Case law

No.

Colorado Attorney General Reports · Oct 13, 1975

Sam Brown State Treasurer State Capitol Building Denver, Colorado 80203 Dear Mr. … V , § 33 TREASURY, DEPT.

Maryland Attorney General Opinion 108OAG21

Maryland Attorney General Reports · May 15, 2023

An eleven-member body called the Maryland 529 Board (the “Board”) currently oversees all three programs. Educ. § 18-1904.5 Board members are fiduciaries subject to bond requirements. Id. §§ 18-1907(a), 18-1908. … It is “inconsistent with common sense,” State v.

Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

Texas Attorney General Reports · Jul 2, 1949

Oplnlens: V-6$, O-1422, O-989. … Opinions V-759, V-689, V-3\ 5, o-5087, O-4982; O-7491. Accordingly, we answer both your submitted questions in the negative.

Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

Texas Attorney General Reports · Jul 2, 1947

Brown, page 2 - v-81 this provision. The trouble seems to be that the Securities and Exchange Commis- sion does not approve an issue but simply registers the same. … Brown, page 4 - v-81 a 'list approved" b the Conmtissionwithin the mean- ing of subdivision 9b) of Sec. 23 of the Texas Securi- tie8 Act.

Opinion No. (2007)

Missouri Attorney General Reports · Oct 4, 2007

*Page 5 State v. Goebel , 83 S.W.3d 639 , 645 (Mo.App.E.D. 2002). See also Crum v. Mo. Dir. of Revenue , 455 F.Supp.2d 978 (W.D. … The Supreme Court has issued an opinion relating to SB 40 boards and the power to tax. In State ex rel. Indus. Serv. Contractors, Inc. v.

Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

Texas Attorney General Reports · Jul 2, 1950

McCoy, D.C., President Board of ChiropracticExamtnere Austin, Texas Opinion NO. v-1081 Rer The authority of the Texas Board of ChiropracticEx- … ClcCoy,D.C., page 2 (v-1081) You desire to know whether a chiropractorof a.

Opinion Number

Louisiana Attorney General Reports · Mar 1, 2010

to discuss "strategy sessions or negotiations with respect to collective bargaining . . . when an open meeting would have a detrimental effect on the bargaining . . . position of the public body." 2 Title Research Corp. v. … Rausch , 450 So.2d 933 (La. 1984); Landis v. Moreau , 00-1157 (La. 2/21/01), 779 So.2d 691 . 3 La.R.S. 44:31 . 4 La.R.S.44:1(A)(2)(a).

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Nov 23, 2009

Byrd v. State , 240 Ark. 743 , 402 S.W.2d 121 (1966). The most common constitutional prohibitions include Ark. … Thompson v. Roberts , 333 Ark. 544 , 549 , 970 S.W.2d 239 (1998). See also Byrd v. State , supra .

Opinion No. Oag 38-80, (1980)

69 Op. Att'y Gen. 139 · Wisconsin Attorney General Reports · Jun 17, 1980

See Sigma Tau Gamma Fraternity House v. Menomonie , 93 Wis.2d 392 , 413 , 288 N.W.2d 85 (1980). The situation you raise is far closer to the issues the court treated in Manitowoc v. … Appleton v. ILHR Department , 67 Wis.2d 162 , 172-73 , 226 N.W.2d 497 (1975).

Opinion No. (2000)

California Attorney General Reports · May 2, 2000

Board of Supervisors (1975) 53 Cal.App.3d 1004 , 1012 ["It may be presumed that the Board will comply with the law"]; San Bernardino County Flood Etc. Dist. v. … Board of Supervisors v.

Opn. No.

New York Attorney General Reports · Feb 4, 2011

You have explained that the board currently has some vacancies and you anticipate more in the near future, and thus you ask how many board members are necessary to approve matters that are voted on. … See Roosevelt Islanders for Responsible Southtown Dev. v. Roosevelt Island Oper. Corp. , 291 A.D.2d 40 , 49-50 (1 st Dep't 2001); New York State Urban Devel. Corp. v.

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Sep 12, 2005

Venhaus v. State ex rel Lofton, 285 Ark. 23 , 684 S.W.2d 252 (1985), citing Walden v. Hart, 243 Ark. 650 , 420 S.W.2d 868 (1967). … Beek v. Wagener, 77 Minn. 483 , 80 N.W. 633 (1899). But see, People v. Beekman Company, 347 Ill. 92 , 179 N.E. 435 (1931).

Opinion No. Oag 111-77, (1977)

66 Op. Att'y Gen. 358 · Wisconsin Attorney General Reports · Dec 27, 1977

County boards have only those legislative powers conferred upon them by statute, expressly or by clear implication. Maier v. Racine County , 1 Wis.2d 384 , 84 N.W.2d 76 (1957). … Ehly , 62 Wis.2d 31 , 214 N.W.2d 432 (1974), and Lister v. Board of Regents , 72 Wis.2d 282 , 240 N.W.2d 610 (1976) and liability for ultra vires acts: Lister , *Page 361 supra, Humboldt v.

Opinion No. (2003)

California Attorney General Reports · Sep 3, 2003

If, as here, the public officer is a board member, this prohibition extends to the board on which he serves. (See Thomson v. Call (1985) 38 Cal.3d 633 .) … McKinley , supra , 80 Cal.App.3d 204 [contract with architectural firm of which board member was president and stockholder]; People v.

Opn. No.

New York Attorney General Reports · May 19, 1998

The number of members of a community services board is not a matter of State concern. Cf. Matter of Perales v. Heimbach , 166A.D.2d 707 (2d Dept 1990), app denied, 77 N.Y.2d 806 (1991). … See, Resnick v. County of Ulster , 44 N.Y.2d 279 (1978). The Attorney General renders formal opinions only to officers and departments of State government.

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports · Jul 27, 2011

The Board has in fact adopted rules interpreting Act 1061's "hired" provision. … Mountain Pure, LLC v. Little Rock Wastewater Utility , 2011 Ark. 258 , at 8 , ___ S.W.3d ___, 2011 WL 2410598 .

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports · May 23, 2007

Nos. 96-035 ; 92-098 (both citing Craighead County Board of Education v. Henry, 295 Ark. 242 , 748 S.W.2d 132 (1988)). … . § 6-13-620 (Supp. 2005) (defining the powers of school board directors); Safferstone v. Tucker I, 235 Ark. 70 , 357 S.W.2d 3 (1962) (generally discussing the breadth of discretion exercised by school board directors).

Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

Texas Attorney General Reports · Jul 2, 1974

S,ection 3 (a)(3) of Article 6252-17c, V. T. C. S., does not apply. … are declared “public” under Article 4477-5, V.

Opinion No. (1978)

Nebraska Attorney General Reports · Jan 18, 1978

See, cases against the State Board of Equalization and Assessment in 185 Neb. pp. 741 to 775. In Carpenter v. … As the Supreme Court said in Carpenter v.

Opinion No. (1997)

California Attorney General Reports · Jan 7, 1997

[Citation.]" ( Burden v. Snowden (1992) 2 Cal.4th 556 , 562 .) … (See Traub v. Board of Retirement , supra , 34 Cal.3d at p. 798 ; Summerford v. Board of Retirement (1977) 72 Cal.App.3d 128 , 132 .)