body is defined in section l(c) of the Act. as:

. . . any board. c ommirrion. dcprrtment, committee,

or 8gency within the executive or 1egirMiw department

of the date, which ir under the direction of one or more

elected or appointed members; and every Commirrionerr

Court 8nd city council in the lt8te, 8nd every deliber8tive

body h8ving n&e-making or qurri-judicial power 8nd

ckmrified 88 8 department, 8gency. or political rubdivirion

of 8 county or city; rnd the board of trusteea of every

school district, and every rpecirl district heretofore or

here8fter crerted by law. (Emphasis added)

The definition of government81 body for 8gencien or departments of 8

city or 8 county ie different th8n thrt for 8n rgency of the St&e. See

Attorney General Opinion H-438 (1974). To come within the purl of

the Act, the Library Board would have to be 8 “deltber8tive body h8ving

rule-making or qurri-judicial power rnd cl8rrified 86 8 dep8rtment. 8gency,

or political subdivirion of 8 county or city.” V. T. C.S. 8rt. 6252-17, $1(c).

p. 2136

.. ;: ’

The Honor8ble B8vid Finney, page 2 (H-467)

It is conceded thrt the Librrry Board is a department or agency of

the City. Therefore, the focur muat be on whether the Librrry Borrd

h8r rule-making or 9U88i-jUdiCi81 power. Rule-mrking 8uthority ir

legisktive in lvture 8nd involves brord policy conrider8tions. Buckeye

Power, Inc. v. Environment81 Protection Agency, 481 F. Zd 162 (6th

Cir. 1973); Americ8n Express Co. v. U.S., 472 F. Zd 1050 (C.C. P.A.

Austin, PItent App. 1973); Willrpoint Cysterr, Inc. v. Ewing, 174 F. Zd

676 (9th Cir. 1949) cert. denied, 339 U.S. 860. An administrative

agency determining the rights of one or more parties under 8 generrl

rule. regulation, ordinance, or rtatute is exercising 8 qU8Si-jUdiCi81

power. See City of Houston v. Blackbird, 394 S. W. Zd 159, 163 (Tex.

Sup. 1965); Victory v. St8te, 158 S. W. Zd 760. 766 (Tex. Sup. 1942).

We are informed thnt the powers 8nd duties of the Library Board are

set forth in section 20-S of the Code of Civil 8nd Criminal Ordinances

of the City of Irving. Section 20-S decl8rea:

The library Board skull be 8n advisory board and

shirll b8ve the following duties:

(8) To m8ke recommend8tions concerning the adoption

8nd enforcement of 811 necessary rules, bylaws

rnd regulation8 deemed by it nece.as8ry for the

rdministrotion. government 8nd protection of

the libr8ry ayatcm.

(b) To define the powers and prercribe the duties

rnd tenure of offacera of the library board,

8nd t0 elect 8B Officers.

(c) To review with the libr8ri8n 8nd make recommen-

dotionr for the purchrse of books, journals,

pubLic8tions. furniture rnd fixtures and other

necesrrry property, rnd to provide for the re-

binding and preserntion in proper order, the

books, documentm, journals and other public8tions.

rnd the property of the libr8ry.

p. 2137

?’ , r

.

:

:, The Honorrble David Finney, p8ge 3 (H-467)

(d)To make recommen&tionr for the lrt8blirhment

of luch brrncher of the libr8ry 8nd rerding rooms

8s the growth of the city mry from time to time

demand.

(C) To interview with the city m8n8ger, md make

recommendationa for the employment rnd dutier

of the libnrirn.

(0 The librrry bo8rd may recommend the removal

8nd dirmiraal of the iibr8ri8n.

(g)Ia the event the city council maker 8viilPble

money for the enlargement, exp*nrion or re-

building of the municiprl libr8ry, the librrry

board rholl have the right to recommend 8 site

for ruch improvementa; may recommend 8n

8rchitect, or such rrchitects 8s they deem

necerrrry for the prepor8tion of pl8n8 8nd

sptcifacrtionr for the construction rnd erec-

tion of the improvementa; provided, that if

my contract for the improvements of the library

system is m8de. nuch contr8ct ah811 be in tbe

name of the city, upon plans rnd specifications

rpproved by the city council.

(h) The libr8ry board with the librarian shall

rnnually rt the time provided by the charter,

file its propored lxpenditurer within the 8nnu81

fund8 8vrilable for the next fiscrl yeor with the

city mraager, 8nd if rpproved by the city council,

the s8me shall become 8 p8rt of the operrting

budget of the city, the 6arne 8# the other dep8rt-

mentr of the city. (Ordinance No. 714, Section 6)

from the 8bove recitation th8t the Libr8ry Board does

It is rpparent

not 8ct in 8 quori-judicinl crpacity. It is 8100 8pp8rent th8t the respon-

libilities of the Libnry Board h8ve been dr8wn 80 86 to be 8dvirory.

lnmof8r 88 the Board truly 8Cta in rn 8dvirory C8p8Cit-y Otiy, it i6 our

opinion that it doer not have rule-mnking power 8nd ia not within the

p. 2138

. ..T ’

The Honorable D8vid Ftnney, p8ge 4 (H-467)

purview of the Open Meetings L8w. But were the Board to be

functioning, in rerlity, 88 more th8n 8n rdvirory body [empeci8Uy

with reg8rd LOsection go-S(r) Of the Code of the City of Irving].

we would be of the opinion thrt the Board should h8ve to comply

with the mand8tem of the Open Meetings Act regrrding public notice

8nd open meetings.

SUMMARY

A city’slibr8ry board which acts solely in 8n

advisory c8pacity md h8r no rule-making or qu8mi-

judici81 power ir not required to comply with the

manhates of the Open Meetings Act regrrding public

notice 8 ad open meetings.

Very truly yours,

A

// Attorney General of Tuna

APPROVED:

DAVID M. KENDALL, First Assistant

C. ROBERT HEATH, Chairman

Opinion Committee

p. 2139

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.